PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of daily i.v. administration of wild-type oncolytic reovirus (type 3 Dearing) to patients with advanced cancer, assess viral excretion kinetics and antiviral immune responses, identify tumor localization and replication, and describe antitumor activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received escalating doses of reovirus up to 3 x 10(10) TCID(50) for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Viral excretion was assessed by reverse transcription-PCR and antibody response by cytotoxicity neutralization assay. Pretreatment and post-treatment tumor biopsies were obtained to measure viral uptake and replication. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received 76 courses of reovirus from 1 x 10(8) for 1 day up to 3 x 10(10) TCID(50) for 5 days, repeated every four weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen. Common grade 1 to 2 toxicities included fever, fatigue, and headache, which were dose and cycle independent. Viral excretion at day 15 was not detected by reverse transcription-PCR at 25 cycles and only in 5 patients at 35 cycles. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in all patients and peaked at 4 weeks. Viral localization and replication in tumor biopsies were confirmed in 3 patients. Antitumor activity was seen by radiologic and tumor marker (carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19.9, and prostate-specific antigen) evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Oncolytic reovirus can be safely and repeatedly administered by i.v. injection at doses up to 3 x 10(10) TCID(50) for 5 days every 4 weeks without evidence of severe toxicities. Productive reoviral infection of metastatic tumor deposits was confirmed. Reovirus is a safe agent that warrants further evaluation in phase II studies.
PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of daily i.v. administration of wild-type oncolytic reovirus (type 3 Dearing) to patients with advanced cancer, assess viral excretion kinetics and antiviral immune responses, identify tumor localization and replication, and describe antitumor activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients received escalating doses of reovirus up to 3 x 10(10) TCID(50) for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Viral excretion was assessed by reverse transcription-PCR and antibody response by cytotoxicity neutralization assay. Pretreatment and post-treatment tumor biopsies were obtained to measure viral uptake and replication. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received 76 courses of reovirus from 1 x 10(8) for 1 day up to 3 x 10(10) TCID(50) for 5 days, repeated every four weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen. Common grade 1 to 2 toxicities included fever, fatigue, and headache, which were dose and cycle independent. Viral excretion at day 15 was not detected by reverse transcription-PCR at 25 cycles and only in 5 patients at 35 cycles. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in all patients and peaked at 4 weeks. Viral localization and replication in tumor biopsies were confirmed in 3 patients. Antitumor activity was seen by radiologic and tumor marker (carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19.9, and prostate-specific antigen) evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Oncolytic reovirus can be safely and repeatedly administered by i.v. injection at doses up to 3 x 10(10) TCID(50) for 5 days every 4 weeks without evidence of severe toxicities. Productive reoviral infection of metastatic tumor deposits was confirmed. Reovirus is a safe agent that warrants further evaluation in phase II studies.
Authors: Charles Comins; James Spicer; Andrew Protheroe; Victoria Roulstone; Katie Twigger; Christine M White; Richard Vile; Alan Melcher; Matt C Coffey; Karl L Mettinger; Gerard Nuovo; David E Cohn; Mitch Phelps; Kevin J Harrington; Hardev S Pandha Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Karishma Rajani; Christopher Parrish; Timothy Kottke; Jill Thompson; Shane Zaidi; Liz Ilett; Kevin G Shim; Rosa-Maria Diaz; Hardev Pandha; Kevin Harrington; Matt Coffey; Alan Melcher; Richard Vile Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: E Anders Kolb; Valerie Sampson; Deborah Stabley; Alexa Walter; Katia Sol-Church; Timothy Cripe; Pooja Hingorani; Charlotte Hsieh Ahern; Brenda J Weigel; James Zwiebel; Susan M Blaney Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Eleni M Karapanagiotou; Victoria Roulstone; Katie Twigger; Mercel Ball; Maryanne Tanay; Chris Nutting; Kate Newbold; Martin E Gore; James Larkin; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Matt Coffey; Brad Thompson; Karl Mettinger; Richard G Vile; Hardev S Pandha; Geoff D Hall; Alan A Melcher; John Chester; Kevin J Harrington Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M Kim; C T Williamson; J Prudhomme; D G Bebb; K Riabowol; P W K Lee; S P Lees-Miller; Y Mori; M M Rahman; G McFadden; R N Johnston Journal: Oncogene Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Timothy Kottke; Jill Thompson; Rosa Maria Diaz; Jose Pulido; Candice Willmon; Matt Coffey; Peter Selby; Alan Melcher; Kevin Harrington; Richard G Vile Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Claire-Audrey Y Bayan; Adriana T Lopez; Robyn D Gartrell; Kimberly M Komatsubara; Margaret Bogardus; Nisha Rao; Cynthia Chen; Thomas D Hart; Thomas Enzler; Emanuelle M Rizk; Jaya Sarin Pradhan; Douglas K Marks; Larisa J Geskin; Yvonne M Saenger Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2018-08-25 Impact factor: 5.075