PURPOSE: Although patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade 3 malignant glioma have a more favorable prognosis than those with WHO grade 4 malignant glioma, salvage therapies following recurrence offer essentially palliative benefit. We did a phase II trial of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, in combination with irinotecan for patients with recurrent grade 3 malignant glioma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Upon documentation of adequate safety among an initial cohort of nine patients treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and irinotecan every 14 days, a second cohort (n=24) was treated with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks with irinotecan on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of each 42-day cycle. For both cohorts, the dose of irinotecan was 340 mg/m(2) for patients on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAED) and 125 mg/m(2) for patients not on EIAEDs. After each 6-week cycle, patients were evaluated with a physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The 6-month progression-free survival was 55% (95% confidence interval, 36-70%). The 6-month overall survival was 79% (95% confidence interval, 61-89%). Twenty patients (61%) had at least a partial response. Outcome did not differ between the two treatment cohorts. Significant adverse events were infrequent and included a central nervous system hemorrhage in one patient, and one patient who developed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab and irinotecan is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity for patients with recurrent WHO grade 3 malignant glioma.
PURPOSE: Although patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade 3 malignant glioma have a more favorable prognosis than those with WHO grade 4 malignant glioma, salvage therapies following recurrence offer essentially palliative benefit. We did a phase II trial of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, in combination with irinotecan for patients with recurrent grade 3 malignant glioma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Upon documentation of adequate safety among an initial cohort of nine patients treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and irinotecan every 14 days, a second cohort (n=24) was treated with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks with irinotecan on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of each 42-day cycle. For both cohorts, the dose of irinotecan was 340 mg/m(2) for patients on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAED) and 125 mg/m(2) for patients not on EIAEDs. After each 6-week cycle, patients were evaluated with a physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The 6-month progression-free survival was 55% (95% confidence interval, 36-70%). The 6-month overall survival was 79% (95% confidence interval, 61-89%). Twenty patients (61%) had at least a partial response. Outcome did not differ between the two treatment cohorts. Significant adverse events were infrequent and included a central nervous system hemorrhage in one patient, and one patient who developed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. CONCLUSION:Bevacizumab and irinotecan is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity for patients with recurrent WHO grade 3 malignant glioma.
Authors: Carlos Frangié; Carmen Lefaucheur; Jacques Medioni; Christian Jacquot; Garry S Hill; Dominique Nochy Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Shideng Bao; Qiulian Wu; Sith Sathornsumetee; Yueling Hao; Zhizhong Li; Anita B Hjelmeland; Qing Shi; Roger E McLendon; Darell D Bigner; Jeremy N Rich Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Annick Desjardins; James Vredenburgh; Sridharan Gururangan; Sith Sathornsumetee; Michael Badruddoja; Roger McLendon; James Provenzale; James E Herndon; Jeannette M Dowell; Jill L Burkart; Herbert B Newton; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Frank Winkler; Sergey V Kozin; Ricky T Tong; Sung-Suk Chae; Michael F Booth; Igor Garkavtsev; Lei Xu; Daniel J Hicklin; Dai Fukumura; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Lance L Munn; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Alan Sandler; Robert Gray; Michael C Perry; Julie Brahmer; Joan H Schiller; Afshin Dowlati; Rogerio Lilenbaum; David H Johnson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Monika E Hegi; Annie-Claire Diserens; Thierry Gorlia; Marie-France Hamou; Nicolas de Tribolet; Michael Weller; Johan M Kros; Johannes A Hainfellner; Warren Mason; Luigi Mariani; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Peter Hau; René O Mirimanoff; J Gregory Cairncross; Robert C Janzer; Roger Stupp Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael D Prados; Kathleen Lamborn; W K A Yung; Kurt Jaeckle; H Ian Robins; Minesh Mehta; Howard A Fine; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy Cloughesy; Susan Chang; M Kelly Nicholas; David Schiff; Harry Greenberg; Larry Junck; Karen Fink; Ken Hess; John Kuhn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2006-03-13 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Gentao Liu; Xiangpeng Yuan; Zhaohui Zeng; Patrizia Tunici; Hiushan Ng; Iman R Abdulkadir; Lizhi Lu; Dwain Irvin; Keith L Black; John S Yu Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2006-12-02 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: Rhonda L Bitting; Patrick Healy; Patricia A Creel; James Turnbull; Karla Morris; Sarah Yenser Wood; Herbert I Hurwitz; Mark D Starr; Andrew B Nixon; Andrew J Armstrong; Daniel J George Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Maaike J Vos; Johannes Berkhof; Otto S Hoekstra; Ingeborg Bosma; Eefje M Sizoo; Jan J Heimans; Jaap C Reijneveld; Esther Sanchez; Frank J Lagerwaard; Jan Buter; David P Noske; Tjeerd J Postma Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: D A Reardon; A Desjardins; J J Vredenburgh; S Gururangan; J H Sampson; S Sathornsumetee; R E McLendon; J E Herndon; J E Marcello; J Norfleet; A H Friedman; D D Bigner; H S Friedman Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 7.640