PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, lead to significant tumor regressions in 10% to 15% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR activating mutations. However, 30% to 40% of NSCLC patients, majority of whom are EGFR wild-type, develop stable disease following EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. EGFR-directed antibodies (cetuximab) are effective treatments for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, which seldom contain EGFR mutations. The determinant(s) of efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapies in EGFR wild-type cancers is not well defined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined the relationship of EGFR ligands, EGF, transforming growth factor-alpha,and amphiregulin and the efficacy of gefitinib and cetuximab in EGFR wild-type NSCLC (n=10) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (n=4) cell lines. We compared amphiregulin expression using immunohistochemistry in EGFR wild-type NSCLC patients (n=24) that developed either stable or progressive disease following erlotinib or gefitinib treatment. RESULTS: Cell lines which produced >or=20 pmol/L amphiregulin, as detected by an ELISA, were significantly more likely to be growth inhibited by both gefitinib and cetuximab than those that produced minimal or no amphiregulin. In these cell lines, both cetuximab and gefitinib led to cell cycle arrest at the G(1)-S boundary and was associated with preferential inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 but not Akt signaling. Amphiregulin expression was significantly higher in NSCLC patients that developed stable disease compared with those that developed disease progression following gefitinib or erlotinib treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Amphiregulin expression may help select EGFR wild-type patients who are likely to develop stable disease from EGFR-targeted therapies.
PURPOSE:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, lead to significant tumor regressions in 10% to 15% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR activating mutations. However, 30% to 40% of NSCLCpatients, majority of whom are EGFR wild-type, develop stable disease following EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. EGFR-directed antibodies (cetuximab) are effective treatments for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, which seldom contain EGFR mutations. The determinant(s) of efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapies in EGFRwild-type cancers is not well defined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined the relationship of EGFR ligands, EGF, transforming growth factor-alpha,and amphiregulin and the efficacy of gefitinib and cetuximab in EGFR wild-type NSCLC (n=10) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (n=4) cell lines. We compared amphiregulin expression using immunohistochemistry in EGFR wild-type NSCLCpatients (n=24) that developed either stable or progressive disease following erlotinib or gefitinib treatment. RESULTS: Cell lines which produced >or=20 pmol/L amphiregulin, as detected by an ELISA, were significantly more likely to be growth inhibited by both gefitinib and cetuximab than those that produced minimal or no amphiregulin. In these cell lines, both cetuximab and gefitinib led to cell cycle arrest at the G(1)-S boundary and was associated with preferential inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 but not Akt signaling. Amphiregulin expression was significantly higher in NSCLCpatients that developed stable disease compared with those that developed disease progression following gefitinib or erlotinib treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Amphiregulin expression may help select EGFR wild-type patients who are likely to develop stable disease from EGFR-targeted therapies.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Takashi Karashima; Paul Sweeney; Joel W Slaton; Sun J Kim; Daniel Kedar; Jonathan I Izawa; Zhen Fan; Curtis Pettaway; Daniel J Hicklin; Taro Shuin; Colin P N Dinney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Sean Tracy; Toru Mukohara; Mark Hansen; Matthew Meyerson; Bruce E Johnson; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Joan Albanell; Federico Rojo; Steve Averbuch; Andrea Feyereislova; Jose Manuel Mascaro; Roy Herbst; Patricia LoRusso; Danny Rischin; Silvia Sauleda; Julia Gee; Robert I Nicholson; Jose Baselga Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Y Ohsaki; S Tanno; Y Fujita; E Toyoshima; S Fujiuchi; Y Nishigaki; S Ishida; A Nagase; N Miyokawa; S Hirata; K Kikuchi Journal: Oncol Rep Date: 2000 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: William Pao; Vincent Miller; Maureen Zakowski; Jennifer Doherty; Katerina Politi; Inderpal Sarkaria; Bhuvanesh Singh; Robert Heelan; Valerie Rusch; Lucinda Fulton; Elaine Mardis; Doris Kupfer; Richard Wilson; Mark Kris; Harold Varmus Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-08-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Paul A Bunn; Michael V Di Maria; Robert Veve; Roy M Bremmes; Anna E Barón; Chan Zeng; Wilbur A Franklin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Goro Oshima; Johan Wennerberg; Takashi Yamatodani; Elisabeth Kjellén; Hiroyuki Mineta; Anders Johnsson; Lars Ekblad Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Eliezer M Van Allen; Vivian W Y Lui; Ann Marie Egloff; Eva M Goetz; Hua Li; Jonas T Johnson; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Julie E Bauman; Nicolas Stransky; Yan Zeng; Breean R Gilbert; Kelsey P Pendleton; Lin Wang; Simion Chiosea; Carrie Sougnez; Nikhil Wagle; Fan Zhang; Yu Du; David Close; Paul A Johnston; Aaron McKenna; Scott L Carter; Todd R Golub; Gad Getz; Gordon B Mills; Levi A Garraway; Jennifer R Grandis Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Alec Vaezi; Xiaozhe Wang; Shama Buch; William Gooding; Lin Wang; Raja R Seethala; David T Weaver; Alan D D'Andrea; Athanassios Argiris; Marjorie Romkes; Laura J Niedernhofer; Jennifer R Grandis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kristy J Wilson; Christopher Mill; Sydney Lambert; Jennifer Buchman; Timothy R Wilson; Victor Hernandez-Gordillo; Richard M Gallo; Laura M C Ades; Jeffrey Settleman; David J Riese Journal: Growth Factors Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 2.511
Authors: Kazuhiko Shien; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Dennis Ruder; Carmen Behrens; Li Shen; Neda Kalhor; Juhee Song; J Jack Lee; Jing Wang; Ximing Tang; Roy S Herbst; Shinichi Toyooka; Luc Girard; John D Minna; Jonathan M Kurie; Ignacio I Wistuba; Julie G Izzo Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Elizabeth A Hopper-Borge; Rochelle E Nasto; Vladimir Ratushny; Louis M Weiner; Erica A Golemis; Igor Astsaturov Journal: Expert Opin Ther Targets Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.902
Authors: S Carvalho; M Lindzen; M Lauriola; N Shirazi; S Sinha; A Abdul-Hai; K Levanon; J Korach; I Barshack; Y Cohen; A Onn; G Mills; Y Yarden Journal: Oncogene Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Kazuya Machida; Steven Eschrich; Jiannong Li; Yun Bai; John Koomen; Bruce J Mayer; Eric B Haura Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Menghong Sun; Carmen Behrens; Lei Feng; Natalie Ozburn; Ximing Tang; Guosheng Yin; Ritsuko Komaki; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Waun Ki Hong; Kenneth D Aldape; Ignacio I Wistuba Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kirstine Roepstorff; Michael Vibo Grandal; Lasse Henriksen; Stine Louise Jeppe Knudsen; Mads Lerdrup; Lene Grøvdal; Berthe Marie Willumsen; Bo van Deurs Journal: Traffic Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 6.215