Literature DB >> 18980928

Overcoming barriers to cancer-helpline professionals providing decision support for callers: an implementation study.

Dawn Stacey1, Suzanne K Chambers, Mary Jane Jacobsen, Jeff Dunn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of an intervention on healthcare professionals' perceptions of barriers influencing their provision of decision support for callers facing cancer-related decisions.
DESIGN: A pre- and post-test study guided by the Ottawa Model of Research Use.
SETTING: Australian statewide cancer call center that provides public access to information and supportive cancer services. SAMPLE: 34 nurses, psychologists, and other allied healthcare professionals at the cancer call center.
METHODS: Participants completed baseline measures and, subsequently, were exposed to an intervention that included a decision support tutorial, coaching protocol, and skill-building workshop. Strategies were implemented to address organizational barriers. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Perceived barriers and facilitators influencing provision of decision support, decision support knowledge, quality of decision support provided to standardized callers, and call length.
FINDINGS: Postintervention participants felt more prepared, confident in providing decision support, and aware of decision support resources. They had a stronger belief that providing decision support was within their role. Participants significantly improved their knowledge and provided higher-quality decision support to standardized callers without changing call length.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation intervention overcame several identified barriers that influenced call center professionals when providing decision support. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses and other helpline professionals have the potential to provide decision support designed to help callers understand cancer information, clarify their values associated with their options, and reduce decisional conflict. However, they require targeted education and organizational interventions to reduce their perceived barriers to providing decision support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18980928     DOI: 10.1188/08.ONF.961-969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  16 in total

1.  Managing symptoms during cancer treatments: evaluating the implementation of evidence-informed remote support protocols.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Debra Bakker; Barbara Ballantyne; Kimberly Chapman; Joanne Cumminger; Esther Green; Margaret Harrison; Doris Howell; Craig Kuziemsky; Terry MacKenzie; Brenda Sabo; Myriam Skrutkowski; Ann Syme; Angela Whynot
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Implementation of a cystic fibrosis lung transplant referral patient decision aid in routine clinical practice: an observational study.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Katherine L Vandemheen; Rosamund Hennessey; Tracy Gooyers; Ena Gaudet; Ranjeeta Mallick; Josette Salgado; Andreas Freitag; Yves Berthiaume; Neil Brown; Shawn D Aaron
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  The evaluation of a rectal cancer decision aid and the factors influencing its implementation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Robert Wu; Robin Boushey; Beth Potter; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Patchy 'coherence': using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC).

Authors:  Amy Lloyd; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Adrian Edwards; Andrew Rix; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne Christin Rahn; Sascha Köpke; Jürgen Kasper; Eik Vettorazzi; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Christoph Heesen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Beating the blues after cancer: randomised controlled trial of a tele-based psychological intervention for high distress patients and carers.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Afaf Girgis; Stefano Occhipinti; Sandy Hutchison; Jane Turner; Rob Carter; Jeff Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Development and evaluation of evidence-informed clinical nursing protocols for remote assessment, triage and support of cancer treatment-induced symptoms.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Gail Macartney; Meg Carley; Margaret B Harrison
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2013-02-18

Review 8.  Implementation of improvement strategies in palliative care: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jasper van Riet Paap; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Ragni Sommerbakk; Wendy Moyle; Marianne J Hjermstad; Wojciech Leppert; Kris Vissers; Yvonne Engels
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Isabelle Scholl; Caroline Tietbohl; Mala Mann; Adrian G K Edwards; Catharine Clay; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Carmen L Lewis; Richard M Wexler; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Jeff Belkora; B Joyce Davison; Marie-Anne Durand; Karen B Eden; Aubri S Hoffman; Mirjam Koerner; France Légaré; Marie-Chantal Loiselle; Richard L Street
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.