Literature DB >> 18980913

2008 ONS research priorities survey.

Ardith Z Doorenbos1, Ann M Berger, Cheryl Brohard-Holbert, Linda Eaton, Sharon Kozachik, Geri LoBiondo-Wood, Gail Mallory, Tessa Rue, Claudette Varricchio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To determine the priorities of oncology nursing research, including the effect of evidence-based practice resources as identified by the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) membership in June 2008.
DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional.
SETTING: A Web-based survey of ONS members. SAMPLE: Stratified into three groups: a representative random sample of the general membership (n = 4,460, 421 responded), an over-sampled random sample of advanced practice nurses (n = 980, 149 responded), and all ONS members who were doctorally prepared (n = 589, 143 responded); 713 responded overall.
METHODS: The 2004 survey was revised and the new 2008 survey was beta tested. The invitation to complete the survey was sent via e-mail with a link to the survey Web site. A follow-up reminder was sent one week after the initial invitation. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: 70 oncology nursing research topic questions, divided into five categories, and two additional categories regarding ONS Putting Evidence Into Practice resources.
FINDINGS: Quality of life and pain were the two highest rated topics, consistent with 2000 and 2004 research priority survey findings. Eleven topics were new to the top 20 ranked priority topics in 2008. Differences in rankings were apparent between member groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The respondents represented the broad spectrum of ONS membership. Changes in topic rankings indicate that oncology nursing research priorities have shifted since the 2004 survey. The lag in research result dissemination to clinical practice may account for differences in topic rating between groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The survey results will be used to develop the 2009-2013 ONS Research Agenda. The results also will assist the ONS Foundation and other funding agencies in setting priorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18980913     DOI: 10.1188/08.onf.e100-e107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  7 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the cancer pain experience.

Authors:  Judith A Schreiber
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014

2.  Validating the clinical research nursing domain of practice.

Authors:  Kathleen Castro; Margaret Bevans; Claiborne Miller-Davis; Georgie Cusack; Frances Loscalzo; Ann Marie Matlock; Helen Mayberry; Linda Tondreau; Diane Walsh; Clare Hastings
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Patient-reported symptoms and quality of life integrated into clinical cancer care.

Authors:  Donna L Berry
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.315

4.  The 2009-2013 research agenda for oncology nursing.

Authors:  Ann M Berger; Barbara Cochrane; Sandra A Mitchell
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Analysis of the influence of parenteral cancer chemotherapy on the health condition of oral mucosa.

Authors:  Mansur Rahnama; Barbara Madej-Czerwonka; Izabela Jastrzębska-Jamrogiewicz; Rafał Jamrogiewicz
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015-03-26

6.  The effect of group psycho-education program on the burden of family caregivers with multiple sclerosis patients in Isfahan in 2013-2014.

Authors:  Saeid Pahlavanzadeh; Fariba Dalvi-Isfahani; Nasrollah Alimohammadi; Ahmad Chitsaz
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

7.  Role competency scale on shared decision-making nurses: Development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Pamela Katz; Jessica Bishop-Royse; Lisa Hartle; Katharine L Szubski; Toreend Enecio; Ima Garcia; Nadia Spawn; Katherine Jones Masterton
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.