PURPOSE: Antidepressants are used for many indications besides depression. This makes investigating depression treatment outcomes in prescription databases problematic when the indication is unknown. The aim of our study is to develop an algorithm to identify antidepressant drug users from prescription data that suffer from depression. METHODS: Data for deriving the algorithm were obtained from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice, carried out in 2001 by The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), and for validation the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database was used. Both sets included adults receiving their first antidepressant drug in 2001 (n = 1855 and 3321, respectively). The outcome was a registered diagnosis of depression. Covariates investigated for developing the algorithm were patient and prescribing characteristics, and co-medication. RESULTS: The predictive algorithm included age, SSRI prescribed on the index date, prescribed dose, general practitioner as prescriber and the number of antidepressant prescriptions prescribed plus medication for treating acid related disorders, laxatives, cardiac therapy or hypnotics/sedatives prescribed in the 6 months prior to index date. The probability that the algorithm correctly identified an antidepressant drug user as having a depression diagnosis was 79% with a sensitivity of 79.6% and a specificity of 66.9%. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we developed and validated an algorithm that can be used to compose cohorts of patients treated with antidepressants for depression from prescription databases.
PURPOSE: Antidepressants are used for many indications besides depression. This makes investigating depression treatment outcomes in prescription databases problematic when the indication is unknown. The aim of our study is to develop an algorithm to identify antidepressant drug users from prescription data that suffer from depression. METHODS: Data for deriving the algorithm were obtained from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice, carried out in 2001 by The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), and for validation the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database was used. Both sets included adults receiving their first antidepressant drug in 2001 (n = 1855 and 3321, respectively). The outcome was a registered diagnosis of depression. Covariates investigated for developing the algorithm were patient and prescribing characteristics, and co-medication. RESULTS: The predictive algorithm included age, SSRI prescribed on the index date, prescribed dose, general practitioner as prescriber and the number of antidepressant prescriptions prescribed plus medication for treating acid related disorders, laxatives, cardiac therapy or hypnotics/sedatives prescribed in the 6 months prior to index date. The probability that the algorithm correctly identified an antidepressant drug user as having a depression diagnosis was 79% with a sensitivity of 79.6% and a specificity of 66.9%. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we developed and validated an algorithm that can be used to compose cohorts of patients treated with antidepressants for depression from prescription databases.
Authors: Greta A Bushnell; Til Stürmer; Bradley N Gaynes; Virginia Pate; Matthew Miller Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Luca Degli Esposti; Carlo Piccinni; Diego Sangiorgi; Andrea Fagiolini; Stefano Buda Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: V Abbing-Karahagopian; C Huerta; P C Souverein; F de Abajo; H G M Leufkens; J Slattery; Y Alvarez; M Miret; M Gil; B Oliva; U Hesse; G Requena; F de Vries; M Rottenkolber; S Schmiedl; R Reynolds; R G Schlienger; M C H de Groot; O H Klungel; T P van Staa; L van Dijk; A C G Egberts; H Gardarsdottir; M L De Bruin Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-05-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Merete Osler; Eva Prescott; Ida Kim Wium-Andersen; Else Helene Ibfelt; Martin Balslev Jørgensen; Per Kragh Andersen; Terese Sara Høj Jørgensen; Marie Kim Wium-Andersen; Solvej Mårtensson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240