Literature DB >> 18979386

How moving objects become animated: the human mirror neuron system assimilates non-biological movement patterns.

Annerose Engel1, Michael Burke, Katja Fiehler, Siegfried Bien, Frank Rosler.   

Abstract

The so-called mirror neuron system (MNS) responds when humans observe actions performed by a member of their own species. This activity is understood as an internal motor representation of the observed movement pattern. By contrasting meaningless human hand movements with meaningless artificial movements of objects in space, we tested the claim that exclusively movements belonging to the human motor repertoire have direct access to the MNS. Eighteen participants observed video clips of moving hands and objects while the hemodynamic response was recorded with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Second-level analysis of the hemodynamic response revealed substantially overlapping activation patterns for both types of movements including relevant structures of the MNS (bilateral premotor and parietal areas, occipito-temporal junction, postcentral gyrus and the right superior temporal sulcus). This suggests that perceptual processing of moving hands and objects recruits similar and overlapping cortical networks. Direct comparison of the two movement types revealed stronger activations for hand movements mainly in structures of the MNS suggesting an "expertise effect". Overall, our results provide evidence that observing movements not explicitly belonging to the human motor repertoire can activate the human MNS, most likely because an association with a biological movement is evoked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18979386     DOI: 10.1080/17470910701612793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  20 in total

Review 1.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

Review 2.  Motion as manipulation: implementation of force-motion analogies by event-file binding and action planning.

Authors:  Chris Fields
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-02-14

3.  Implementation of structure-mapping inference by event-file binding and action planning: a model of tool-improvisation analogies.

Authors:  Chris Fields
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-06-05

4.  Perceiving nonverbal behavior: neural correlates of processing movement fluency and contingency in dyadic interactions.

Authors:  Alexandra L Georgescu; Bojana Kuzmanovic; Natacha S Santos; Ralf Tepest; Gary Bente; Marc Tittgemeyer; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Antje Holländer; Christina Jung; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Metaphorical motion in mathematical reasoning: further evidence for pre-motor implementation of structure mapping in abstract domains.

Authors:  Chris Fields
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-03-05

7.  Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Roman Liepelt; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Jim Parkinson; Richard Ramsey; Waltraud Stadler; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  How instructions modify perception: an fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency.

Authors:  James Stanley; Emma Gowen; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Brain network involved in visual processing of movement stimuli used in upper limb robotic training: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Federico Nocchi; Simone Gazzellini; Carmela Grisolia; Maurizio Petrarca; Vittorio Cannatà; Paolo Cappa; Tommaso D'Alessio; Enrico Castelli
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.