Literature DB >> 18979085

Protocols in expedited review: tackling the workload of ethics committees.

Michael Wolzt1, Christiane Druml, Daniela Leitner, Ernst A Singer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper describes the experience of the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, while managing the workload of clinical study applications.
METHODS: An expedited review process was introduced for initial review of study protocols regarded as minimal risk interventions in March 2004.
RESULTS: A total of 504 study protocols were submitted for review in 2003 and this number has increased to 743 in 2007. Two hundred sixty eight studies were classified as minimal risk in 2007 and allocated to a subgroup of the Committee for review. The time to full approval was shorter for these studies as compared to other protocols.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of initial expedited review can improve the performance of an Ethics Committee. A framework to achieve a single opinion for multisite research of minimal risk interventions should be considered to facilitate these low risk studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18979085     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1343-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  5 in total

1.  Variation in Institutional Review processes for a multisite observational study.

Authors:  Catherine C Vick; Kelly R Finan; Catarina Kiefe; Leigh Neumayer; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Etika Bioet       Date:  2002 Spring-Summer

3.  Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research.

Authors:  Lee A Green; Julie C Lowery; Christine P Kowalski; Leon Wyszewianski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.

Authors:  Liselotte N Dyrbye; Matthew R Thomas; Alex J Mechaber; Anne Eacker; William Harper; F Stanford Massie; David V Power; Tait D Shanafelt
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  A survey of IRB process in 68 U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Elaine Larson; Tiffany Bratts; Jack Zwanziger; Patricia Stone
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.176

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Should European Independent Ethics Committees be dismantled?

Authors:  Olivier Chassany
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2009. Part III: mechanical ventilation, acute lung injury and respiratory distress syndrome, pediatrics, ethics, and miscellanea.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Research ethics committees in Europe: trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Christiane Druml; M Wolzt; J Pleiner; E A Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 17.440

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.