Literature DB >> 18978555

The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the inclusion of broncho-pulmonary carcinoid tumors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.

William D Travis1, Dorothy J Giroux, Kari Chansky, John Crowley, Hisao Asamura, Elisabeth Brambilla, James Jett, Catherine Kennedy, Ramon Rami-Porta, Valerie W Rusch, Peter Goldstraw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the 2003 Supplement for tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) Staging classification it states that TNM staging "applies to all types of carcinoma including small cell carcinoma; however, it does not apply to carcinoids." Despite this caveat, most publications on typical and atypical carcinoids use the TNM staging system for nonsmall cell carcinoma and are able to demonstrate prognostic significance for the different stages. For this reason, as the next TNM Staging proposal is being considered, we sought to investigate the carcinoid cases submitted to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) database, as well as the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the data collected for the IASLC Staging Project database over the time period 1990 to 2000, there were 513 broncho-pulmonary carcinoids. A total of 1619 broncho-pulmonary carcinoid cases diagnosed over the period 1990-2002 were analyzed from the SEER database, including 1437 surgical cases. Pathologic slides were not available for histologic review.
RESULTS: Most of tumors in both the IASLC and SEER databases were Stage I (82% and 78%, respectively), as defined by the IASLC proposals for the 7th edition of TNM staging system. T status was a statistically significant predictor of survival for both the SEER data (p < 0.0001) and the IASLC database (p = 0.0156), though for different reasons. N status showed significant survival correlations in both data sets (p < 0.0001). The effect of M status was significant (p < 0.0001) within the SEER data and not studied in the IASLC cases, which were almost exclusively M0. We found that all three T, N, and M categories as defined for non-small cell lung cancer are generally useful for staging of pulmonary carcinoid tumors. Significant differences in survival for overall stages I versus II versus III/IV were identified in both data sets. Patients with multiple same lobe nodules had a 100% 5-year survival, which may be a reason to reevaluate their status in the IIB category in future analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the IASLC proposals for the 7th edition of TNM are helpful in predicting prognosis for broncho-pulmonary carcinoid tumors. It is the recommendation of the IASLC Staging project that TNM be applied to broncho-pulmonary carcinoid tumors. A prospective collection of data through an International Registry of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors planned by the IASLC will allow for further detailed analysis of staging data for broncho-pulmonary carcinoids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978555     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31818b06e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  60 in total

1.  Bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  [Pulmonary carcinoid tumors].

Authors:  H Prosch
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Prognostic value of the frequency of vascular invasion in stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Okada; Shinjiro Mizuguchi; Nobuhiro Izumi; Hiroaki Komatsu; Michihito Toda; Kantaro Hara; Takahiro Okuno; Toshihiko Shibata; Hideki Wanibuchi; Noritoshi Nishiyama
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-10-13

Review 4.  Therapeutic biomarkers in lung neuroendocrine neoplasia.

Authors:  Luisella Righi; Marco Volante; Ida Rapa; Simona Vatrano; Giuseppe Pelosi; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 5.  Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options.

Authors:  Hassan Lemjabbar-Alaoui; Omer Ui Hassan; Yi-Wei Yang; Petra Buchanan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-08-19

Review 6.  Lung cancer staging: clinical and radiologic perspectives.

Authors:  Sophie Chheang; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 7.  The role of multimodal treatment in patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Nicola Fazio; Antonio Ungaro; Francesca Spada; Chiara Alessandra Cella; Eleonora Pisa; Massimo Barberis; Chiara Grana; Dario Zerini; Emilio Bertani; Dario Ribero; Luigi Funicelli; Guido Bonomo; Davide Ravizza; Juliana Guarize; Filippo De Marinis; Francesco Petrella; Ester Del Signore; Giuseppe Pelosi; Lorenzo Spaggiari
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Lung neuroendocrine tumors: pathological characteristics.

Authors:  Luisella Righi; Gaia Gatti; Marco Volante; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Predicting the prognosis of lung cancer: the evolution of tumor, node and metastasis in the molecular age-challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Ramón Rami-Porta; Hisao Asamura; Peter Goldstraw
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

10.  EZH2 protein expression associates with the early pathogenesis, tumor progression, and prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Carmen Behrens; Luisa M Solis; Heather Lin; Ping Yuan; Ximing Tang; Humam Kadara; Erick Riquelme; Hector Galindo; Cesar A Moran; Neda Kalhor; Stephen G Swisher; George R Simon; David J Stewart; J Jack Lee; Ignacio I Wistuba
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.