Literature DB >> 18978227

Functional consequences of tooth design: effects of blade shape on energetics of cutting.

Philip S L Anderson1, Michael LaBarbera.   

Abstract

Dental structures capture, retain and fragment food for ingestion. Gnathostome dentition should be viewed in the context of the prey's material properties. Animal muscle and skin are mechanically tough materials that resist fragmentation unless energy is continually supplied directly to the tip of the fracture by some device such as a blade edge. Despite the variety of bladed tooth morphologies in gnathostomes, few studies have experimentally examined the effects of different blade designs on cutting efficiency. We tested the effects of blades with and without contained notches and in a 'fang' configuration on the force and energy required to fracture raw, unprocessed biological tissues (fish and shrimp) using a double guillotine device. Blade design strongly affects the work required to fragment biological tissues. A notched blade reduced the work to fracture of tissues tested by up to 600 J m(-2) (50% reduction). The specific angle of the notch had a significant effect, with acute angles more effectively reducing work to fracture. A bladed triangle matched to a notch reduced work to fracture more than a notch-straight blade pair. Strain patterns seen while cutting photoelastic gelatin indicate that the reduction in work to fracture with triangular and notched blades arises from a combination of 'trapping ability' and blade approach angle causing the material to fracture at lower overall strain levels. These results show that the notched blade designs found in a wide variety of vertebrate dentitions reduce the energy expenditure (and presumably handling time) when cutting tough prey materials like animal flesh.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978227     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.020586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Virtual experiments, physical validation: dental morphology at the intersection of experiment and theory.

Authors:  P S L Anderson; E J Rayfield
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The sharpest tools in the box? Quantitative analysis of conodont element functional morphology.

Authors:  David Jones; Alistair R Evans; Karen K W Siu; Emily J Rayfield; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Models in palaeontological functional analysis.

Authors:  Philip S L Anderson; Jen A Bright; Pamela G Gill; Colin Palmer; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Gene networks, occlusal clocks, and functional patches: new understanding of pattern and process in the evolution of the dentition.

Authors:  P David Polly
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  How to best smash a snail: the effect of tooth shape on crushing load.

Authors:  S B Crofts; A P Summers
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Point of impact: the effect of size and speed on puncture mechanics.

Authors:  P S L Anderson; J LaCosse; M Pankow
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Grand Challenges in Comparative Tooth Biology.

Authors:  C Darrin Hulsey; Karly E Cohen; Zerina Johanson; Nidal Karagic; Axel Meyer; Craig T Miller; Alexa Sadier; Adam P Summers; Gareth J Fraser
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  The functional significance of morphological changes in the dentitions of early mammals.

Authors:  Andrew J Conith; Michael J Imburgia; Alfred J Crosby; Elizabeth R Dumont
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Microstructured barbs on the North American porcupine quill enable easy tissue penetration and difficult removal.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Cho; James A Ankrum; Dagang Guo; Shawn A Chester; Seung Yun Yang; Anurag Kashyap; Georgina A Campbell; Robert J Wood; Ram K Rijal; Rohit Karnik; Robert Langer; Jeffrey M Karp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Comparative morphology and systematics of the cookiecutter sharks, genus Isistius Gill (1864) (Chondrichthyes: Squaliformes: Dalatiidae).

Authors:  Flávia de Figueiredo Petean; Marcelo R de Carvalho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.