Literature DB >> 18978106

Labor before a primary cesarean delivery: reduced risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean.

Charles S Algert1, Jonathan M Morris, Judy M Simpson, Jane B Ford, Christine L Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of the onset of labor before a primary cesarean delivery on the risk of uterine rupture if vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is attempted in the next pregnancy.
METHODS: Longitudinally linked birth records were used to follow women from a primary cesarean delivery to a trial of labor at term for their next birth. The effects of characteristics of both the trial of labor and primary cesarean deliveries on the risk of uterine rupture were examined.
RESULTS: Of 10,160 women who had a trial of labor, 39 (0.38%) had a uterine rupture. Women who were induced or augmented for their trial of labor had a greater relative risk (RR) of uterine rupture (crude RR 4.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23-8.07). Women whose primary cesarean delivery was planned or followed induction of labor also had an increased risk of uterine rupture (crude RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.24-5.49), and this risk remained after adjustment for other factors. Women with a history of either spontaneous labor or vaginal birth had one uterine rupture for every 460 deliveries; women without this history who required induction or augmentation to proceed with a VBAC attempt had one uterine rupture for every 95 deliveries.
CONCLUSION: Labor before the primary cesarean delivery can decrease the risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor. A history of primary cesarean delivery preceded by spontaneous labor is favorable for VBAC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18978106     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b42e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Medical student volunteerism and interest in working with underserved and vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Anna Joy G Rogers
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Pitfall in ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar from prior preterm cesarean section.

Authors:  Sarah-Maude B Laflamme; Nicole Jastrow; Mario Girard; Gaétan Paris; Laurie Bérubé; Emmanuel Bujold
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2011-07-22

3.  Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Kathrin Schemann; Jillian A Patterson; Tanya A Nippita; Jane B Ford; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Women's reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Does continuity of care impact decision making in the next birth after a caesarean section (VBAC)? a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Caroline S E Homer; Karyn Besley; Jennifer Bell; Deborah Davis; Jon Adams; Alison Porteous; Maralyn Foureur
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Vaginal birth after caesarean birth in Italy: variations among areas of residence and hospitals.

Authors:  Paola Colais; Katia Bontempi; Luigi Pinnarelli; Carlo Piscicelli; Ilenia Mappa; Danilo Fusco; Marina Davoli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.