Literature DB >> 18977536

Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography pachymetry mapping.

Yan Li1, David M Meisler, Maolong Tang, Ake T H Lu, Vishakha Thakrar, Bibiana J Reiser, David Huang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To detect abnormal corneal thinning in keratoconus using pachymetry maps measured by high-speed anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven keratoconic eyes from 21 subjects and 36 eyes from 18 normal subjects.
METHODS: The OCT system operated at a 1.3 microm wavelength with a scan rate of 2000 axial scans per second. A pachymetry scan pattern (8 radials, 128 axial scans each; 10 mm diameter) centered at the corneal vertex was used to map the corneal thickness. The pachymetry map was divided into zones by octants and annular rings. Five pachymetric parameters were calculated from the region inside the 5 mm diameter: minimum, minimum-median, inferior-superior (I-S), inferotemporal-superonasal (IT-SN), and the vertical location of the thinnest cornea. The 1-percentile value of the normal group was used to define the diagnostic cutoff. Placido-ring-based corneal topography was obtained for comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The OCT pachymetric parameters and a quantitative topographic keratoconus index (keratometry, I-S, astigmatism, and skew percentage [KISA%]) were used for keratoconus diagnosis. Diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AROC) curve.
RESULTS: Keratoconic corneas were thinner. The pachymetric minimum averaged 452.6+/-60.9 microm in keratoconic eyes versus 546+/-23.7 microm in normal eyes. The 1-percentile cutoff was 491.6 microm. The thinnest location was inferiorly displaced in keratoconus (-805+/-749 microm vs -118+/-260 microm; cutoff, -716 microm). The thinning was focal (minimum-median: -95.2+/-41.1 microm vs -45+/-7.7 microm; cutoff, -62.6 microm). Keratoconic maps were more asymmetric (I-S, -44.8+/-28.7 microm vs -9.9+/-9.3 microm; cutoff, -31.3 microm; and IT-SN, -63+/-35.7 microm vs -22+/-11.4 microm; cutoff, -48.2 microm). Keratoconic eyes had a higher KISA% index (2641+/-5024 vs 21+/-19). All differences were statistically significant (t test, P<0.0001). Applying the diagnostic criteria of any 1 OCT pachymetric parameter below the keratoconus cutoff yielded an AROC of 0.99, which was marginally better (P = .09) than the KISA% topographic index (AROC, 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS: Optical coherence tomography pachymetry maps accurately detected the characteristic abnormal corneal thinning in keratoconic eyes. This method was at least as sensitive and specific as the topographic KISA. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18977536      PMCID: PMC2652571          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  52 in total

1.  Automated decision tree classification of corneal shape.

Authors:  Michael D Twa; Srinivasan Parthasarathy; Cynthia Roberts; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Thomas W Raasch; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Characteristics of keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration in mean curvature maps.

Authors:  Maolong Tang; Raj Shekhar; Danielle Miranda; David Huang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Keratoconus staging with ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  T Avitabile; F Marano; F Castiglione; A Reibaldi
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Topographic pattern and apex location of keratoconus on elevation topography maps.

Authors:  N H Demirbas; S C Pflugfelder
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus.

Authors:  T Seiler; A W Quurke
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Accuracy of ultrasonic pachymetry and videokeratography in detecting keratoconus.

Authors:  Y S Rabinowitz; K Rasheed; H Yang; J Elashoff
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus.

Authors:  Y S Rabinowitz; K Rasheed
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Detection and classification of mild irregular astigmatism in patients with good visual acuity.

Authors:  N Maeda; S D Klyce; Y Tano
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Mean curvature mapping for detection of corneal shape abnormality.

Authors:  Maolong Tang; Raj Shekhar; David Huang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Screening patients with the corneal navigator.

Authors:  Stephen D Klyce; Michael D Karon; Michael K Smolek
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  52 in total

1.  Pachymetric mapping with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Maolong Tang; Xinbo Zhang; Camila H Salaroli; Jose L Ramos; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  A new, pachymetry-based approach for diagnostic cutoffs for normal, suspect and keratoconic cornea.

Authors:  G Prakash; A Agarwal; A I Mazhari; G Kumar; P Desai; D A Kumar; S Jacob; A Agarwal
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Four discriminant models for detecting keratoconus pattern using Zernike coefficients of corneal aberrations.

Authors:  Makoto Saika; Naoyuki Maeda; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Takashi Fujikado; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Optical coherence tomography combined with videokeratography to differentiate mild keratoconus subtypes.

Authors:  Yaron S Rabinowitz; Xiaohui Li; Ana Laura Caiado Canedo; Renato Ambrósio; Yelena Bykhovskaya
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work.

Authors:  Michelle L Gabriele; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Juan Xu; Lindsey S Folio; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Staging of development in Terrien's degeneration based on corneal curvatures detected by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Chun-Xiao Wang; Xiu-Fen Lian; Su-Juan Duan; David Huang; Shi-You Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis.

Authors:  Eric S Hwang; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; Sang Woo Kim; Marcony R Santhiago; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Topography and pachymetry maps for mouse corneas using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Alice S Liu; Dillon M Brown; Rachel E Conn; Ryan P McNabb; Machelle T Pardue; Anthony N Kuo
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Genetic association of COL5A1 variants in keratoconus patients suggests a complex connection between corneal thinning and keratoconus.

Authors:  Xiaohui Li; Yelena Bykhovskaya; Ana Laura Caiado Canedo; Talin Haritunians; David Siscovick; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta Szczotka-Flynn; Sudha K Iyengar; Jerome I Rotter; Kent D Taylor; Yaron S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  SD-OCT analysis of regional epithelial thickness profiles in keratoconus, postoperative corneal ectasia, and normal eyes.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; E Perez-Straziota; R Doyle Stulting; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.