Literature DB >> 18977345

KIT and FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase mutations in acute myeloid leukemia with favorable cytogenetics: two novel mutations and selective occurrence in leukemia subtypes and age groups.

Narongrit Sritana1, Chirayu U Auewarakul.   

Abstract

Mutations of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) are frequently reported in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a normal karyotype. In this study, Southeast Asian AML patients with a favorable karyotype including t(8;21)/AML-ETO, inv(16)(CBF beta/SMMHC), and t(15;17)/PML-RAR alpha were genotyped for KIT and FLT3 RTK mutations by PCR and sequencing. The combined frequency of KIT/FLT3 mutations in patients with t(8;21), inv(16) and t(15;17) was 35%, 18% and 41%. KIT mutations were mainly detected in patients with t(8;21) (23%) and undetectable in patients with t(15;17). Two novel KIT mutations were identified. FLT3 mutations were preferentially found in patients with t(15;17) (41%). Patients with inv(16) had a strikingly low frequency of both KIT and FLT3 mutations (9% each). KIT-mutated patients were older than FLT3-mutated patients and demonstrated a high expression of myeloid antigens and CD56 lymphoid antigen. FLT3 mutation was coexistent with PML-RAR alpha with markedly low or no CD11c and HLA-DR expression. KIT and FLT3 mutations preferentially exist in distinct clinical and genetic AML subtypes, reflecting unique leukemogenetic mechanisms. Targeting therapy with specific RTK inhibitors should provide benefits for a subgroup of AML patients with favorable chromosomes who also carry selective types of RTK mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18977345     DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol        ISSN: 0014-4800            Impact factor:   3.362


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and dose escalation of the heat shock protein inhibitor 17-allyamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in combination with bortezomib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Alison R Walker; Rebecca Klisovic; Jeffrey S Johnston; Yao Jiang; Susan Geyer; Cheryl Kefauver; Philip Binkley; John C Byrd; Michael R Grever; Ramiro Garzon; Mitch A Phelps; Guido Marcucci; Kristie A Blum; William Blum
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-01-24

Review 2.  Genetic tests to evaluate prognosis and predict therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Thomas C Shea; Yuri Fedoriw
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 3.  Molecular prognostic markers for adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics.

Authors:  Tara K Gregory; David Wald; Yichu Chen; Johanna M Vermaat; Yin Xiong; William Tse
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 17.388

4.  Acute myeloid leukemia with the t(8;21) translocation: clinical consequences and biological implications.

Authors:  Håkon Reikvam; Kimberley Joanne Hatfield; Astrid Olsnes Kittang; Randi Hovland; Øystein Bruserud
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05-03

Review 5.  An overview on the role of FLT3-tyrosine kinase receptor in acute myeloid leukemia: biology and treatment.

Authors:  Tiziana Grafone; Michela Palmisano; Chiara Nicci; Sergio Storti
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2012-04-17

6.  Differentiation therapy of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elzbieta Gocek; Ewa Marcinkowska
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  GAS6 expression identifies high-risk adult AML patients: potential implications for therapy.

Authors:  Michael A Caligiuri; Guido Marcucci; Clara D Bloomfield; Susan P Whitman; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Kati Maharry; Stefano Volinia; Krzysztof Mrózek; Deedra Nicolet; Sebastian Schwind; Heiko Becker; Klaus H Metzeler; Jason H Mendler; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Andrew J Carroll; Bayard L Powell; Thomas H Carter; Maria R Baer; Jonathan E Kolitz; Il-Kyoo Park; Richard M Stone
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 11.528

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.