Jussi Liippo1, Kaija Lammintausta. 1. Department of Dermatology, Turku University Hospital, Allergy Unit, PO Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland. jussi.liippo@tyks.fi
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A history of prolonged use of topical antimicrobials is common among patients with positive patch test reactions to gentamicin and to aminoglycosides. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to show sources of gentamicin sensitization in patients with positive patch test reactions to gentamicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: About 7814 patients were patch tested with a baseline patch test series and 620 of them were further tested with gentamicin. The clinical histories, concurrent contact sensitivities, and sources of sensitization are analysed among these patients. RESULTS: Positive patch test reactions to gentamicin were seen in 29/620 patients, most of whom (18/29) also reacted to neomycin and to kanamycin (7/29). Mean age of the gentamicin-positive patients was 62 years, but three young operating room nurses with hand dermatitis had a history of gentamicin exposure from bone cement. Among the 11/29 neomycin-negative patients, a history of exposure to different aminoglycosides was apparent, and one patient had a history of systemic netilmicin-medication-associated exanthema. CONCLUSIONS: Positive patch test reactions to gentamicin reflect sensitization to different aminoglycosides for which gentamicin seems to represent a sensitive indicator. Gentamicin sensitization may result from occupational exposure to gentamicin containing bone cements or from systemic medication with aminoglycosides.
BACKGROUND: A history of prolonged use of topical antimicrobials is common among patients with positive patch test reactions to gentamicin and to aminoglycosides. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to show sources of gentamicin sensitization in patients with positive patch test reactions to gentamicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: About 7814 patients were patch tested with a baseline patch test series and 620 of them were further tested with gentamicin. The clinical histories, concurrent contact sensitivities, and sources of sensitization are analysed among these patients. RESULTS: Positive patch test reactions to gentamicin were seen in 29/620 patients, most of whom (18/29) also reacted to neomycin and to kanamycin (7/29). Mean age of the gentamicin-positive patients was 62 years, but three young operating room nurses with hand dermatitis had a history of gentamicin exposure from bone cement. Among the 11/29 neomycin-negative patients, a history of exposure to different aminoglycosides was apparent, and one patient had a history of systemic netilmicin-medication-associated exanthema. CONCLUSIONS: Positive patch test reactions to gentamicin reflect sensitization to different aminoglycosides for which gentamicin seems to represent a sensitive indicator. Gentamicin sensitization may result from occupational exposure to gentamicin containing bone cements or from systemic medication with aminoglycosides.
Authors: Mario Sánchez-Borges; Bernard Thong; Miguel Blanca; Luis Felipe Chiaverini Ensina; Sandra González-Díaz; Paul A Greenberger; Edgardo Jares; Young-Koo Jee; Luciana Kase-Tanno; David Khan; Jung-Won Park; Werner Pichler; Antonino Romano; Maria José Torres Jaén Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 4.084
Authors: Benjamin Thomas; Maria Benedikt; Ali Alamri; Florian Kapp; Rainer Bader; Burkhard Summer; Peter Thomas; Eva Oppel Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 2.359