Literature DB >> 18976169

Perioperative complications of primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion for nonisthmic spondylolisthesis: analysis of risk factors.

Noboru Hosono1, Masato Namekata, Takahiro Makino, Toshitada Miwa, Takashi Kaito, Noriyoshi Kaneko, Takeshi Fuji.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Although posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is an excellent procedure to attain circumferential decompression, it is technically demanding and can lead to various surgical complications. The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with nonisthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent PLIF to reveal the incidence and risk factors for perioperative complications of PLIF.
METHODS: A total of 240 patients underwent PLIF. The fusion level was at L4-5 in 220, L3-4 in 18, and L5-S1 in 2. The medial walls of the fusion segment's facet joints were resected, and the VSP Spine System was used for the pedicle screw instrumentation. The operations were performed by 7 surgeons, who were divided into 4 groups according to their level of experience with spinal surgery.
RESULTS: The average operation time was 175 +/- 49 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 746 +/- 489 ml. A total of 90 patients (37.5%) experienced complications; 41 (17%) experienced transient neurological complications, and 18 (7.5%) experienced permanent neurological complications. The mean neurological score according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association improved from 14.3 +/- 3.8 to 24.7 +/- 4.0 in the patients without complications and from 14.8 +/- 3.6 to 24.0 +/- 3.9 in the patients with complications. Multivariate analysis concerning the relationship between complications and risk factors (operation time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and surgeon experience) revealed that operation time was the only significant risk factor for complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative complications of PLIF were more frequent in this homogeneous study group than in other studies of various implants. Total excision of the facet joints might preclude neurological complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18976169     DOI: 10.3171/SPI.2008.9.11.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  9 in total

1.  South Korean degenerative spondylolisthesis patients had surgical treatment at earlier age than Japanese, American, and European patients: a published literature observation.

Authors:  Zoltán Káplár; Yì-Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

2.  A comparative study of perioperative complications between transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Jiaming Liu; Huilin Deng; Xinhua Long; Xuanyin Chen; Risheng Xu; Zhili Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Review of Current Research.

Authors:  Min-Seok Kang; Dong Hwa Heo; Hyoung-Bok Kim; Heung-Tae Chung
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

4.  Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Two-Year Study Evaluating Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes With Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Graham Mulvaney; Steve Monk; Jonathan D Clemente; Deborah Pfortmiller; Domagoj Coric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

5.  Clinical and radiographic analysis of expandable versus static lateral lumbar interbody fusion devices with two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Richard F Frisch; Ingrid Y Luna; Daina M Brooks; Gita Joshua; Joseph R O'Brien
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

6.  Iatrogenic L5 Nerve Injury Following Decortication of the Sacral Ala in Posterolateral Lumbosacral Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Babak Pourabbas Tahvildari; Maziar Oveisee; Mohammad Farsimadan; Mehran Fereidooni; Mohammad Zarenezhad
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18

7.  AxiaLIF system: minimally invasive device for presacral lumbar interbody spinal fusion.

Authors:  Steven M Rapp; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-08-15

8.  Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion with direct psoas visualization.

Authors:  Philip S Yuan; Kasra Rowshan; Rohit B Verma; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Comparison of Different Approaches in Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Kaliye Mohamud; Jan Bredow; Stavros Oikonomidis; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-01-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.