Literature DB >> 18975356

Patterns of femorotibial cartilage loss in knees with neutral, varus, and valgus alignment.

Felix Eckstein1, Wolfgang Wirth, Martin Hudelmaier, Verena Stein, Verena Lengfelder, September Cahue, Meredith Marshall, Pottumarthi Prasad, Leena Sharma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Malalignment is known to alter medial-to-lateral femorotibial load distribution and to affect osteoarthritis (OA) progression in the mechanically stressed compartment. We investigated the pattern of cartilage loss in neutral, varus, and valgus knees.
METHODS: Alignment was measured from full-limb radiographs in 174 participants with symptomatic knee OA. Coronal magnetic resonance images were acquired at baseline and a mean +/- SD of 26.6 +/- 5.4 months later. The weight-bearing femorotibial cartilages were segmented from paired images. Cartilage volume, surface area, and thickness were determined in total cartilage plates and defined subregions using proprietary software.
RESULTS: The medial-to-lateral ratio of femorotibial cartilage loss was 1.4:1 in neutral knees (n = 74), 3.7:1 in varus knees (n = 57), and 1:6.0 in valgus knees (n = 43). The relative contribution of cartilage thickness change tended to be greater in knees with mild cartilage loss, whereas the increase of denuded area was greater in knees with accelerated cartilage loss. In both varus and neutral knees, the greatest changes were observed in the same subregions of the medial femorotibial compartment (central and external medial tibia, and central medial femur). In valgus and neutral knees, the subregions with the greatest changes in the lateral femorotibial compartment were also similar (internal and central lateral tibia, external lateral femur).
CONCLUSION: The medial-to-lateral rate of femorotibial cartilage loss strongly depended on alignment. Subregions of greater-than-average cartilage loss within the stressed compartment were, however, similar in neutral, varus, and valgus knees. This indicates that the medial-to-lateral loading pattern is different, but that the (sub)regional loading pattern may not differ substantially between neutral and malaligned knees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18975356     DOI: 10.1002/art.24208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  44 in total

1.  Comparison of 1-year vs 2-year change in regional cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis results from 346 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  W Wirth; S Larroque; R Y Davies; M Nevitt; A Gimona; F Baribaud; J H Lee; O Benichou; B T Wyman; M Hudelmaier; S Maschek; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Anita E Wluka; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

3.  Varus-valgus alignment: reduced risk of subsequent cartilage loss in the less loaded compartment.

Authors:  Kirsten Moisio; Alison Chang; Felix Eckstein; Joan S Chmiel; Wolfgang Wirth; Orit Almagor; Pottumarthi Prasad; September Cahue; Ami Kothari; Leena Sharma
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-04

4.  The association between patellar alignments features and tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ahmet Özgül; Zafer Günendi; Serdar Kesikburun; Özlem Köroğlu Omaç; Mehmet Ali Taşkaynatan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  A method for registration of full-limb radiographs to knee MRI.

Authors:  Anish Ghodadra; Morgan H Jones; Anthony Miniaci; Carl S Winalski
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Longitudinal Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Measures of Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness as a Function of Alignment and Obesity: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Rebecca Moyer; Wolfgang Wirth; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Does joint alignment affect the T2 values of cartilage in patients with knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Klaus M Friedrich; Timothy Shepard; Gregory Chang; Ligong Wang; James S Babb; Mark Schweitzer; Ravinder Regatte
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Denuded subchondral bone and knee pain in persons with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kirsten Moisio; Felix Eckstein; Joan S Chmiel; Ali Guermazi; Pottumarthi Prasad; Orit Almagor; Jing Song; Dorothy Dunlop; Martin Hudelmaier; Ami Kothari; Leena Sharma
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-12

9.  Development and validation of self-reported line drawings for assessment of knee malalignment and foot rotation: a cross-sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Sarah L Ingham; Amanda Moody; Abhishek Abhishek; Sally A Doherty; Weiya Zhang; Michael Doherty
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Relationship of compartment-specific structural knee status at baseline with change in cartilage morphology: a prospective observational study using data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Wolfgang Wirth; Martin I Hudelmaier; Susanne Maschek; Wolfgang Hitzl; Bradley T Wyman; Michael Nevitt; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; David Hunter
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.