Literature DB >> 18975346

Certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate is significantly more effective than placebo plus methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis: findings of a fifty-two-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

Edward Keystone1, Désireé van der Heijde, David Mason, Robert Landewé, Ronald Van Vollenhoven, Bernard Combe, Paul Emery, Vibeke Strand, Philip Mease, Chintu Desai, Karel Pavelka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosage regimens of lyophilized certolizumab pegol (a novel PEGylated anti-tumor necrosis factor agent) as adjunctive therapy to methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to MTX therapy alone.
METHODS: In this 52-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, 982 patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive treatment with subcutaneous certolizumab pegol at an initial dosage of 400 mg given at weeks 0, 2, and 4, with a subsequent dosage of 200 mg or 400 mg given every 2 weeks, plus MTX, or placebo plus MTX. Co-primary end points were the response rate at week 24 according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement (ACR20) and the mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score at week 52.
RESULTS: At week 24, ACR20 response rates using nonresponder imputation for the certolizumab pegol 200-mg and 400-mg groups were 58.8% and 60.8%, respectively, as compared with 13.6% for the placebo group. Differences in ACR20 response rates versus placebo were significant at week 1 and were sustained to week 52 (P < 0.001). At week 52, mean radiographic progression from baseline was reduced in patients treated with certolizumab pegol 200 mg (0.4 Sharp units) or 400 mg (0.2 Sharp units) as compared with that in placebo-treated patients (2.8 Sharp units) (P < 0.001 by rank analysis). Improvements in all ACR core set of disease activity measures, including physical function, were observed by week 1 with both certolizumab pegol dosage regimens. Most adverse events were mild or moderate.
CONCLUSION: Treatment with certolizumab pegol 200 or 400 mg plus MTX resulted in a rapid and sustained reduction in RA signs and symptoms, inhibited the progression of structural joint damage, and improved physical function as compared with placebo plus MTX treatment in RA patients with an incomplete response to MTX.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18975346     DOI: 10.1002/art.23964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  190 in total

1.  [Treatment of patients with destructive arthritis with certolizumab pegol].

Authors:  T Schmeiser; U Müller-Ladner
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  Safety of biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Robert S Woodrick; Eric M Ruderman
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  Cost utility of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: an application of Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in a Markov model.

Authors:  Christine M Nguyen; Mark Bounthavong; Margaret A S Mendes; Melissa L D Christopher; Josephine N Tran; Rashid Kazerooni; Anthony P Morreale
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Safety Profile of Certolizumab Pegol in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alice Capogrosso Sansone; Stefania Mantarro; Marco Tuccori; Elisa Ruggiero; Sabrina Montagnani; Irma Convertino; Alessandra Marino; Matteo Fornai; Luca Antonioli; Tiberio Corona; Danila Garibaldi; Corrado Blandizzi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Certolizumab pegol: a new biologic targeting rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Aarat M Patel; Larry W Moreland
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Injection-site burning and stinging in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using injectable biologics.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Coburn Hobar; Kevin Hansbrough
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 7.  Infectious complications associated with monoclonal antibodies and related small molecules.

Authors:  Edsel Maurice T Salvana; Robert A Salata
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  [Phase IV non-interventional studies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologicals in Germany : real-life clinical practice data].

Authors:  J Ruof; C Iking-Konert; S Simianer; G-R Burmester
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 9.  Leveling the field in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic therapies: equal access for equal efficacy.

Authors:  Anthony S Russell; Wojtek P Olszynski; K S Davison; Cheryl Koehn; Boulos Haraoui
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 10.  Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Glen S Hazlewood; Cheryl Barnabe; George Tomlinson; Deborah Marshall; Daniel J A Devoe; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.