Literature DB >> 18975106

Late negativity in visual evoked potentials in humans to changes in the topology of simple nonverbal stimuli.

A Ya Kaplan1, E V Levichkina.   

Abstract

Late negativity arising in evoked potentials to semantic mismatching of sequentially presented stimuli is usually linked with verbal or symbolic representations of stimuli during the process of perception. The present studies showed that the late negativity characteristic of semantic mismatch arises even in the context of non-symbolic and nonverbal stimuli, for example, stimuli consisting of four points differing only in terms of topology or angular size. Distraction of attention from the test stimuli completely eliminated the late negativity effect. It is suggested that any stimulus composition can have semantic (meaning) and formal (shape, pattern) descriptions which, when stimuli are compared using the oddball paradigm, result in various levels of the N400 component depending on the amount of attention paid to the stimuli themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18975106     DOI: 10.1007/s11055-008-9074-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0097-0549


  8 in total

1.  Communicating hands: ERPs elicited by meaningful symbolic hand postures.

Authors:  Thomas C Gunter; Patric Bach
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: a biological approach.

Authors:  Boris Kotchoubey
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Shifting attention between global features and small details: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  B Kotchoubey; E Wascher; R Verleger
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1997-06-20       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming.

Authors:  S Bentin; G McCarthy; C C Wood
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-04

5.  Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition.

Authors:  S Bentin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Jan 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the Event-Related Potential.

Authors:  Salil H Patel; Pierre N Azzam
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.