BACKGROUND: India is a signatory to the World Health Organization resolution on Vision 2020: The right to sight. Efforts of all stakeholders have resulted in increased number of cataract surgeries performed in India, but the impact of these efforts on the elimination of avoidable blindness is unknown. AIMS: Projection of performance of cataract surgery over the next 15 years to determine whether India is likely to eliminate cataract blindness by 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from three national level blindness surveys in India over three decades, and projected age-specific population till 2020 from US Census Bureau were used to develop a model to predict the magnitude of cataract blindness and impact of Vision 2020: the right to sight initiatives. RESULTS: Using age-specific data for those aged 50+ years it was observed that prevalence of blindness at different age cohorts (above 50 years) reduced over three decades with a peak in 1989. Projections show that among those aged 50+ years, the quantum of cataract surgery would double (3.38 million in 2001 to 7.63 million in 2020) and cataract surgical rate would increase from 24025/million 50+ in 2001 to 27817/million 50+ in 2020. Though the prevalence of cataract blindness would decrease, the absolute number of cataract blind would increase from 7.75 million in 2001 to 8.25 million in 2020 due to a substantial increase in the population above 50 years in India over this period. CONCLUSIONS: Considering existing prevalence and projected incidence of cataract blindness over the period 2001-2020, visual outcomes after cataract surgery and sight restoration rate, elimination of cataract blindness may not be achieved by 2020 in India.
BACKGROUND: India is a signatory to the World Health Organization resolution on Vision 2020: The right to sight. Efforts of all stakeholders have resulted in increased number of cataract surgeries performed in India, but the impact of these efforts on the elimination of avoidable blindness is unknown. AIMS: Projection of performance of cataract surgery over the next 15 years to determine whether India is likely to eliminate cataract blindness by 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from three national level blindness surveys in India over three decades, and projected age-specific population till 2020 from US Census Bureau were used to develop a model to predict the magnitude of cataract blindness and impact of Vision 2020: the right to sight initiatives. RESULTS: Using age-specific data for those aged 50+ years it was observed that prevalence of blindness at different age cohorts (above 50 years) reduced over three decades with a peak in 1989. Projections show that among those aged 50+ years, the quantum of cataract surgery would double (3.38 million in 2001 to 7.63 million in 2020) and cataract surgical rate would increase from 24025/million 50+ in 2001 to 27817/million 50+ in 2020. Though the prevalence of cataract blindness would decrease, the absolute number of cataract blind would increase from 7.75 million in 2001 to 8.25 million in 2020 due to a substantial increase in the population above 50 years in India over this period. CONCLUSIONS: Considering existing prevalence and projected incidence of cataract blindness over the period 2001-2020, visual outcomes after cataract surgery and sight restoration rate, elimination of cataract blindness may not be achieved by 2020 in India.
Cataract has been documented to be the most significant cause
of bilateral blindness in India where vision < 20/200 in the
better eye on presentation is defined as blindness.1-6
In India cataract has been reported to be responsible for 50-80% of
the bilaterally blind in the country.1-6 Global
agencies for the elimination of avoidable blindness have pledged support to
operationalizing strategies to reduce the burden of cataractblindness by the ″Vision 2020: The right to sight″ initiative.7
Coordinated national efforts were supplemented by a world
bank-assisted cataract blindness control project which was
launched in seven states of India in 1994.8 From around 1.2
million cataract surgeries per year in the 1980s,9 the cataract
surgical output increased to 3.9 million per year by 2003.10
Recent data from the World Health Organization (WHO) shows
that there is a 25% decrease in blindness prevalence in India.11
This could be due to the increased cataract surgeries in the
country. At the same time the proportion of the aged has also
increased significantly in the country. The 60+ population which
stood at 56 million in 1991 will double by 2016.12 This increase
in population means that the population ′at-risk′ of blinding
cataract will also increase tremendously. India is committed to
the goal of elimination of avoidable blindness by 2020 in line
with the Global Vision 2020: the right to sight initiative. We
used existing surveys, cataract surgical output, and population
data, to determine whether India can meet the Vision 2020: the
right to sight cataract blindness goals.
Materials and Methods
Three national level surveys have been undertaken in India
over the past three decades. The first survey was done in
1971-74 and the results of this survey led to the inception of
the National Program for Control of Blindness in 1976.6 The
second survey was done over the period 1986-89 to evaluate
the impact of the National Program.5 Based on the findings
of this survey, control of cataract blindness was given the
highest priority and a world bank-assisted cataract blindness
control program was initiated in 1994.8 To assess the impact
of the new strategies adopted, a survey was undertaken in 15
districts (one district each in all the major Indian States) over
the period 1999-2001.13A model was developed to predict the magnitude of cataractblindness and the impact of the Vision 2020: the right to sight
initiative in India over the period 1989 to 2020. The following
inputs were considered for this purpose:The total population and the age-specific population was
determined using Census of India data for 1971, 1991 and
2001.14-16 Future projections of population trends
were obtained from the US Census Bureau.17Data on the number of cataract surgeries performed in the
country over the past two decades were available from
the Govt. of India.18,19 These figures were used to
calculate cataract surgical rate (CSR) per million population.Available unpublished data from sentinel surveillance units
in India shows that 11% of cataract surgery is performed
before the age of 50 years.20 Therefore, in projecting the
cataract surgery above the age of 50 years, a correction of
10% was made to the total cataract surgeries in the country.
It was assumed that this would remain constant till 2020.CSR is defined as:21Total number of cataract surgeries performed / Total
population × 1,000,000.Conventionally, a rate as defined in epidemiology has a
numerator which is related to and derived from the denominator
and has a specific time dimension (such as one year). As against
′rates′, CSR is a proportion, where the numerator may not be
derived from the denominator.22Therefore it was felt that using
the 50+ population as the denominator rather than the whole
population would be more appropriate as cataract blindness
and cataract surgery are commonly seen above the age of 50
years. Therefore a new indicator was defined and labeled as
″CSR 50+″. This indicator was defined as:Total number of cataract surgeries performed / Total 50+
population × 1,000,000- Data available in India shows that all cataract surgeries
are not sight-restoring surgeries as nearly 40-50% surgeries
are done in individuals with a vision > 20/200 in the better
eye.23 Therefore it was felt that in interpreting the data on
CSR, the proportion of sight restoration surgeries should also
be considered. This is important as Vision 2020 targets the
bilaterally blind as the immediate priority. Sight restoration
rate (SRR) is defined as:24Persons blind preoperatively (minus) - Persons blind
postoperatively × 100
Total persons operated
Available data shows that there is a decrease in the
prevalence of cataract blindness above 50 years of age from
7.6% in 19895 to 5.3% in 2001.13 In
estimating the cataract blindness rates at different time periods, age-specific
prevalence rates in the 1989 and 2001 surveys were used to
estimate the number of cataract blind in the country over
the period 2005-2020 [Table 1].
Table 1
Available data on blindness and cataract blindness in India
Computing the age-specific prevalence rates of cataractblindness it was observed that over the period 1989-2001,
there was a 32% reduction in the prevalence of cataractblindness at age 50-59 years, 54% reduction at ages 60-
69 and 22% reduction at ages 70+ years over a one-year
period. It has been assumed that this trend will continue
till 2020.The 50+ population has increased from 13%
in 1991 to 13.7% in 2001;14,15 The US Census
Bureau projections of Indian population in different age cohorts (50-59 years; 60-69 years;
70+ years) were used to estimate the population of different
age groups over the period 2005-2020.17 These projections
use life table techniques to adjust for the mortality that
would be experienced by this population in the future.The CSR in 1989-1990 in India was 1342/million while in
2001 it was 3620/million.18 This has further increased to
4500 per million population in 2005.19The available figures for cataract surgery in India over the
period 1989-2005, show that there has been an increase of
238,000 surgeries per year over the 16-year period. These
figures have then been used to calculate the projected CSR
over the period 2005-2020. Age-specific CSR data is not
available in India.
Results
Data available from three national level surveys in India was
used to project the estimates of cataract blindness in the country.
The surveys done in the seventies6 and eighties5
included the general population while the most recent survey included
only those aged 50 years or above.13 Using the age-specific
data for those aged 50 years and above from all three surveys,
it was observed that the prevalence of blindness at different
age cohorts above the age of 50 years changed over the three
decades with a peak in cataract blindness prevalence rates in
1989 [Table 1]. The prevalence of blindness (presenting vision
< 20/200) was observed to be 8.5% [95% CI: 8.1 - 8.9] in the
recent survey.13 It appears that there is a declining trend over the
period 1989-2001. Extrapolating the observations to the entire
country it was estimated that in 2001, there were 7.75 million
individuals whose blindness could be attributed to cataract
and this would increase to 8.25 million by 2020 [Table 2]. There
is an increase in the total number of cataract blind in the age
group above 70 years, over the period 2001-2020 as against a
decrease in the other age groups. By 2020, the prevalence of
cataract blindness in the population aged 70+ will be four times
higher than the prevalence of cataract blindness in other age
groups, while the population in this age bracket increases by
108% over the period 2001-2020 [Table 2].
Table 2
Estimated number of cataract blind in India (2001-2020)
It was observed that the number of cataract blind per million
people aged 50 years and above would decrease from 53000
per million to 30088 per million by 2020 when prevalent cases
of cataract blind are considered [Table 3].
Table 3
Projected estimates of cataract blindness and cataract surgical rate over the period 1989-2020
If only the prevalence of cataract blind and the CSR above
the age of 50 years is considered, India would be placed in a
comfortable position for eliminating cataract blindness by 2020
[Figure 1]. However, if the incidence of cataract blindness and
the number of surgeries on those already blind are considered
among the 50+, there would be a big gap between the actual
need and the surgical output in the country [Figure 1].
Figure 1
Cataract blindness and surgery projections per million 50+
Discussion
At the turn of the century, WHO and the International Agency
for Prevention of Blindness launched the Vision 2020: the right
to sight initiative.21 The most recent estimates from WHO reveal
that 47.8% of global blindness is due to cataract and in South
Asia region which includes India, 51% of blindness is due to
cataract.25 Since cataract is a major cause of avoidable blindness
in the developing countries, the key to the success of the Global
Vision 2020: the right to sight initiative is a special effort to
tackle cataract blindness.7 Cataract surgery has been viewed as
one of the most cost-effective health interventions with a cost
of disability-adjusted life years saved of US $ 20-40.25Cataract surgical rate is a quantifiable measure of the
delivery of cataract services in a country.24,25 It
is thus a good indicator of how well a country is organizing its efforts in
tackling cataract-related blindness. There has been a substantial
increase in CSR in India especially after the inception of the
World Bank-supported Cataract Blindness Control Project.8
Professional interest and technological upgradation of skills
and the availability of affordable equipment and intraocular
lenses have all fuelled the increase in cataract surgery in India.
A CSR of 3000 was targeted under Vision 2020: the right to
sight, for India, by the year 2000.25 Current trends show that this
target has been achieved, but still there are regional disparities
across the country. The CSR for the year 2002-03 ranges from
a high of 8440 per million population to a low of 130 per
million population.10 Most of the bigger states in the country
have already achieved a CSR of > 4000 per million population.
The states of Gujarat (8440), Puducherry (7440), Tamil Nadu
(5920) Andhra Pradesh (5260), Delhi (5090), Punjab (4950),
Maharashtra (4840), Karnataka (4560) and Haryana (4180) have
already gone past the recommended norm for Vision 2020: the
right to sight.10 In view of this encouraging performance, it is
very likely that the entire country can achieve a CSR of 6000
+ per million population by 2020. This increased performance
will reduce the prevalence of blindness and severe visual
impairment in the country as half the blindness in India is
attributable to cataract.13In epidemiologic parlance, a ′true′ rate is a proportion and
is defined as the presence or absence of a characteristic in a
group of people among people who are at risk of developing
the particular disease during a specific time period.22 Therefore
the denominator should comprise only individuals in the
population who are at risk of developing the disease. In
such a case, the denominator of the general population is
not appropriate for defining CSR as the younger population
would not be at risk of age-related cataract. It is therefore
recommended that since most blinding cataract occurs after
the age of 50 years, the denominator for CSR should consist
only of the 50+ population.If CSR per million 50+ population is considered, then by
2020, elimination of avoidable blindness due to cataract does
not seem to be possible [Table 2]. In addition, if the incidence of
new cataract blind individuals is added to the prevalent cases,
it appears that India would be a long way off from eliminating
avoidable blindness due to cataract by 2020 [Figure 1].If 30% continue to remain blind after cataract surgery, then
the CSR/ million 50+ will need to increase by a third at different
time periods.The situation gets compounded further if in addition to the
above parameters, sight restoration is considered, and only
60% of all cataract surgeries are done on the blind, then the
elimination of avoidable blindness due to cataract appears to
be a dream in India unless a significant proportion of the 50+
have been ′prevented′ from going blind by operating at better
visual acuity [Figure 1] and by ensuring a better postoperative
outcome.Cataract surgical coverage (CSC) is an efficient indicator
for planning as it provides information on what proportion
of those needing surgery have been covered and therefore is
a good indicator of the work remaining. However, CSC needs
population-based surveys to provide information which is not
easily available as against CSR which is most readily available.
It is difficult to say if there is any over-reporting in cataract
surgery when information is compiled at the national level. For
the present study, it has been assumed that this is a reasonably
accurate description of the existing situation.In our opinion, it is important to look at what proportion of
cataract surgeries actually lead to a decrease in blind people
(presenting vision < 20/200 in the better eye) after surgery
compared to their preoperative status. Other researchers also
consider that monitoring sight restoration rate is very important
for planning at the national level.24,26 This is
important because the Vision 2020:the right to sight approach is targeted towards
the bilaterally blind. Surgeries on people who have a presenting
vision better than 20/200, surgeries on the second eyes, and
surgeries on the unilaterally blind would not help in restoring
vision though they have a role in preventing future blindness
and should not be accounted for when monitoring progress
towards the goal of elimination of avoidable blindness due
to cataract. For the immediate future when a significant
proportion of the 50+ are blind, the first priority should be given
to restoring vision to those already blind. Therefore, it would
be more meaningful to monitor sight restoration in addition
to CSR/ million population and CSR/ million 50+ population
to monitor progress towards Vision 2020. Recent evidence in
India suggests that the visual outcomes after cataract surgery
are not very good in some regions wherein the operated people
continue to remain blind after surgery. Poor visual outcome has
been reported in 15-25% of eyes following cataract surgery.23
A study in southern Indian reported poor or very poor visual
outcome after cataract surgery in 51.9% of the operated eyes.27
Another study in northern India showed that one-third of
the eyes which had a preoperative vision of less than 20/200
continued to have vision less than 20/200 with best correction
after cataract surgery.28 A study in Mysore, India, demonstrated
that more than one-third were blind in the operated eye.29
Improving the quality of surgery is a major input that needs
to be emphasized now that the quantity of surgery has been
increased. This along with improved SRR will be more effective
in eliminating cataract blindness.The projections have been made using a simple dynamic
model using Microsoft Excel software considering assumptions
as mentioned. If the assumptions change, then the projections
would also change. Age-specific mortality has been used to
project future population in different age cohorts and it is
assumed that most of the surgical patterns and outcomes will
remain constant to a large extent.Most literature concentrates on the prevalence of cataractblindness in projecting future trends. However it is also
important to consider the newly blinded individuals (incident
cases of cataract blindness) as they would also need to be
treated. The backlog of cataract blindness can be tackled
effectively only if the incident cases are also accounted for.
Unfortunately, estimates of incidence of cataract blindness are
difficult to obtain because of the long duration of the disease
and the uncertainty of the pace of progression to blindness in
cataract. Conventionally, it has been stated that the incidence
of cataract blindness is 20% of prevalence.30,31 Studies in South Africa and India have documented that the incidence
ranges between 23-30% of prevalence.9,32,33 Assuming that the
incidence of newly blinded cataract is 20%, it appears that
the present number of cataract surgeries need to be scaled up
significantly if the elimination of avoidable cataract blindness
is to be a reality by 2020. It needs to be emphasized that
outcome measures like CSR and CSR 50+, by themselves are
inadequate to describe the benefit to the operated individuals
and their quality of life. More widespread use of indicators
like SRR and developing sensitive indicators for assessment of
visual function after surgery should be effectively used in the
future. At the same time, other causes of avoidable blindness
need to be given adequate attention. Even if we get a handle
on cataract blindness, we are actually at the beginning and not
the end of the process.As may be evident, this study faces a few limitations. About
10% of the cataract surgeries are done on patients <50 years
of age and this trend may increase with increased incidence
of diabetes, increase in posterior subcapsular cataract and
improved phacoemulsification surgery penetration in India.
More number of people would be operated upon sooner than
they are today. Data from three surveys conducted in India
have been used in this study. Different methodologies were
used in these surveys, and any inappropriate estimation in
these surveys could affect the comparability of their findings in
this study. The CSR and SRR suffer from the fact that they are
based on reported figures whose validity or accuracy cannot be
scrutinized. Some program managers suggest that the incidence
of cataract in India has been overestimated.34 If this is true, it
may be easier to achieve the targets for elimination of avoidable
blindness due to cataract in India as would improving visual
outcomes after cataract surgery which is eminently feasible in
the immediate future.
Authors: L Dandona; R Dandona; T J Naduvilath; C A McCarty; P Mandal; M Srinivas; A Nanda; G N Rao Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Serge Resnikoff; Donatella Pascolini; Daniel Etya'ale; Ivo Kocur; Ramachandra Pararajasegaram; Gopal P Pokharel; Silvio P Mariotti Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Cassandra L Thiel; Emily Schehlein; Thulasiraj Ravilla; R D Ravindran; Alan L Robin; Osamah J Saeedi; Joel S Schuman; Rengaraj Venkatesh Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Shaheen P Shah; Clare E Gilbert; Claire E Gilbert; Hessom Razavi; Elizabeth L Turner; Robert J Lindfield Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Ronnie George; Hemamalini Arvind; M Baskaran; S Ve Ramesh; Prema Raju; Lingam Vijaya Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.848
Authors: Robert P Finger; David G Kupitz; Eva Fenwick; Bharath Balasubramaniam; Ramanathan V Ramani; Frank G Holz; Clare E Gilbert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240