Literature DB >> 18974485

Correlation between biofilm production and multiple drug resistance in imipenem resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii.

R Srinivasa Rao1, R Uma Karthika, S P Singh, P Shashikala, R Kanungo, S Jayachandran, K Prashanth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the qualitative and quantitative methods for the investigation of biofilm formation and to examine the correlation between biofilm and antibiotic resistance among the clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii . We also verified the association between biofilm and presence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases, particularly, bla PER-1 .
METHODS: A total of 55 isolates were subjected to susceptibility testing by disc diffusion method for 13 clinically relevant antibiotics. Screening for biofilm production was done by both qualitative and quantitative methods through tube and microtitre plate assay respectively. The presence of bla PER-1 was checked by PCR.
RESULTS: A. baumannii isolates showed very high resistance (>75%) to imipenem, cephotaxime, amikacin and ciprofloxacin. Only cefoperazone, netillin and norfloxacin were found to be effective agents. Results of microtitre and tube methods were concordant with 34 isolates (62%) showing biofilm formation. Resistance to four antibiotics such as amikacin (82% vs. 17.6%, P < 0.001), cephotaxime (88% vs. 11%, P P < 0.001), ciprofloxacin (70% vs. 29%, P =0.005) and aztreonam (38% vs. 11%, P =0.039) was comparatively higher among biofilm producers than non-biofilm producers. Microtitre assay additionally detected 14 weakly adherent isolates. Only 11 isolates had bla PER-1 gene and among these two were strong biofilm producers, while remaining were weakly adherent isolates.
CONCLUSION: Microtitre plate method was found to be a more sensitive method for biofilm detection. This study demonstrates a high propensity among the clinical isolates of A. baumannii to form biofilm and a significant association of biofilms with multiple drug resistance. Presence of bla PER-1 appears to be more critical for cell adherence than for biofilm formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18974485     DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.43566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0255-0857            Impact factor:   0.985


  48 in total

1.  Use of a stainless steel washer platform to study Acinetobacter baumannii adhesion and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces.

Authors:  Samantha J Orsinger-Jacobsen; Shenan S Patel; Ernestine M Vellozzi; Phillip Gialanella; Leonardo Nimrichter; Kildare Miranda; Luis R Martinez
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 2.  Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Maria Magana; Christina Sereti; Anastasios Ioannidis; Courtney A Mitchell; Anthony R Ball; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Michael R Hamblin; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; George P Tegos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Global Dynamic Proteome Study of a Pellicle-forming Acinetobacter baumannii Strain.

Authors:  Takfarinas Kentache; Ahmed Ben Abdelkrim; Thierry Jouenne; Emmanuelle Dé; Julie Hardouin
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Study on biofilm formation in burn wound infection in a pediatric hospital in Chennai, India.

Authors:  M Ramakrishnan; S Putli Bai; M Babu
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-12-31

5.  Biofilm Producing Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: An Emerging Challenge.

Authors:  Gitanjali Kailas Badave; Dhananjay Kulkarni
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-01-01

6.  Acinetobacter baumannii biofilms: variations among strains and correlations with other cell properties.

Authors:  Christin N McQueary; Luis A Actis
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  Disruption of tetR type regulator adeN by mobile genetic element confers elevated virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Rajagopalan Saranathan; Sudhakar Pagal; Ajit R Sawant; Archana Tomar; M Madhangi; Suresh Sah; Annapurna Satti; K P Arunkumar; K Prashanth
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.882

8.  Synergistic effects and antibiofilm properties of chimeric peptides against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains.

Authors:  Ramamourthy Gopal; Young Gwon Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Seog Ki Lee; Jeong Don Chae; Byoung Kwan Son; Chang Ho Seo; Yoonkyung Park
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Regulation of Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Gaddy; Luis A Actis
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.165

10.  Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: differential adherence to HEp-2 and A-549 cells.

Authors:  Gabrielle Limeira Genteluci; Daniela Betzler Cardoso Gomes; Daniella Pereira; Marta de Campos Neves; Maria José de Souza; Karyne Rangel; Maria Helena Simões Villas Bôas
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.