Literature DB >> 18974417

The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC.

D L H Hunter1.   

Abstract

The history of the National Health Service research ethics system in the UK and some of the key drivers for its change into the present system are described. It is suggested that the key drivers were the unnecessary delay of research, the complexity of the array of processes and contradictions between research ethics committee (REC) decisions. It is then argued that the primary drivers for this change are and will be replicated by the systems of research ethics review being put in place at UK universities in response to the Economic and Social Research Council research ethics framework. It is argued that this is particularly problematic for multi-centre review and for researchers who switch institutions. Finally, some potential solutions to this problem and their feasibility are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18974417     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.024257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Can significant differences in regulating medical and non-medical research be justified?

Authors:  David Hunter
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

2.  Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective.

Authors:  Hanna Ezzat; Sue Ross; Peter von Dadelszen; Tara Morris; Robert Liston; Laura A Magee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.