BACKGROUND: The term "transrenal DNA" was coined in 2000 to signify that DNA in urine may come from the passage of plasma DNA through the kidney barrier. Although DNA in the urine has the potential to provide a completely noninvasive source of nucleic acids for molecular diagnosis, its existence remains controversial. METHODS: We obtained blood and urine samples from 22 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients and used fluorescence in situ hybridization, PCR for short tandem repeats, mass spectrometry, quantitative PCR, and immunofluorescence detection to study donor-derived DNA in the urine. RESULTS: All HSCT recipients exhibited high amounts of donor-derived DNA in buffy coat and plasma samples. Male donor-derived DNA was detected in supernatants of urine samples from all 5 female sex-mismatched HSCT recipients. Surprisingly, the amount of DNA in urine supernatants was not correlated with the plasma value. Moreover, cell-free urine supernatants contained DNA fragments >350 bp that were absent in plasma. Donor-derived polymorphs were detected in urine by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Coincidentally, donor-derived cytokeratin-producing epithelial cells were discovered in urine samples from 3 of 10 sex-mismatched HSCT recipients as long as 14.2 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This report is the first to demonstrate the presence of donor-derived DNA in the urine of HSCT recipients; however, we show that much of this DNA originates from donor-derived cells, rather than from the transrenal passage of cell-free plasma DNA. Our discovery of donor-derived cytokeratin-producing epithelial cells raises interesting biological and therapeutic implications, e.g., the capacity of marrow stem cells to serve as an extrarenal source for renal tubule regeneration.
BACKGROUND: The term "transrenal DNA" was coined in 2000 to signify that DNA in urine may come from the passage of plasma DNA through the kidney barrier. Although DNA in the urine has the potential to provide a completely noninvasive source of nucleic acids for molecular diagnosis, its existence remains controversial. METHODS: We obtained blood and urine samples from 22 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients and used fluorescence in situ hybridization, PCR for short tandem repeats, mass spectrometry, quantitative PCR, and immunofluorescence detection to study donor-derived DNA in the urine. RESULTS: All HSCT recipients exhibited high amounts of donor-derived DNA in buffy coat and plasma samples. Male donor-derived DNA was detected in supernatants of urine samples from all 5 female sex-mismatched HSCT recipients. Surprisingly, the amount of DNA in urine supernatants was not correlated with the plasma value. Moreover, cell-free urine supernatants contained DNA fragments >350 bp that were absent in plasma. Donor-derived polymorphs were detected in urine by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Coincidentally, donor-derived cytokeratin-producing epithelial cells were discovered in urine samples from 3 of 10 sex-mismatched HSCT recipients as long as 14.2 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This report is the first to demonstrate the presence of donor-derived DNA in the urine of HSCT recipients; however, we show that much of this DNA originates from donor-derived cells, rather than from the transrenal passage of cell-free plasma DNA. Our discovery of donor-derived cytokeratin-producing epithelial cells raises interesting biological and therapeutic implications, e.g., the capacity of marrow stem cells to serve as an extrarenal source for renal tubule regeneration.
Authors: Sarah M Dermody; Chandan Bhambhani; Paul L Swiecicki; J Chad Brenner; Muneesh Tewari Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Renata Jacewicz; Krzysztof Lewandowski; Joanna Rupa-Matysek; Maciej Jedrzejczyk; Mieczysław Komarnicki; Jarosław Berent Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Tuula K Outinen; Taru Kuparinen; Juulia Jylhävä; Sonja Leppänen; Jukka Mustonen; Satu Mäkelä; Ilkka Pörsti; Jaana Syrjänen; Antti Vaheri; Mikko Hurme Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jieun Kim; Dong-Moung Kim; Yu Jin Park; Seung-Tae Lee; Hyon-Suk Kim; Myoung Soo Kim; Beom Seok Kim; Jong Rak Choi Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Tingting Xie; Guangya Wang; Spencer C Ding; Wing-Shan Lee; Suk Hang Cheng; Rebecca W Y Chan; Ze Zhou; Mary-Jane L Ma; Diana S C Han; Jeremy Y C Teoh; W K Jacky Lam; Peiyong Jiang; Rossa W K Chiu; K C Allen Chan; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: NPJ Genom Med Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 8.617
Authors: Nancy B Y Tsui; Peiyong Jiang; Katherine C K Chow; Xiaoxi Su; Tak Y Leung; Hao Sun; K C Allen Chan; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 3.240