Literature DB >> 18974067

A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems.

Steven Budd1, John Daskalogiannakis, Bryan D Tompson.   

Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to assess and compare the in vitro tribological behaviour of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems. The frictional characteristics of the Damon3, Speed, In-Ovation R, and Time2 bracket systems were studied using a jig that mimics the three-dimensional movements that occur during sliding mechanics. Each bracket system was tested on the following stainless steel archwires: 0.016 x 0.022, 0.019 x 0.025, 0.020 round, and 0.021 x 0.021 inch Speed D-wire. An Instron testing machine with a 50 N load cell was used to measure the frictional resistance for each bracket/tooth assembly. The crosshead speed was set at a constant rate of 1 mm/minute, and each typodont tooth was moved along a fixed wire segment for a distance of 8 mm. Descriptive statistical analysis for each bracket/archwire combination with regard to frictional resistance was performed with a two-way, balanced analysis of variance for bracket type and wire size. The Damon3 bracket consistently demonstrated the lowest frictional resistance to sliding, while the Speed bracket produced significantly (P < 0.001) more frictional resistance than the other brackets tested for any given archwire. The self-ligation design (passive versus active) appears to be the primary variable responsible for the frictional resistance generated by self-ligating brackets during translation. Passively ligated brackets produce less frictional resistance; however, this decreased friction may result in decreased control compared with actively ligated systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18974067     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

2.  Archwire depth is a significant parameter in the frictional resistance of active and interactive, but not passive, self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Christa L Oliver; John Daskalogiannakis; Bryan D Tompson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Raquel Morais Castro; Perrin Smith Neto; Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta; Matheus Melo Pithon; Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Effect of passive self-ligating bracket placement on the posterior teeth on reduction of frictional force in sliding mechanics.

Authors:  Kyu-Ry Kim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Evaluation of force released by deflection of orthodontic wires in conventional and self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Rodrigo Hitoshi Higa; Nayara Thiago Semenara; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Guilherme Janson; Renata Sathler; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

6.  Force level of small diameter nickel-titanium orthodontic wires ligated with different methods.

Authors:  Rodrigo Hitoshi Higa; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Guilherme Janson; Murilo Matias; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Fernanda Pinelli Henriques; Manoela Fávaro Francisconi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Evaluation of the force generated by gradual deflection of 0.016-inch NiTi and stainless steel orthodontic wires in self-ligating metallic and esthetic brackets.

Authors:  Manoela-Fávaro Francisconi; Guilherme Janson; José-Fernando-Castanha Henriques; Karina-Maria-Salvatore Freitas; Paulo-Afonso-Silveira Francisconi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-05-01

8.  Role of lubricants on friction between self-ligating brackets and archwires.

Authors:  Renata C Leal; Flávia L B Amaral; Fabiana M G França; Roberta T Basting; Cecilia P Turssi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions.

Authors:  Sérgio Ricardo Jakob; Davison Matheus; Maria Cristina Jimenez-Pellegrin; Cecília Pedroso Turssi; Flávia Lucisano Botelho Amaral
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

Review 10.  Resistance to sliding in orthodontics: misconception or method error? A systematic review and a proposal of a test protocol.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Aggeliki Papoutsi; Simona Dianiskova; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.