Literature DB >> 18973798

Exploring the evolutionary rate differences of party hub and date hub proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein-protein interaction network.

Bratati Kahali1, Shandar Ahmad, Tapash Chandra Ghosh.   

Abstract

Evolutionary rates of party hub and date hub proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are analyzed under the perspective of ordered/disordered ness of proteins and the three dimensional structural context such as the solvent accessibility of the amino acid residues. Our results suggest that the lowering of evolutionary rate of the party hub proteins than the date hub proteins is solely contributed by the ordered regions of the corresponding proteins. Moreover the slower evolutionary rate of the party hub proteins than the date hub counterparts can be attributed to the presence of buried amino acid residues. Thus, our work endeavors further into the understanding of the evolutionary rate differences of the two different types of hub proteins of S. cerevisiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18973798     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interactome networks and human disease.

Authors:  Marc Vidal; Michael E Cusick; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Exploring the binding diversity of intrinsically disordered proteins involved in one-to-many binding.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Hsu; Christopher J Oldfield; Bin Xue; Jingwei Meng; Fei Huang; Pedro Romero; Vladimir N Uversky; A Keith Dunker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Novel insights through the integration of structural and functional genomics data with protein networks.

Authors:  Declan Clarke; Nitin Bhardwaj; Mark B Gerstein
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  Understanding the effect of secondary structures and aggregation on human protein folding class evolution.

Authors:  Tina Begum; Tapash Chandra Ghosh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Predicting the binding patterns of hub proteins: a study using yeast protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Carson M Andorf; Vasant Honavar; Taner Z Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Protein complex forming ability is favored over the features of interacting partners in determining the evolutionary rates of proteins in the yeast protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Sandip Chakraborty; Bratati Kahali; Tapash C Ghosh
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-11-12

7.  A comparative study of Whi5 and retinoblastoma proteins: from sequence and structure analysis to intracellular networks.

Authors:  Md Mehedi Hasan; Stefania Brocca; Elena Sacco; Michela Spinelli; Elena Papaleo; Matteo Lambrughi; Lilia Alberghina; Marco Vanoni
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Speciation and the developmental alarm clock.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Joanna D Bundus
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Virtual interactomics of proteins from biochemical standpoint.

Authors:  Jaroslav Kubrycht; Karel Sigler; Pavel Souček
Journal:  Mol Biol Int       Date:  2012-08-08

Review 10.  Experimental evolution of protein-protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Betül Kaçar; Eric A Gaucher
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.