Literature DB >> 18971956

Genetic and morphological patterns show variation in frequency of hybrids between Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) zones of sympatry.

G Aldridge1, D R Campbell.   

Abstract

Variation in rates of hybridization among zones of sympatry between a pair of species provides a useful window into the effect of local conditions on the evolution of reproductive isolation. We employed floral morphological traits and neutral genetic markers to quantify the frequency of individuals intermediate to the two parental species in two zones of sympatry between Ipomopsis aggregata and I. tenuituba, using clustering methods that make no a priori assumptions about population structure. The sites differed not only in the frequency of intermediate individuals, but also in climate, pollinator abundance and behavior and spatial structure of plant populations. Both floral traits, which are likely to be under natural selection and molecular markers, which are quasi-neutral, indicated more population structure at one site than the other, the pattern being more pronounced for floral morphology. One likely explanation for this difference between sites is that local ecological conditions, particularly pollinator choice of flowers, have promoted different rates of hybridization between these species. Hence, the evolution of reproductive isolation might depend in part on local conditions, and thus differ among populations of the same pair of species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18971956     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  12 in total

1.  Early snowmelt projected to cause population decline in a subalpine plant.

Authors:  Diane R Campbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Clines in traits compared over two decades in a plant hybrid zone.

Authors:  Diane R Campbell; Alexandra Faidiga; Gabriel Trujillo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Phenotypic plasticity of floral volatiles in response to increasing drought stress.

Authors:  Diane R Campbell; Paula Sosenski; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Floral scent in natural hybrids of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) and their parental species.

Authors:  Mascha Bischoff; Andreas Jürgens; Diane R Campbell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Highly variable reproductive isolation among pairs of Catostomus species.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Mandeville; Thomas L Parchman; David B McDonald; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Exploring species limits in two closely related Chinese oaks.

Authors:  Yan-Fei Zeng; Wan-Jin Liao; Rémy J Petit; Da-Yong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Variation in the frequency and extent of hybridization between Leucosceptrum japonicum and L. stellipilum (Lamiaceae) in the Central Japanese Mainland.

Authors:  Yue Li; Masayuki Maki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A comparison of reproductive isolation between two closely related oak species in zones of recent and ancient secondary contact.

Authors:  Wan-Jin Liao; Bi-Ru Zhu; Yue-Fei Li; Xiao-Meng Li; Yan-Fei Zeng; Da-Yong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  The Influence of Prior Learning Experience on Pollinator Choice: An Experiment Using Bumblebees on Two Wild Floral Types of Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  Coline C Jaworski; Christophe Andalo; Christine Raynaud; Valérie Simon; Christophe Thébaud; Jérôme Chave
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  What, if anything, are hybrids: enduring truths and challenges associated with population structure and gene flow.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.