Literature DB >> 18971771

Sitting pressure in the tilted position: manual tilt-in-space wheelchair vs. manual wheelchair with a new rear antitip device.

Blair MacDonald1, R Lee Kirby, Cher Smith, Donald A MacLeod, Adam Webber.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that, in comparison with a heavier, larger and more expensive manual tilt-in-space wheelchair, a lightweight manual wheelchair equipped with new rear antitip devices provides comparable mean sitting pressures in the tilted position, each of eight able-bodied participants sat for 8 mins in each wheelchair, upright, and tilted back (38-39 degrees). The mean (+/-SD) sitting pressures (of all active sensors in a force-sensing array) at the eighth minute in the upright and tilted positions with the new rear antitip device wheelchair were 58.6 (+/-14.0) and 45.8 (+/-9.3) mm Hg (a 20.7% reduction) (P = 0.005). For the tilt-in-space wheelchair, the mean values were 55.7 (+/-13.9) and 47.2 (+/-10.8) mm Hg (a 26.3% reduction) (P = 0.008). There were no significant differences between the wheelchairs in the upright (P = 0.843) or tilted (P = 0.624) positions. A lightweight manual wheelchair equipped with a new rear antitip device provides equivalent reductions of sitting pressures in the tilted position to a comparably tilted tilt-in-space wheelchair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18971771     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818dff2a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  1 in total

1.  Sliding and pressure evaluation on conventional and V-shaped seats of reclining wheelchairs for stroke patients with flaccid hemiplegia: a crossover trial.

Authors:  Hsiu-Chen Huang; Cheng-Hsin Yeh; Chi-Myn Chen; Yu-Sheng Lin; Kao-Chi Chung
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 4.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.