Literature DB >> 18971736

Roman arch, keystone fixation for facial bipartition with monobloc distraction.

James P Bradley1, Alex Levitt, Joanna Nguyen, Cassio E Raposo, Reza Jarrahy, Hurig V Katchikian, Henry K Kawamoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with craniofacial dysostosis may require correction for hypertelorbitism and midface hypoplasia. Traditionally, these procedures were sequential or staged, and used acute advancement with bone grafting and rigid fixation. The authors reviewed a series of combined, one-stage facial bipartition and monobloc distraction procedures using internal devices. They describe the Roman arch, keystone fixation modification to maximize the stability of the bipartition segments and support the vertical load of the distraction forces.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed at the University of California, Los Angeles as having craniofacial dysostosis with hypertelorbitism and midface hypoplasia who underwent the Roman arch, keystone fixation procedure were included in the study (n = 13). Reduction of interdacryon and intercanthal distances and the lateral cephalometric horizontal change of the forehead, midface, and maxilla were studied postoperatively and at 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: There were no serious complications (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, frontal bone loss); there was a 10 percent rate of total complications (wound infection). Facial bipartition successfully narrowed the interdacryon distance by a mean of 55 percent (21 mm), with only a 3-mm relapse. The mean distraction advancement/relapse was as follows: forehead, +16 mm/-2 mm; midface, 14 mm/-1 mm; and maxilla, 13 mm/-1 mm. Only one of 13 patients required a repeated monobloc procedure. Of the seven patients who reached skeletal maturity, 86 percent underwent a subsequent Le Fort I and/or III procedure.
CONCLUSION: The Roman arch, keystone fixation modification of a combined facial bipartition with monobloc distraction using internal devices provided a stable construct for advancement, with minimal relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18971736     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181881f92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  3 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Midface Morphology and Growth in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Patients Following Frontofacial Monobloc Distraction.

Authors:  Cristiano Tonello; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Antonio C O Ruellas; Nivaldo Alonso
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Advances in the Treatment of Syndromic Midface Hypoplasia Using Monobloc and Facial Bipartition Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Anand R Kumar; Derek Steinbacher
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.