Literature DB >> 18971731

Evaluation of single-, double-, and triple-nerve transfers for shoulder abduction in 90 patients with supraclavicular brachial plexus injury.

Alexander Cardenas-Mejia1, Ciaran P O'Boyle, Kuang-Te Chen, David Chwei-Chin Chuang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shoulder stability and mobility are critical to upper extremity function. The authors evaluated and compared the results of single-, double-, and triple-nerve transfer techniques in producing shoulder abduction in supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries.
METHODS: Between January of 2000 and December of 2004, 90 patients with avulsion type brachial plexus injuries were selected for this study. All patients were operated on by the senior surgeon (D.C.C.C.). The brachial plexus injuries involved avulsion of five or six (including C4) roots in 41 patients (45.6 percent), four-root avulsion in five patients (5.6 percent), three-root avulsion in 25 patients (27.8 percent), two-root avulsion in 15 patients (16.7 percent), and one-root avulsion in four patients (4.4 percent). Ages ranged from 2 to 67 years, with a mean age of 29 years. All patients had nerve transfer for shoulder abduction: 43 (47.8 percent) received a single-nerve transfer, 43 (47.8 percent) received a double-nerve transfer, and four patients (4.4 percent) had a triple-nerve transfer for shoulder function. All patients had a minimum of 3 years' follow-up. Each patient's ability to abduct the shoulder was measured in degrees, and the measurements were compared statistically by nonparametric means.
RESULTS: The average degree of shoulder abduction attained was 160 degrees following triple-nerve transfers, 85 degrees following double-nerve transfers, and 65 degrees following single-nerve transfer. The shoulder abduction achieved following either double-nerve transfer or triple-nerve transfer was significantly greater than that achieved by single-nerve transfer.
CONCLUSION: Increasing the number of donor nerves used in early-stage nerve transfers to neurotize the avulsed brachial plexus appears to improve subsequent shoulder abduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18971731     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181881fc5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Brachial plexus injury: nerve reconstruction and functioning muscle transplantation.

Authors:  David Chwei-Chin Chuang
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Possible donor nerves for axillary nerve reconstruction in dual neurotization for restoring shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michal Makeľ; Andrej Sukop; David Kachlík; Petr Waldauf; Adam Whitley; Radek Kaiser
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Nerve reconstruction: A cohort study of 93 cases of global brachial plexus palsy.

Authors:  Anil Bhatia; Ashok K Shyam; Piyush Doshi; Vitrag Shah
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Evaluation of nerve transfer options for treating total brachial plexus avulsion injury: A retrospective study of 73 participants.

Authors:  Kai-Ming Gao; Jing-Jing Hu; Jie Lao; Xin Zhao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.135

5.  Treatment of Brachial Plexus Injury Following Transaxillary Thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Hosseinali Abdolrazaghi; Javad Rahmati; Changiz Delavari; Hojjat Molaei
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.