Literature DB >> 18971583

Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.

Christopher S Ennen1, James A Bofill, Everett F Magann, John D Bass, Suneet P Chauhan, John C Morrison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To identify risk factors for cesarean delivery in patients with an unfavorable cervix undergoing an indicated induction of labor.
METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of combined data from three prospective randomized trials comparing cervical ripening methods in singleton pregnancies with an unfavorable cervix seeking to identify risk factors for cesarean delivery.
RESULTS: Nine hundred and five women underwent an induction of labor for a variety of indications. Gestational age ranged from 27.0-42.8 weeks (mean of 37.8 weeks) and initial Bishop's score from 0-6 (mean 2.5). There were 613 vaginal deliveries (67.7%) and 292 cesarean deliveries (32.2%). Factors associated with an increased risk for cesarean delivery included nulliparous status, Bishop's score <or=1, body mass index >40 and diabetes mellitus.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for cesarean delivery in women undergoing an indicated induction include a low Bishop's score, high BMI, nulliparity and diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18971583     DOI: 10.1159/000166307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  6 in total

1.  Why do multiparous women with a history of vaginal delivery give birth by cesarean section?

Authors:  Hale Göksever Çelik; Ayşegül Bestel; Engin Çelik; Alev Atış Aydın
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Elizabeth W Triche; David D Dore; Janet H Muri; Maureen G Phipps; David A Savitz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tove Wallstrom; Hans Jarnbert-Pettersson; David Stenson; Helena Akerud; Elisabeth Darj; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Eva Wiberg-Itzel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Delivery route following elective induction of labor at term: analysis of 807 patients.

Authors:  Meghan I Rattigan; Andrew L Atkinson; Jonathan D Baum
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-06-21

5.  Outcome of Induction and Associated Factors among Term and Post-Term Mothers Managed at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: A Two Years' Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Woubishet Girma; Fitsum Tseadu; Mirkuzie Wolde
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2016-03

6.  Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.

Authors:  Daniele Bolla; Saskia Vanessa Weissleder; Anda-Petronela Radan; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Luigi Raio; Martin Müller; Daniel Surbek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.