Literature DB >> 18971057

An electromyographic assessment of the "bear hug": an examination for the evaluation of the subscapularis muscle.

Simon Chao1, Stephen Thomas, David Yucha, John D Kelly, Jeff Driban, Kathleen Swanik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The lift-off and belly-press tests are common tests for evaluation of the subscapularis. We compared these tests with the recently developed bear-hug test by assessing electromyographic (EMG) activity of the shoulder internal rotators during examination.
METHODS: Twenty-one healthy male volunteers (mean age, 22.95 +/- 3.71 years; mean weight, 73.48 +/- 6.93 kg; mean height, 68.76 +/- 2.26 cm) with no previous history of shoulder surgery or injury participated in the study. Fine-wire and surface EMG activity of the glenohumeral joint internal rotators (i.e., upper and lower subscapularis, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi) was recorded while 5 subscapularis tests were being performed (bear hug at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees; lift off; and belly press). Peak EMG values were normalized to the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) for each muscle. A 4 (muscle) x 5 (test) analysis of variance with repeated measures on test was used to analyze peak EMG activity (percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction). Follow-up univariate analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc analyses were performed for each of the 5 tests.
RESULTS: The bear-hug test performed at 45 degrees of shoulder flexion showed significantly greater peak EMG activity in the upper subscapularis (107.64% +/- 63.52%) and lower subscapularis (85.75% +/- 64.69%) compared with the pectoralis major (41.43% +/- 25.42%) and latissimus dorsi (20.32% +/- 15.70%) (P < .05). The bear-hug test performed at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion showed significantly greater peak EMG activity in the lower subscapularis (166.0% +/- 132.71%) compared with the upper subscapularis (97.23% +/- 70.78%), pectoralis major (50.63% +/- 29.60%), and latissimus dorsi (17.56% +/- 13.64%) (P < .05). The belly-press test showed significantly greater peak EMG activity in the upper subscapularis (77.88% +/- 53.23%) and lower subscapularis (71.82% +/- 46.49%) compared with the pectoralis major (18.49% +/- 14.85%) and latissimus dorsi (34.85% +/- 27.73%) (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The bear-hug examination performed at 45 degrees of shoulder flexion and the belly-press test may be valuable diagnostic tools in the clinical evaluation of the upper subscapularis muscle. In addition, the bear-hug test at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion may be a valuable diagnostic tool in assessing the clinical function of the lower subscapularis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The bear-hug examination performed at specific degrees of shoulder flexion may be a valuable way to assess the function of the subscapularis muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18971057     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  9 in total

1.  Subscapularis tendon integrity: an examination of shoulder index tests.

Authors:  Ruel Rigsby; Michael Sitler; John D Kelly
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  [Clinical evaluation of the shoulder].

Authors:  M Brkic; D Froemel; A Meurer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Tests for diagnosing subacromial impingement syndrome and rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  Nick Phillips
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-06-17

4.  Diagnostic performance of clinical tests for subscapularis tendon tears.

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Mirco Sgroi; Heiko Reichel; Manuel Daexle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The upper band of the subscapularis tendon in the rat has altered mechanical and histologic properties.

Authors:  Stephen J Thomas; Kristin S Miller; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  [Anatomy and diagnostics of subscapularis tendon lesions].

Authors:  David Endell; Christopher Child; Florian Freislederer; Philipp Moroder; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-11

7.  Repair versus shaving of partial-thickness articular-sided tears of the upper subscapularis tendon. A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Paolo Arrigoni; Alberto Aliprandi; Silvana Sdao; Vincenza Ragone; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Filippo Randelli; Paolo Cabitza; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-28

8.  A Correlation Study of Clinical Outcomes by Quantification of Fatty Degeneration of the Subscapularis: Partial vs. Whole Cross-section.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Park; Kwang Yeol Lee; Sung Min Rhee; Joo Han Oh
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2018-06-01

9.  Clinical Outcomes for Isolated Subscapularis Tears With Advanced Fatty Infiltration: Nonoperative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic Single-Row Repair.

Authors:  Tae-Hwan Yoon; Sung-Jae Kim; Yun-Rak Choi; Ho-Sung Keum; Yong-Min Chun
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.