Literature DB >> 18963377

Separation of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) in ground waters by ion-exchange.

W H Ficklin1.   

Abstract

The predominant species of arsenic in ground water are probably arsenite and arsenate. These can be separated with a strong anion-exchange resin (Dowex 1 x 8; 100-200 mesh, acetate form) in a 10 cm x 7 mm column. Samples are filtered and acidified with concentrated hydrochloric acid (1 ml per 100 ml of sample) at the sample site. Five ml of the acidified sample are used for the separation. At this acidity, As(III) passes through the acetate-form resin, and As(V) is retained. As(V) is eluted by passage of 0.12M hydrochloric acid through the column (resulting in conversion of the resin back into the chloride form). Samples are collected in 5-ml portions up to a total of 20 ml. The arsenic concentration in each portion is determined by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrophotometry. The first two fractions give the As(III) concentration and the last two the As(V) concentration. The detection limit for the concentration of each species is 1 mug l .

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 18963377     DOI: 10.1016/0039-9140(83)80084-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  9 in total

1.  Influence of organic matters on AsIII oxidation by the microflora of polluted soils.

Authors:  T Lescure; J Moreau; C Charles; T Ben Ali Saanda; H Thouin; N Pillas; P Bauda; I Lamy; F Battaglia-Brunet
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Field Deployable Method for Arsenic Speciation in Water.

Authors:  Thomas C Voice; Lisveth V Flores Del Pino; Ivan Havezov; David T Long
Journal:  Phys Chem Earth (2002)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Arsenic removal by nanoparticles: a review.

Authors:  Mirna Habuda-Stanić; Marija Nujić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Field based speciation of arsenic in UK and Argentinean water samples.

Authors:  M J Watts; J O'Reilly; A L Marcilla; R A Shaw; N I Ward
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Arsenite oxidation by a facultative chemolithotrophic bacterium SDB1 isolated from mine tailing.

Authors:  Rovimar T Lugtu; Sung-Chan Choi; Young-Sook Oh
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Sulfur geochemistry of hydrothermal waters in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA. III. An anion-exchange resin technique for sampling and preservation of sulfoxyanions in natural waters.

Authors:  Greg K Druschel; Martin Aa Schoonen; D Kirk Nordstrom; James W Ball; Yong Xu; Corey A Cohn
Journal:  Geochem Trans       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.737

7.  Titanium dioxide solid phase for inorganic species adsorption and determination: the case of arsenic.

Authors:  R Vera; C Fontàs; E Anticó
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Highly efficient arsenic removal using a composite of ultrafine magnetite nanoparticles interlinked by silane coupling agents.

Authors:  Shu-Chi Chang; Yu-Han Yu; Cheng-Hao Li; Chin-Ching Wu; Hao-Yun Lei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The impact of artisanal gold mining, ore processing and mineralization on water quality in Marmato, Colombia.

Authors:  Keith W Torrance; Stewart D Redwood; Alessandro Cecchi
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 4.609

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.