Literature DB >> 18959705

Newborn circumcision in Victoria, Australia: reasons and parental attitudes.

Bo Xu1, Hershel Goldman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to study the reasons why some parents continue to seek professional circumcision service for their newborn boys in Victoria, Australia, their attitudes towards newborn circumcision and their personal characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-six parents (62 fathers and 74 mothers) who presented to the Melbourne Circumcision Centre between July and December 2007 were recruited. They represented the parents of 85 newborn boys. A questionnaire designed by the authors was completed by the parents before circumcision. The responses were tabulated and analysed.
RESULTS: The most common reasons for newborn circumcision were hygiene (77.9%), family tradition (57.4%) and medical reasons (36%). The most common perceived benefit was hygiene (95.6%). The most common concern was pain (79.4%). As the number of boys a mother had who were already circumcised increased, the age at circumcision of the newborn boy became earlier (P = 0.024). 41.2% of parents wished for further information to help them better make the decision before or at the time of childbirth in the hospital setting. 76.5% of parents would, 19.1% of parents were unsure and 4.4% would not recommend newborn circumcision by an experienced practitioner to other parents.
CONCLUSION: Some parents continue to circumcise their newborn boys for hygiene, family tradition and medical reasons in Victoria, Australia. Information about the pros and cons of newborn circumcision needs to be made more readily available to empower parents to make free, informed decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18959705     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04723.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  6 in total

1.  Parents' rationale for male circumcision.

Authors:  Chris Rediger; Andries J Muller
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Attitudes and decision making about neonatal male circumcision in a Hispanic population in New York City.

Authors:  Gabriela M Bisono; Lisa Simmons; Robert J Volk; Dodi Meyer; Thomas C Quinn; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 1.168

Review 3.  A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  Recommendation by a law body to ban infant male circumcision has serious worldwide implications for pediatric practice and human rights.

Authors:  Michael J Bates; John B Ziegler; Sean E Kennedy; Adrian Mindel; Alex D Wodak; Laurie S Zoloth; Aaron A R Tobian; Brian J Morris
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Parental circumcision preferences and early outcome of plastibell circumcision in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Okechukwu Hyginus Ekwunife; Jideofor Okechukwu Ugwu; Chinedu C Okoli; Victor Ifeanyichukwu Modekwe; Andrew N Osuigwe
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Athos Katelaris; Norman J Blumenthal; Mohamed Hajoona; Adrian C Sheen; Leslie Schrieber; Eugenie R Lumbers; Alex D Wodak; Phillip Katelaris
Journal:  J Mens Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 0.789

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.