Bo Xu1, Hershel Goldman. 1. St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia. greatbear227@hotmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to study the reasons why some parents continue to seek professional circumcision service for their newborn boys in Victoria, Australia, their attitudes towards newborn circumcision and their personal characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-six parents (62 fathers and 74 mothers) who presented to the Melbourne Circumcision Centre between July and December 2007 were recruited. They represented the parents of 85 newborn boys. A questionnaire designed by the authors was completed by the parents before circumcision. The responses were tabulated and analysed. RESULTS: The most common reasons for newborn circumcision were hygiene (77.9%), family tradition (57.4%) and medical reasons (36%). The most common perceived benefit was hygiene (95.6%). The most common concern was pain (79.4%). As the number of boys a mother had who were already circumcised increased, the age at circumcision of the newborn boy became earlier (P = 0.024). 41.2% of parents wished for further information to help them better make the decision before or at the time of childbirth in the hospital setting. 76.5% of parents would, 19.1% of parents were unsure and 4.4% would not recommend newborn circumcision by an experienced practitioner to other parents. CONCLUSION: Some parents continue to circumcise their newborn boys for hygiene, family tradition and medical reasons in Victoria, Australia. Information about the pros and cons of newborn circumcision needs to be made more readily available to empower parents to make free, informed decisions.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to study the reasons why some parents continue to seek professional circumcision service for their newborn boys in Victoria, Australia, their attitudes towards newborn circumcision and their personal characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-six parents (62 fathers and 74 mothers) who presented to the Melbourne Circumcision Centre between July and December 2007 were recruited. They represented the parents of 85 newborn boys. A questionnaire designed by the authors was completed by the parents before circumcision. The responses were tabulated and analysed. RESULTS: The most common reasons for newborn circumcision were hygiene (77.9%), family tradition (57.4%) and medical reasons (36%). The most common perceived benefit was hygiene (95.6%). The most common concern was pain (79.4%). As the number of boys a mother had who were already circumcised increased, the age at circumcision of the newborn boy became earlier (P = 0.024). 41.2% of parents wished for further information to help them better make the decision before or at the time of childbirth in the hospital setting. 76.5% of parents would, 19.1% of parents were unsure and 4.4% would not recommend newborn circumcision by an experienced practitioner to other parents. CONCLUSION: Some parents continue to circumcise their newborn boys for hygiene, family tradition and medical reasons in Victoria, Australia. Information about the pros and cons of newborn circumcision needs to be made more readily available to empower parents to make free, informed decisions.
Authors: Gabriela M Bisono; Lisa Simmons; Robert J Volk; Dodi Meyer; Thomas C Quinn; Susan L Rosenthal Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Michael J Bates; John B Ziegler; Sean E Kennedy; Adrian Mindel; Alex D Wodak; Laurie S Zoloth; Aaron A R Tobian; Brian J Morris Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2013-09-08 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Brian J Morris; Athos Katelaris; Norman J Blumenthal; Mohamed Hajoona; Adrian C Sheen; Leslie Schrieber; Eugenie R Lumbers; Alex D Wodak; Phillip Katelaris Journal: J Mens Health Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 0.789