Literature DB >> 18959572

Barriers to bicycle helmet use among Dutch paediatricians.

E Villamor1, S Hammer, A Martinez-Olaizola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, bicycle helmet wearing rates are very low and perceived social barriers to helmet use are important. We aimed to determine why Dutch paediatricians do or do not wear helmets while bicycling and whether their personal behaviour is influencing their position about the promotion of helmet use.
METHODS: Attendants to the annual meeting of the Dutch Paediatric Society (7-9 November 2006) were surveyed about bicycle riding frequency, helmet use, reasons for not wearing a helmet, helmet use among their own children and personal position about the promotion and legislation of bicycle helmet use.
RESULTS: Of the 1110 paediatricians who are active in the Netherlands, 258 answered the survey. Ninety-six per cent of the respondents ride a bicycle (68% more than once a week). Bicycle was used as a mean of transport (32%), as a recreation/sport (11%) or with both purposes (57%). When cycling for transportation, 94% never wear a helmet and 2% always wear it. When cycling for recreation, 70% never wear a helmet and 18% always wear it. The most common reasons given for not wearing a helmet were: 'I never thought about that' (43%), 'Poor appearance' (31%), 'Nobody uses it in the Netherlands' (27%) and 'Uncomfortable' (25%). A majority (91%) of the respondents agreed that bicycle helmets are effective in reducing the rate of head injury to bicyclists and that they should be advised to children (82%) and adolescents (54%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that among Dutch paediatricians, cycling rate is high and helmet wearing rate is very low and that they experience numerous personal barriers to bicycle helmet use. This might explain why bicycle helmet promotion campaigns are scarcely supported by Dutch paediatricians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18959572     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00882.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Care Health Dev        ISSN: 0305-1862            Impact factor:   2.508


  6 in total

1.  Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: a case-crossover study.

Authors:  Kay Teschke; M Anne Harris; Conor C O Reynolds; Meghan Winters; Shelina Babul; Mary Chipman; Michael D Cusimano; Jeff R Brubacher; Garth Hunte; Steven M Friedman; Melody Monro; Hui Shen; Lee Vernich; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Investigating helmet promotion for cyclists: results from a randomised study with observation of behaviour, using a semi-automatic video system.

Authors:  Aymery Constant; Antoine Messiah; Marie-Line Felonneau; Emmanuel Lagarde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Helmet Use Amongst Equestrians: Harnessing Social and Attitudinal Factors Revealed in Online Forums.

Authors:  Laura Haigh; Kirrilly Thompson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  The role of bicycle sharing systems in normalising the image of cycling: An observational study of London cyclists.

Authors:  Anna Goodman; Judith Green; James Woodcock
Journal:  J Transp Health       Date:  2014-03

5.  Personal and trip characteristics associated with safety equipment use by injured adult bicyclists: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kay Teschke; Jeff R Brubacher; Steven M Friedman; Peter A Cripton; M Anne Harris; Conor C O Reynolds; Hui Shen; Melody Monro; Garth Hunte; Mary Chipman; Michael D Cusimano; Nancy Smith Lea; Shelina Babul; Meghan Winters
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Factors Affecting Ankle Support Device Usage in Young Basketball Players.

Authors:  Michael D Cusimano; Ahmed Faress; Wilson P Luong; Khizer Amin; Joanne Eid; Tamer Abdelshaheed; Kelly Russell
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.