Literature DB >> 18959316

Coexistence of intraguild predators and prey in resource-rich environments.

Priyanga Amarasekare1.   

Abstract

The prevalence of intraguild predation (IGP) in productive environments has long puzzled ecologists. Theory predicts the exclusion of intraguild prey from such environments, but data consistently defy this expectation. This suggests that coexistence mechanisms at high resource productivity may differ from those at lower productivity. Here I present a mathematical model that investigates multiple coexistence mechanisms. I incorporate two biological features widely observed in IGP communities: intraspecific interference via cannibalism or superparasitism, and temporal refuges arising from differential sensitivities to abiotic variation. I develop predictions based on three aspects of the IG prey-IG predator interaction: mutual invasibility, transient dynamics, and long-term abundances. These predictions specify the conditions under which coexistence mechanisms reinforce vs. deter one another: when a competition-IGP trade-off allows coexistence at intermediate productivity a temporal refuge for the intraguild prey always allows coexistence at high productivity, but intraspecific interference does so only at a net fitness cost to the intraguild predator. Intraspecific interference that benefits the intraguild predator not only reduces tradeoff-mediated coexistence at intermediate productivity, but also undermines the refuge's coexistence-enhancing effect at high productivity. Different mechanism combinations yield characteristic signatures in time series data during transient dynamics. By judicious measurement of parameters and examining time series for critical signatures, one can elucidate the mechanisms that allow IGP to prevail in resource-rich environments.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18959316     DOI: 10.1890/07-1508.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  11 in total

1.  Eating the competition speeds up invasions.

Authors:  Richard J Hall
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Trophic omnivory across a productivity gradient: intraguild predation theory and the structure and strength of species interactions.

Authors:  Mark Novak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Avoidance of intraguild predation leads to a long-term positive trait-mediated indirect effect in an insect community.

Authors:  Enric Frago; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Dynamics of a intraguild predation model with generalist or specialist predator.

Authors:  Yun Kang; Lauren Wedekin
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient.

Authors:  K Ullas Karanth; Arjun Srivathsa; Divya Vasudev; Mahi Puri; Ravishankar Parameshwaran; N Samba Kumar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Adaptive and variable intraguild predators facilitate local coexistence in an intraguild predation module.

Authors:  San-He Wu; Toshinori Okuyama
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.964

7.  Threat-sensitive anti-intraguild predation behaviour: maternal strategies to reduce offspring predation risk in mites.

Authors:  Andreas Walzer; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Intraguild Predation Dynamics in a Lake Ecosystem Based on a Coupled Hydrodynamic-Ecological Model: The Example of Lake Kinneret (Israel).

Authors:  Vardit Makler-Pick; Matthew R Hipsey; Tamar Zohary; Yohay Carmel; Gideon Gal
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-29

9.  Living on a trophic subsidy: Algal quality drives an upper-shore herbivore's consumption, preference and absorption but not growth rates.

Authors:  Diego Quintanilla-Ahumada; Pedro A Quijón; Jorge M Navarro; José Pulgar; Cristian Duarte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Phenotypic plasticity in anti-intraguild predator strategies: mite larvae adjust their behaviours according to vulnerability and predation risk.

Authors:  Andreas Walzer; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 2.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.