Literature DB >> 18958306

A new mutation in BFSP2 (G1091A) causes autosomal dominant congenital lamellar cataracts.

Xu Ma1, Fei-Feng Li, Shu-Zhen Wang, Chang Gao, Meng Zhang, Si-Quan Zhu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to identify the genetic defect in a four-generation Chinese family with autosomal dominant congenital lamellar cataracts and demonstrate the functional analysis with biosoftware of a candidate gene in the family.
METHODS: Family history data were recorded. Clinical and ophthalmologic examinations were performed on family members. All the members were genotyped with microsatellite markers at loci considered to be associated with cataracts. Two-point LOD scores were calculated by using the Linkage Software after genotyping. A mutation was detected by using gene-specific primers in direct sequencing. Wild type and mutant proteins were analyzed with Online Bio-Software.
RESULTS: Affected members of this family had lamellar cataracts. Linkage analysis was obtained at markers D3S2322 (LOD score [Z]=7.22, recombination fraction [theta]=0.0) and D3S1541 (Z=5.42, theta=0.0). Haplotype analysis indicated that the cataract gene was closely linked to these two markers. Sequencing the beaded filament structural protein 2 (BFSP2) gene revealed a G>A transversion in exon 5, which caused a conservative substitution of Arg to His at codon 339 (P.R339H). This mutation cosegregated with the disease phenotype in all affected individuals and was not observed in the unaffected family members or in 100 normal, unrelated individuals. Bioinformatic analyses showed that a highly conserved region was located around Arg339. Data generated with Online Bio-Software revealed that the mutation altered the protein's hydrophobicity, hydrophobic moment, and chaperone and regulation activities.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported case of a congenital lamellar cataract phenotype associated with the mutation of Arg339His (P.R339H) in BFSP2. It highlights the physiologic importance of the beaded filament protein and demonstrates a possible mechanism of action for the mutant gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18958306      PMCID: PMC2573734     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Vis        ISSN: 1090-0535            Impact factor:   2.367


Introduction

Hereditary congenital cataract is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous lens disease responsible for a significant proportion of visual impairment and blindness in childhood [1,2]. It can occur in an isolated fashion or as one component of a multi-system disorder. Non-syndromic congenital cataracts have an estimated incidence of 1–6 per 10,000 live births [3-6], and at least one-third of the cases are familial. From the first description of the cosegregation of inherited cataracts with the Duffy blood group locus [7], more than 30 loci have been mapped through linkage analysis and 19 genes have been characterized. Among the 19 genes, 10 genes encode crystallins (CRYAA, CRYAB, CRYBA1/A3, CRYBA, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, CRYBB3, CRYGC, CRYGD, CRYGS), three encode membrane transport proteins (MIP, GJA3, GJA8), two encode a cytoskeletal protein (BFSP1, BSFP2), three encode transcription factors (HSF4, MAF, PITX3), and one encodes a lens intrinsic membrane protein (Lim2) [8-12]. Lens-specific beaded filament structural protein–2 (BFSP2, also called phakinin, CP47, CP49, and LIFL-L [OMIM 603212]) has been mapped to human chromosome 3q21-q25 with the use of human-rodent somatic cell hybrids [13]. BFSP2 is one of the cytoskeletal proteins in the lens, which sustains lens cell morphology and participates in lens cell motility, and is very important by functioning in the maintenance of transparency of the lens. We know from the previous report that BFSP1 and BFSP2 mutations can lead to congenital cataracts. But, so far, just one paper has reported that a BFSP1 mutation causes autosomal recessive juvenile onset cataract [12]. There are five reported BFSP2 mutations that were found to induce formation of autosomal dominant congenital cataract. These mutations were mainly in exon 2; clinical types of cataracts induced by BFSP2 gene mutations are polymorphism cataracts, nuclear cataracts, cortical opacity Star cataracts, and gill-like cataracts etc. [14-18]. We first reported mutations in exon 5 of BFSP2, which can cause autosomal dominant congenital cataract, and BFSP2 mutations can also cause congenital lamellar cataracts [14-18]. Lamellar cataracts are a common form of congenital cataract. MIP [19], CRYAB [20], CRYBA1 [21], and HSF4 [22] mutations can cause this. More recently, Jamie et al. [23] described a three-generation pedigree with X-linked congenital lamellar cataract. In this study, we report a four-generation Chinese family with congenital lamellar cataracts. Linkage analysis mapped the disease gene to 3q21–25, and a missense mutation (c.1091G→A) in BFSP2 was identified in this family, which resulted in the substitution of Arg339His (P.R339H) in BFSP2. Analysis of the wild type and mutant proteins suggested that the increased hydrophobicity with the decreased hydrophobic moment of the mutant protein altered regulation activities of the BFSP2 protein and α-crystallin assemblies. These alterations may be the cause of congenital lamellar cataracts.

Methods

Clinical evaluation and DNA specimens

A four-generation family with non-syndromic congenital cataracts was recruited at the Beijing Tongren Eye Center (Capital Medical University, Beijing, China). Informed consent was obtained from each participant as consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki. The phenotype was documented by slit lamp photography. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using standard protocols.

Genotyping

Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed with microsatellite markers close to candidate loci associated with autosomal congenital cataracts. PCR products from each DNA sample were separated from a 6% polyacrylamide gel and were analyzed. Pedigree and haplotype data were performed with Cyrillic (version 2.1) software. Exclusion analysis was performed by allele sharing in affected individuals.

Linkage analysis

A two-point linkage was calculated with the LINKAGE (version 5.1) package. The cataracts in this family were analyzed as an autosomal dominant trait with full penetrance and a gene frequency of 0.001. The allele frequencies for each marker were assumed to be equal in both genders. The marker order and distances between the markers were taken from the NCBI database.

DNA sequencing

Individual exons of the BFSP2 cluster were amplified by PCR using primer pairs shown in Table 1 [18]. The PCR products were sequenced on an ABI3730 Automated Sequencer (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Table 1

Primer sequences for BFSP2.

Gene (Exon)Forward Primers (5′→3′)Reverse Primers (5′→3′)
BFSP2 (1a)
AATGCACAAACCCAAATGGT
AGGCCCTGSSGACACT
BFSP2 (1b)
GAGAGGCGAGTGGTAGTGGA
GGCCTCAGCCTACTCACAAC
BFSP2 (2)
TGCAGACAGAGCATTTCCAC
GAGGGGTGTGAGCTGGATAA
BFSP2 (3)
GCTGCAATTGCCTTCATTTT
GGGTAACCTGACCCAACTTCA
BFSP2 (4)
TCTGTGAAGCCTGTGTCTGG
CCCGGCCTCAATTATTCTTT
BFSP2 (5)
ACCCAGGAGGAGGAGGTTGT
GGGAATCCCCTGGAAACTAA
BFSP2 (6)
GGGGAATAGTCCAGGCTACC
ATGGGTGCCTATGTGAGAGGG
BFSP2 (7)TTGTTCCAAAGGCCAGATTCCACTCAAGGGAATCCTTCCA

Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography

Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) was used to screen the mutation identified in the patients, family members, and 100 normal control subjects in exon 5 of BFSP2 by using a commercial system (Wave DHPLC; Transgenomic, San Jose, CA).

Analysis of protein models with biosoftware

The tertiary structure of the protein is highly conserved. Both mutant and wild type versions of the protein structure were predicted and analyzed using the Swiss-model software (version 3.5), BioEdit software, Phyre software (version 0.2), and Radar.

Results

Clinical data

The proband was a six-year-old female (IV:25) who had bilateral cataracts since birth. Her visual acuity was 0.1 in the right eye and 0.08 in the left eye. Binocular vision correction does not improve. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured to be 15.1 mmHg in the right eye and 16.7 mmHg in the left eye. Other eye examinations included mydriasis later, slit lamp biological microscopy, and performance of the congenital lamellar cataracts (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Slit lamp photographs of proband. The photographs of the proband (IV:25) showed that the opacities were lamellar cataracts.

Slit lamp photographs of proband. The photographs of the proband (IV:25) showed that the opacities were lamellar cataracts. This four-generation family included 17 affected individuals with congenital lamellar cataracts and 56 unaffected individuals (Figure 2). The diagnosis was confirmed by ophthalmologists. The disease feature of this family is congenital morbidity eyes. There was no history of other ocular or systemic abnormalities in the family.
Figure 2

Pedigree and haplotype of cataract family. Four-generation pedigree, with autosomal dominant lamellar cataracts. Haplotyping shows segregation of two microsatellite markers on 3q21-q25. Squares and circles indicate males and females, respectively. Blackened symbols and bars denote affected status.

Pedigree and haplotype of cataract family. Four-generation pedigree, with autosomal dominant lamellar cataracts. Haplotyping shows segregation of two microsatellite markers on 3q21-q25. Squares and circles indicate males and females, respectively. Blackened symbols and bars denote affected status.

Linkage and haplotype analysis

BFSP2 on chromosome 3 was linked to this family while other candidate genes were excluded by allele sharing and linkage analysis. Significant linkage was found with markers D3S2322 and D3S1541, and the maximum LOD score was 7.22 (at θ=0). Haplotype analysis showed that the responsible locus was localized on chromosome 3q21–25 and flanked by markers D3S2322 and D3S1541 (Figure 2 and Table 2).
Table 2

Two-point LOD scores for linkage between cataract locus and markers on chromosome 3.

MarkerLOD scores by recombination fraction (θ)
00.10.20.30.4
D3S2322
7.22
6.08
4.8
3.35
1.72
D3S15415.424.553.582.481.24

Note: The highest observed LOD score was 7.22 (θ=0) for marker D3S2322.

Note: The highest observed LOD score was 7.22 (θ=0) for marker D3S2322.

Mutation analysis for BFSP2

Direct cycle sequencing of the amplified fragments of BFSP2 in two affected individuals identified a single base alteration, C.G1091A (Figure 3B), in exon 5 of BFSP2 (GI: 8419), resulting in the substitution of Arg to His at codon 339 (P.R339H). The remainder of the coding sequence showed no other change.
Figure 3

Multiple-sequence alignment and DNA sequence chromatograms of BFSP2. A: The multiple-sequence alignment of BFSP2 from primates, rodents, cattle, and zebrafish to humans (Homo sapiens) is shown. The Arg339 residue is located within a highly conserved region. B: DNA sequence chromatograms of the P.R339H mutation in BFSP2 are shown. The G→A transversion at position 1091 resulted in the P.R339H mutation.

Multiple-sequence alignment and DNA sequence chromatograms of BFSP2. A: The multiple-sequence alignment of BFSP2 from primates, rodents, cattle, and zebrafish to humans (Homo sapiens) is shown. The Arg339 residue is located within a highly conserved region. B: DNA sequence chromatograms of the P.R339H mutation in BFSP2 are shown. The G→A transversion at position 1091 resulted in the P.R339H mutation.

Multiple-sequence alignment and mutation analysis

BFSP2 family protein sequences were obtained from NCBI and UCSC websites and multiple-sequence alignments of BFSP2 family proteins from various species were obtained (Figure 3A) using the Vector NTI software. We found that codon 339, where the mutation (P.R339H) occurred, was located in a highly conserved region of the protein. DHPLC analysis confirmed this mutation (Figure 4), which cosegregated with all affected individuals in the family. Further, this mutation was not observed in any of the unaffected family members or 100 normal controls.
Figure 4

Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography results of wild type and mutated BFSP2. DHPLC results show a variant trace for BFSP2 compared to the wild type (WT) trace. The profile in purple is the mutant protein. The profile in blue is the wild type protein.

Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography results of wild type and mutated BFSP2. DHPLC results show a variant trace for BFSP2 compared to the wild type (WT) trace. The profile in purple is the mutant protein. The profile in blue is the wild type protein.

Discussion

We identified a new mutation, P.R339H, in BFSP2 in a four-generation Chinese family with autosomal dominant congenital lamellar cataracts. The disease gene was linked to 3q21–25 with a maximum LOD score of 7.22 and spanning BFSP2. Mutation analysis of the candidate gene detected a new mutation, P.R339H, in BFSP2 that cosegregated with the disease phenotype in all affected individuals but was not present in any of the unaffected family members or in 100 normal control subjects. The result of multiple-sequence alignments showed that Arg339 was a highly conserved residue. The lens sutures are specific regions where lens fiber cells from opposite directions merge through complex overlapping and interdigitation of the tips of their membranes [24]. The beaded filament structural protein encoded by BFSP2 is a highly divergent member of the intermediate filament family and a major component of beaded filaments, which are abundant in lens fiber cells, the only cells in which they are known to be expressed. These cytoskeletal structures consist of a 7-9 nm backbone filament with 12-15 nm globular protein particles spaced along it [16]. During lens development, the anterior ends of the lens fiber cells progressively insinuate between the lens epithelium and the embryonic nucleus whereas the posterior ends progressively insinuate between the posterior lens capsule and embryonic nucleus. Elongation continues until the fiber cell ends from opposing directions meet to form the lens sutures [25]. Through direct cycle sequencing, we identified a G→A transversion in exon 5 of BFSP2, which was present only in affected members of the family. This transversion, C.G1091A, was predicted to cause a conservative substitution of Arg to His at codon 339 (p.R339H). This novel mutation in exon 5 of BFSP2 appears to result in congenital lamellar cataracts. From the NCBI database, we know Arg339 is in the active region of the BFSP2 protein. The online Phyre software (version 0.2) was used to compare the three dimensional (3D) structures of the wild type (Figure 5A) with mutant proteins (Figure 5B), and the 3D structure was little changed. BioEdit software predicted that the substitution in the BFSP2 protein would alter the hydrophobicity between amino acids 330 and 340 (Figure 6) and the hydrophobic moment between amino acids 330 and 350 (Figure 7).
Figure 5

Comparison of wild type and mutant BFSP2 3D structures. A: Wild type BFSP2 3D structure using Phyre software is shown, and Arg339 is indicated in yellow and a green arrow. B: Mutant BFSP2 3D structure is shown also using Phyre software, and His339 is indicated in yellow and a green arrow. The 3D structure was not overly changed due to the mutation.

Figure 6

Comparison of hydrophobicity between wild type and mutant BFSP2. BioEdit software predicted the effect of the substitution on BFSP2 protein hydrophobicity. Hydrophobicity of the mutant protein increased between 330 amino acids and 340 amino acids.

Figure 7

Comparison of hydrophobic moment between wild type and mutant BFSP2. BioEdit software predicted the effect of the substitution on the BFSP2 protein hydrophobic moment. The hydrophobic moment of the mutant protein decreased between 330 amino acids and 350 amino acids.

Comparison of wild type and mutant BFSP2 3D structures. A: Wild type BFSP2 3D structure using Phyre software is shown, and Arg339 is indicated in yellow and a green arrow. B: Mutant BFSP2 3D structure is shown also using Phyre software, and His339 is indicated in yellow and a green arrow. The 3D structure was not overly changed due to the mutation. Comparison of hydrophobicity between wild type and mutant BFSP2. BioEdit software predicted the effect of the substitution on BFSP2 protein hydrophobicity. Hydrophobicity of the mutant protein increased between 330 amino acids and 340 amino acids. Comparison of hydrophobic moment between wild type and mutant BFSP2. BioEdit software predicted the effect of the substitution on the BFSP2 protein hydrophobic moment. The hydrophobic moment of the mutant protein decreased between 330 amino acids and 350 amino acids. Furthermore, we used Radar to predict the effect that the substitution would have in the wild type protein with an increase of two to three repeats (Figure 8). Many large proteins have evolved by internal duplication, and many internal sequence repeats correspond to functional and structural units.
Figure 8

The predicted effect of substitution in BFSP2. The online Radar software was used to predict the effect of the substation in BFSP2. The substitution would have in the wild-type protein with an increase from two to three repeats, the part marked by red arrow turned into two parts.

The predicted effect of substitution in BFSP2. The online Radar software was used to predict the effect of the substation in BFSP2. The substitution would have in the wild-type protein with an increase from two to three repeats, the part marked by red arrow turned into two parts. The mechanism of how a mutation in BFSP2 can give rise to cataracts is unknown. BFSP2 shows most of the secondary structural features that are conserved among the intermediate filament (IF) family of proteins [26]. Some reports indicate that BFSP2, filensin, and α-crystallins have been shown to immunolocalize to unique cytoskeletal structures within the lens fiber cells known as beaded filaments. Beaded filaments are considered to be important in facilitating the chaperone activity of α-crystallin assemblies [6,27]. Some reports show that BFSP2 can regulate beaded filament protein stoichiometry [28]. The alteration had little effect on the backbone or 3D structure of the protein. Hydrophobicity of the mutant protein increased while the hydrophobic moment decreased. The predicted new characteristics of the mutant protein, which include altered interactions with other proteins, altered regulation activities of BFSP2, and altered α-crystallin assemblies, may be the cause of the disease.
  26 in total

1.  Congenital progressive polymorphic cataract caused by a mutation in the major intrinsic protein of the lens, MIP (AQP0).

Authors:  P Francis; V Berry; S Bhattacharya; A Moore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A missense mutation in the LIM2 gene is associated with autosomal recessive presenile cataract in an inbred Iraqi Jewish family.

Authors:  Eran Pras; Etgar Levy-Nissenbaum; Tangiz Bakhan; Hadas Lahat; Ehud Assia; Noa Geffen-Carmi; Moshe Frydman; Boleslaw Goldman; Elon Pras
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Targeted genomic deletion of the lens-specific intermediate filament protein CP49.

Authors:  Azita Alizadeh; John I Clark; Teri Seeberger; John Hess; Tom Blankenship; Andrew Spicer; Paul G FitzGerald
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  The genetics of childhood cataract.

Authors:  P J Francis; V Berry; S S Bhattacharya; A T Moore
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  A juvenile-onset, progressive cataract locus on chromosome 3q21-q22 is associated with a missense mutation in the beaded filament structural protein-2.

Authors:  Y P Conley; D Erturk; A Keverline; T S Mah; A Keravala; L R Barnes; A Bruchis; J F Hess; P G FitzGerald; D E Weeks; R E Ferrell; M B Gorin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-22       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Cell death triggered by a novel mutation in the alphaA-crystallin gene underlies autosomal dominant cataract linked to chromosome 21q.

Authors:  Donna S Mackay; Usha P Andley; Alan Shiels
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Autosomal dominant congenital cataract. Interocular phenotypic variability.

Authors:  M H Scott; J F Hejtmancik; L A Wozencraft; L M Reuter; M M Parks; M I Kaiser-Kupfer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Molecular genetic basis of inherited cataract and associated phenotypes.

Authors:  M Ashwin Reddy; Peter J Francis; Vanita Berry; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Anthony T Moore
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Mutant DNA-binding domain of HSF4 is associated with autosomal dominant lamellar and Marner cataract.

Authors:  Lei Bu; Yiping Jin; Yuefeng Shi; Renyuan Chu; Airong Ban; Hans Eiberg; Lisa Andres; Haisong Jiang; Guangyong Zheng; Meiqian Qian; Bin Cui; Yu Xia; Jing Liu; Landian Hu; Guoping Zhao; Michael R Hayden; Xiangyin Kong
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-06-24       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  A novel locus for X-linked congenital cataract on Xq24.

Authors:  Jamie E Craig; Kathryn L Friend; Jozef Gecz; Kate M Rattray; Mark Troski; David A Mackey; Kathryn P Burdon
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.367

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Inherited Congenital Cataract: A Guide to Suspect the Genetic Etiology in the Cataract Genesis.

Authors:  Olga Messina-Baas; Sergio A Cuevas-Covarrubias
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 2.  Functions of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton in the eye lens.

Authors:  Shuhua Song; Andrew Landsbury; Ralf Dahm; Yizhi Liu; Qingjiong Zhang; Roy A Quinlan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Phenotypes of Recessive Pediatric Cataract in a Cohort of Children with Identified Homozygous Gene Mutations (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Arif O Khan; Mohammed A Aldahmesh; Fowzan S Alkuraya
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2015

4.  Epidemiology and molecular genetics of congenital cataracts.

Authors:  Jun Yi; Jun Yun; Zhi-Kui Li; Chang-Tai Xu; Bo-Rong Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  A new locus for autosomal dominant congenital coronary cataract in a Chinese family maps to chromosome 3q.

Authors:  Guishun Liu; Yunbo Li; Yanfei Ruan; Wenping Cao; Li Xin; Jiangyuan Qian; Jingzhi Gu
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Factors associated with strabismus after cataract extraction and primary intraocular lens implantation in congenital cataracts.

Authors:  Soo Jung Lee; Wan-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Combinational analysis of linkage and exome sequencing identifies the causative mutation in a Chinese family with congenital cataract.

Authors:  Xueyuan Jia; Feng Zhang; Jing Bai; Linghan Gao; Xuelong Zhang; Haiming Sun; Donglin Sun; Rongwei Guan; Wenjing Sun; Lidan Xu; Zhichao Yue; Yang Yu; Songbin Fu
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  A novel beaded filament structural protein 1 (BFSP1) gene mutation associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataract in a Chinese family.

Authors:  Han Wang; Tianxiao Zhang; Di Wu; Jinsong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  Targeted Exome Sequencing of Congenital Cataracts Related Genes: Broadening the Mutation Spectrum and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in 27 Chinese Han Families.

Authors:  Yi Zhai; Jinyu Li; Wangshu Yu; Sha Zhu; Yinhui Yu; Menghan Wu; Guizhen Sun; Xiaohua Gong; Ke Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Evaluating the association of bone morphogenetic protein 4-V152A and SIX homeobox 6-H141N polymorphisms with congenital cataract and microphthalmia in Western Indian population.

Authors:  N G Vidya; A R Vasavada; S Rajkumar
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.476

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.