Literature DB >> 18957192

Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.

Laura Bonetta.   

Abstract

Over the next couple of years, NIH will be revising its process of reviewing grant applications. The planned changes will make the NIH system more similar in some ways to those of European funding agencies, while retaining many unique features.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18957192     DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  7 in total

1.  NIH peer review reform--change we need, or lipstick on a pig?

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  The Delphi process: a solution for reviewing novel grant applications.

Authors:  Cath Holliday; Monica Robotin
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-08-30

3.  Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study.

Authors:  Danielle L Herbert; Nicholas Graves; Philip Clarke; Adrian G Barnett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The impact of funding deadlines on personal workloads, stress and family relationships: a qualitative study of Australian researchers.

Authors:  Danielle L Herbert; John Coveney; Philip Clarke; Nicholas Graves; Adrian G Barnett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sheila Turner; Abby Bull; Fay Chinnery; Jeremy Hinks; Nicola Mcardle; Rebecca Moran; Helen Payne; Eleanor Woodford Guegan; Louise Worswick; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Influence of external peer reviewer scores for funding applications on funding board decisions: a retrospective analysis of 1561 reviews.

Authors:  Lexy Sorrell; Nicola Mcardle; Taeko Becque; Helen Payne; Beth Stuart; Sheila Turner; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis.

Authors:  Alejandra Recio-Saucedo; Ksenia Crane; Katie Meadmore; Kathryn Fackrell; Hazel Church; Simon Fraser; Amanda Blatch-Jones
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2022-03-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.