Literature DB >> 18956863

Virtual screening for R-groups, including predicted pIC50 contributions, within large structural databases, using Topomer CoMFA.

Richard D Cramer1, Phillip Cruz, Gunther Stahl, William C Curtiss, Brian Campbell, Brian B Masek, Farhad Soltanshahi.   

Abstract

Multiple R-groups (monovalent fragments) are implicitly accessible within most of the molecular structures that populate large structural databases. R-group searching would desirably consider pIC50 contribution forecasts as well as ligand similarities or docking scores. However, R-group searching, with or without pIC50 forecasts, is currently not practical. The most prevalent and reliable source of pIC50 predictions, existing 3D-QSAR approaches, is also difficult and somewhat subjective. Yet in 25 of 25 trials on data sets on which a field-based 3D-QSAR treatment had already succeeded, substitution of objective (canonically generated) topomer poses for the original structure-guided manual alignments produced acceptable 3D-QSAR models, on average having almost equivalent statistical quality to the published models, and with negligible effort. Their overall pIC50 prediction error is 0.805, calculated as the average over these 25 topomer CoMFA models in the standard deviations of pIC50 predictions, derived from the 1109 possible "leave-out-one-R-group" (LOORG) pIC50 contributions. (This novel LOORG protocol provides a more realistic and stringent test of prediction accuracy than the customary "leave-out-one-compound" LOO approach.) The associated average predictive r(2) of 0.495 indicates a pIC50 prediction accuracy roughly halfway between perfect and useless. To assess the ability of topomer-CoMFA based virtual screening to identify "highly active" R-groups, a Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) approach was adopted. Using, as the binary criterion for a "highly active" R-group, a predicted pIC50 greater than the top 25% of the observed pIC50 range, the ROC area averaged across the 25 topomer CoMFA models is 0.729. Conventionally interpreted, the odds that a "highly active" R-group will indeed confer such a high pIC50 are 0.729/(1-0.729) or almost 3 to 1. To confirm that virtual screening within large collections of realized structures would provide a useful quantity and variety of R-group suggestions, combining shape similarity with the "highly active" pIC50, the 50 searches provided by these 25 models were applied to 2.2 million structurally distinct R-group candidates among 2.0 million structures within a ZINC database, identifying an average of 5705 R-groups per search, with the highest predicted pIC50 combination averaging 1.6 log units greater than the highest reported pIC50s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18956863     DOI: 10.1021/ci8001556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  10 in total

1.  R-group template CoMFA combines benefits of "ad hoc" and topomer alignments using 3D-QSAR for lead optimization.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Tautomers and topomers: challenging the uncertainties of direct physicochemical modeling.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?

Authors:  Artem Cherkasov; Eugene N Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek; Igor I Baskin; Mark Cronin; John Dearden; Paola Gramatica; Yvonne C Martin; Roberto Todeschini; Viviana Consonni; Victor E Kuz'min; Richard Cramer; Romualdo Benigni; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Lothar Terfloth; Johann Gasteiger; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Herman Skolnik award symposium honoring Yvonne Martin.

Authors:  Wendy A Warr
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Antitumor evaluation and 3D-QSAR studies of a new series of the spiropyrroloquinoline isoindolinone/aza-isoindolinone derivatives by comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA).

Authors:  Masoud Sadeghzadeh; Maryam Salahinejad; Nahid Zarezadeh; Mehdi Ghandi; Maryam Keshavarz Baghery
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.943

6.  Two- and three-dimensional QSAR studies on hURAT1 inhibitors with flexible linkers: topomer CoMFA and HQSAR.

Authors:  Tingting Zhao; Zean Zhao; Fengting Lu; Shan Chang; Jiajie Zhang; Jianxin Pang; Yuanxin Tian
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 7.  Recent advances in fragment-based QSAR and multi-dimensional QSAR methods.

Authors:  Kyaw Zeyar Myint; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Modeling MEK4 Kinase Inhibitors through Perturbed Electrostatic Potential Charges.

Authors:  Rama K Mishra; Kristine K Deibler; Matthew R Clutter; Purav P Vagadia; Matthew O'Connor; Gary E Schiltz; Raymond Bergan; Karl A Scheidt
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Rethinking 3D-QSAR.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  The inevitable QSAR renaissance.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.