Literature DB >> 18956149

Radiation dose evaluations during radiological contrast studies in patients with morbid obesity.

O Rampado1, L Luberto, R Faletti, E Garelli, M C Cassinis, R Ropolo, G Gandini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiation dose to patients during radiological contrast studies performed after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) surgery in patients with morbid obesity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose evaluations were performed on a sample of 39 patients (32 women and 7 men) with a mean weight of 117 kg (range 68-175 kg) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43.7 (range 22.2-54.9). Between the second and seventh postoperative day, patients underwent radiological follow-up after oral administration of approximately 70 ml of water-soluble iodinated contrast material (Gastrografin) and images acquired in anteroposterior, right and left oblique projections with the patient upright and then supine. Exposure conditions, dose-area product (DAP) and entrance skin dose (ESD) were recorded for each procedure. On the basis of these data, the effective dose (ED) was calculated using simulation software based on the Monte Carlo method for determining the absorbed dose to organs. To assess the optimal exposure conditions and the dose contributions of fluoroscopy and radiography, the effective dose rates were also evaluated using Plexiglas phantoms of different thickness to simulate different patient sizes.
RESULTS: The phantom measurements showed a fourfold dose increase when passing from normal-sized patients to obese patients. Mean DAP value obtained from in-vivo measurements was 70 Gy cm(2) (range 17-147 Gy cm(2)), and mean effective dose was 21 mSv (range 5-45 mSv).
CONCLUSIONS: When performing radiological contrast studies in patients with morbid obesity, every possible precaution should be taken to minimise patient dose. Special care should be taken to evaluate justification of the radiological procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18956149     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-008-0335-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  10 in total

1.  Radiation doses for barium enema and barium meal examinations in Ireland: potential diagnostic reference levels.

Authors:  E M Carroll; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiation doses to patients undergoing barium meal and barium enema examinations.

Authors:  M G Delichas; K Hatziioannou; E Papanastassiou; P Albanopoulou; E Chatzi; A Sioundas; K Psarrakos
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 3.  Endovascular and interventional procedures in obese patients: a review of procedural technique modifications and radiation management.

Authors:  Scott G Bryk; Michael L Censullo; Louis K Wagner; Lucho L Rossman; Alan M Cohen
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Gastric bypass in morbid obesity.

Authors:  E E Mason; K J Printen; T J Blommers; J W Lewis; D H Scott
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Patient dose during radiological examination in the follow-up of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Luca Moro; Claudio Cazzani; Orazio Tomarchio; Giovanni Morone; Antonio Catona; Daniele Fantinato
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  The role of early radiological studies after gastric bariatric surgery.

Authors:  M Toppino; F Cesarani; A Comba; F Denegri; M Mistrangelo; G Gandini; F Morino
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  S Sauerland; L Angrisani; M Belachew; J M Chevallier; F Favretti; N Finer; A Fingerhut; M Garcia Caballero; J A Guisado Macias; R Mittermair; M Morino; S Msika; F Rubino; R Tacchino; R Weiner; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A review of factors affecting patient doses for barium enemas and meals.

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  A comparison of patient dose for examinations of the upper gastrointestinal tract at 11 conventional and digital X-ray units in The Netherlands.

Authors:  J Geleijns; J J Broerse; M P Chandie Shaw; F W Schultz; W Teeuwisse; J G Van Unnik; J Zoetelief
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Barium enema: use of increased copper filtration to optimize dose and image quality.

Authors:  R E Morrell; A T Rogers; J C Jobling; K E Shakespeare
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.039

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.