Marte Bale1, Liv Inger Strand. 1. Section of Physical Therapy, Førde Central Hospital (FSS), Førde, Norway. marte.bale@c2i.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of functional strength training in subacute stroke. DESIGN: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Two rehabilitation units. SUBJECTS:Eighteen patients in the subacute phase post stroke, randomly allocated to a functional strength training (intervention) group (n = 8) and a training-as-usual (comparison) group (n = 10). INTERVENTION: The functional strength training group participated in functional progressive strength training of the affected lower extremity. The training-as-usual group had traditional training, excessive muscle power being avoided to prevent associated reactions. All trained 50 minutes five days a week for four weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Maximum weight-bearing in standing (primary outcome), isometric muscle strength, gait speed and items of Motor Assessment Scale. RESULTS:Maximum weight-bearing on the affected leg improved more in the functional strength training group (mean 17.4% of body weight) than in the training-as-usual group (mean 5.6% of body weight), but taking test data at inclusion into consideration, the difference in change was not statistically significant (P = 0.056). More patients in the functional strength training group (57%) could weight-bear on the affected leg while stepping forward, than in the training-as-usual group (17%). Improvement was clinically significant in 7 of 9 outcome measures in the functional strength training group (effect size > or = 0.80, large), but in only 3 of 9 in the training-as-usual group. All patients in the functional strength training group and 70% of the patients in the training-as-usual group rated their overall status as 'much' or 'very much' improved. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that functional strength training of lower extremities improves physical performance more than traditional training.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of functional strength training in subacute stroke. DESIGN: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Two rehabilitation units. SUBJECTS: Eighteen patients in the subacute phase post stroke, randomly allocated to a functional strength training (intervention) group (n = 8) and a training-as-usual (comparison) group (n = 10). INTERVENTION: The functional strength training group participated in functional progressive strength training of the affected lower extremity. The training-as-usual group had traditional training, excessive muscle power being avoided to prevent associated reactions. All trained 50 minutes five days a week for four weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Maximum weight-bearing in standing (primary outcome), isometric muscle strength, gait speed and items of Motor Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Maximum weight-bearing on the affected leg improved more in the functional strength training group (mean 17.4% of body weight) than in the training-as-usual group (mean 5.6% of body weight), but taking test data at inclusion into consideration, the difference in change was not statistically significant (P = 0.056). More patients in the functional strength training group (57%) could weight-bear on the affected leg while stepping forward, than in the training-as-usual group (17%). Improvement was clinically significant in 7 of 9 outcome measures in the functional strength training group (effect size > or = 0.80, large), but in only 3 of 9 in the training-as-usual group. All patients in the functional strength training group and 70% of the patients in the training-as-usual group rated their overall status as 'much' or 'very much' improved. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that functional strength training of lower extremities improves physical performance more than traditional training.
Authors: David H Saunders; Mark Sanderson; Sara Hayes; Maeve Kilrane; Carolyn A Greig; Miriam Brazzelli; Gillian E Mead Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-03-24
Authors: Frederick M Ivey; Steven J Prior; Charlene E Hafer-Macko; Leslie I Katzel; Richard F Macko; Alice S Ryan Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Janne Marieke Veerbeek; Erwin van Wegen; Roland van Peppen; Philip Jan van der Wees; Erik Hendriks; Marc Rietberg; Gert Kwakkel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kathryn Mares; Jane Cross; Allan Clark; Susan Vaughan; Garry R Barton; Fiona Poland; Kate McGlashan; Martin Watson; Phyo K Myint; Marie-Luce O'Driscoll; Valerie M Pomeroy Journal: Trials Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 2.279