| Literature DB >> 18955345 |
Naoto Ishizaki1, Tadashi Yano, Kenji Kawakita.
Abstract
Acupuncture originated in China and is widespread throughout Asia. It is expected that a higher utilization of this remedy exists in these countries compared to Western countries. We conducted annual nationwide surveys from 2003 through 2006 on the utilization of acupuncture in Japan. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 2000 individuals randomly chosen from the resident database. Annual utilization percentages, based on the number of respondents, from 2003 to 2006 were 6.5%, 4.8%, 6.4%, and 6.7%, respectively, while lifetime experiences determined in each surveys were estimated as 26.7, 19.4, 24.4 and 25.4, respectively. Respondents who had utilized acupuncture and/or moxibustion tended to be older than those who had no experience. Acupuncture was mainly used for musculoskeletal symptoms, and a detailed breakdown of the musculoskeletal symptoms identified in the 2005 survey showed 50.9% for low back pain, 35.9% for shoulder stiffness and 12.0% for knee pain. Reasons given for continuing therapy included the effective amelioration of symptoms, comfort of the procedure and low number of side-effects, while those who decided against continuing cited no improvement of symptoms, cost and lack of time for treatment. In conclusion, annual utilization of acupuncture and/or moxibustion was estimated at more than 6%, and the percentage of those with a lifetime experience was ∼25%, thus demonstrating the relatively higher utilization of the remedy in Japan over utilization in western countries. Application of the treatment for musculoskeletal problems and utilization by the older population were specific standouts of the use of acupuncture and/or moxibustion in Japan.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18955345 PMCID: PMC2892353 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nen037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The number of facilities that provides acupuncture and/or moxibustion
| Kind of license | Year | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 1994 | 1996 | 1998 | 2000 | 2002 | 2004 | |
| Acupuncture and moxibustion | 12 055 | 12 481 | 13 166 | 13 455 | 14 216 | 14 008 | 14 993 |
| Amma, massage, shiatsu and, acupuncture and moxibustion | 28 624 | 29 451 | 30 850 | 31 434 | 32 024 | 32 722 | 33 601 |
Percentage of the subjects who saw acupuncture practitioner in the past 12 months, by age and sex
| Age group (years) | Survey year | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||
| Percentage (95% CI) | M/F | Percentage (95% CI) | M/F | Percentage (95% CI) | M/F | Percentage (95% CI) | M/F | |
| 20–39 | 3.4 (1.6–5.9) | 3.1/3.6 | 2.8 (1.2–5.3) | 4.1/2.0 | 4.1 (2.1–6.9) | 4.2/4.0 | 3.9 (1.9–6.8) | 4.8/3.1 |
| 40–59 | 6.6 (4.4–9.3) | 5.6/7.4 | 3.4 (1.8–5.6) | 2.8/3.8 | 5.7 (3.5–8.4) | 5.3/5.9 | 6.9 (4.6–9.8) | 7.5/6.4 |
| 60≤ | 9.5 (6.4–12.9) | 4.3/13.6 | 8.5 (5.6–12.2) | 6.5/10.3 | 9.3 (6.4–12.8) | 6.9/11.8 | 8.6 (5.8–11.9) | 9.1/8.0 |
| 0.001 | – | <0.001 | – | 0.006 | – | 0.027 | – | |
| Overall | 6.5 (5.1–8.2) | 4.4/8.3 | 4.8 (3.5–6.3) | 4.4/5.0 | 6.4 (5.0–8.0) | 5.7/7.0 | 6.7 (5.2–8.3) | 7.4/6.0 |
Total number of the respondents (denominator) except who answered to the question as ‘Do not Know’ were, 1405, 1316, 1330 and 1335 in the survey year 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively; aP < 0.01 (Differences in the proportion between male and female subjects according to the Fisher's exact test); bProbabilities of difference between age groups according to chi-square test with 1 df.
Percentage of the subjects who had answered to have lifetime experience of acupuncture and/or moxibustion, by age and sex
| Age group | Survey year | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||
| Percentage (95% CI) | M/F | Percentage (95% CI) | M/F | Percentage (95% CI) | M/F | Percentage (95% CI) | M/F | |
| 20–39 | 16.3 (12.4–20.8) | 14.9/17.6 | 12.3 (8.8–16.5) | 9.0/14.3 | 13.7 (10.0–18.0) | 13.2/14.1 | 16.1 (11.9–20.9) | 16.4/15.9 |
| 40–59 | 29.0 (24.7–33.5) | 28.1/29.7 | 17.0 (13.5–21.0) | 18.5/16.0 | 25.5 (21.1–30.1) | 25.4/25.5 | 24.0 (19.8–28.5) | 28.3/20.6 |
| 60≤ | 33.7 (28.6–39.0) | 28.2/38.0 | 29.4 (24.3–34.8) | 30.8/28.2 | 33.0 (28.0–38.2) | 34.2/31.8 | 34.0 (29.1–39.1) | 31.8/36.4 |
| Overall | 26.7 (24.1–29.4) | 24.1/28.8 | 19.4 (17.0–21.9) | 20.1/18.8 | 24.4 (21.8–27.1) | 25.9/23.5 | 25.4 (22.7–28.1) | 26.5/24.4 |
Total number of the respondents (denominator) except who answered to the question as ‘Do not Know’ were, 1405, 1316, 1330 and 1335 in the survey year 2003, 3004, 2005 and 2006, respectively; aP < 0.05 (Differences in the proportion between male and female subjects according to the Fisher's exact test).
Percentage of the subjects who visited acupuncture clinic within the past 12 months, by age and city scale
| Age group | Scale | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major city | City | Town/village | Overall | ||
| 2003 | |||||
| 20–39 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 0.036 | 3.4 |
| 40–59 | 7.1 | 4.3 | 12.0 | 0.014 | 6.6 |
| 60≤ | 17.9 | 8.5 | 5.7 | 0.007 | 9.5 |
| Total | 9.7 | 4.9 | 7.6 | 0.010 | 6.5 |
| 2004 | |||||
| 20–39 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 0.816 | 2.8 |
| 40–59 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 0.746 | 3.4 |
| 60≤ | 7.1 | 8.1 | 10.5 | 0.690 | 8.5 |
| Total | 4.4 | 4.6 | 5.6 | 0.763 | 4.8 |
| 2005 | |||||
| 20–39 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 0.597 | 4.1 |
| 40–59 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 3.9 | 0.632 | 5.7 |
| 60≤ | 10.8 | 8.1 | 10.7 | 0.649 | 9.3 |
| Total | 7.6 | 5.9 | 6.3 | 0.571 | 6.4 |
| 2006 | |||||
| 20–39 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 0.591 | 3.9 |
| 40–59 | 7.4 | 4.6 | 14.5 | 0.007 | 6.9 |
| 60≤ | 10.2 | 8.0 | 8.3 | 0.787 | 8.6 |
| Total | 7.4 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 0.257 | 6.7 |
aProbabilities according to the chi-square test between different city scales.
Percentage of the utilization of acupuncture in the past 12 months, by age and education level
| Age group | Education | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Junior high | High | College or higher | Overall | ||
| 2003 | |||||
| 20–39 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 0.544 | 3.4 |
| 40–59 | 13.5 | 6.7 | 4.5 | 0.076 | 6.6 |
| 60≤ | 9.5 | 9.4 | 10.4 | 0.903 | 9.5 |
| Total | 10.1 | 6.3 | 5.1 | 0.037 | 6.5 |
| 2004 | |||||
| 20–39 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 0.923 | 2.8 |
| 40–59 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 0.968 | 3.4 |
| 60≤ | 10.7 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 0.216 | 8.6 |
| Total | 9.0 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 0.006 | 4.8 |
| 2005 | |||||
| 20–39 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 3.6 | 0.589 | 4.1 |
| 40–59 | 0.0 | 5.8 | 6.0 | 0.357 | 5.5 |
| 60≤ | 9.0 | 8.4 | 13.3 | 0.502 | 9.3 |
| Total | 7.0 | 6.4 | 5.9 | 0.859 | 6.4 |
| 2006 | |||||
| 20–39 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 0.710 | 3.9 |
| 40–59 | 6.3 | 8.1 | 5.3 | 0.508 | 6.9 |
| 60≤ | 7.1 | 9.5 | 9.0 | 0.709 | 8.6 |
| Total | 6.4 | 7.6 | 5.3 | 0.322 | 6.7 |
aDifferences in the proportion between different education levels according to the chi-square test.
Reason to utilize acupuncture and/or moxibustion (results from survey of 2003)
| Reason | Overall users | By sex | By period of utilization | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage | 95% CI | Male | Female | Past 12 Months | More than 1 year ago | |||
| Recommendation of family or friends | 58.7 | 52.7–64.3 | 60.5 | 57.4 | 0.594 | 50.5 | 61.9 | 0.048 |
| Not satisfied with conventional medicine | 12.8 | 9.1–17.1 | 15.1 | 11.2 | 0.274 | 16.8 | 11.2 | 0.170 |
| Do not want to use drugs | 12.5 | 8.9–16.8 | 9.2 | 14.8 | 0.115 | 17.8 | 10.4 | 0.059 |
| Not serious condition | 11.7 | 8.2–15.9 | 7.2 | 14.8 | 0.033 | 15.9 | 10.4 | 0.154 |
| Recommendation of MDs | 8.8 | 12.6–5.8 | 7.9 | 9.4 | 0.712 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 0.841 |
| Saw the clinic facilities | 5.6 | 3.2–8.8 | 6.6 | 4.9 | 0.502 | 5.6 | 5.6 | >0.99 |
| Saw advertisement (TV, Radio, Internet) | 1.6 | 0.5–3.7 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 0.085 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 0.679 |
| Others | 4.8 | 2.6–7.8 | 6.6 | 3.6 | 0.221 | 4.7 | 4.9 | >0.99 |
Total number of the respondents = 375; aSummation of each percentage will not be 100 because of multiple answers; bDifference between males and females (Fisher's exact test probabilities); cDifference between utilization periods (Fisher's exact test probabilities).
Medical condition/purposes for which acupuncture was used (results from survey of 2003)
| Conditon | Overall users | Sex | Period of utilization | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage | (95% CI) | Male | Female | ≤12 Months | >12 Months | |||
| Musculoskeletal problems | 81.6 | (76.6–85.8) | 84.9 | 79.4 | 0.222 | 78.5 | 82.8 | 0.376 |
| Fatigue | 6.9 | (4.2–10.4) | 6.6 | 7.2 | >0.99 | 12.1 | 4.9 | 0.022 |
| Health promotion | 5.1 | (2.8–8.2) | 3.3 | 6.3 | 0.236 | 11.2 | 2.6 | 0.001 |
| Headache | 4.8 | (2.6–7.8) | 4.6 | 4.9 | >0.99 | 7.5 | 3.7 | 0.178 |
| Eyestrain | 3.2 | (1.5–5.8) | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.374 | 4.7 | 2.6 | 0.335 |
| Digestive symptoms | 2.9 | (1.3–5.5) | 2.0 | 3.6 | 0.536 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 0.517 |
| Tinnitus/Hearing loss | 1.9 | (0.6–4.1) | 1.3 | 2.2 | 0.706 | 1.9 | 1.9 | >0.99 |
| Paralysis | 1.3 | (0.3–3.3) | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.652 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.626 |
| Urination problems | 0.3 | (0.0–1.6) | 0.0 | 0.4 | >0.99 | 0 | 0.4 | >0.99 |
| Others | 11.5 | (8.0–15.6) | 10.5 | 12.1 | 0.742 | 7.5 | 13.1 | 0.152 |
Total number of the respondents = 375; aSummation of each percentage will not be 100 because of multiple answers; bDifference between males and females (Fisher's exact test probabilities); cDifference between utilization periods (Fisher's exact test probabilities).
Breakdown of the musculoskeletal problem for which acupuncture was used (survey of 2005)
| Kind of the problem | Overall Users | By sex | By utilization period | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage | (95% CI) | Male | Female | <12 months | >12 months | |||
| Low back pain | 50.9 | 44.5–57.1 | 60.3 | 42.9 | 0.002 | 52.5 | 50.2 | 0.719 |
| Shoulder stiffness | 35.9 | 29.9–42.0 | 28.5 | 42.3 | 0.011 | 38.4 | 34.8 | 0.533 |
| Knee pain | 12.0 | 8.2–16.5 | 9.9 | 13.7 | 0.310 | 20.2 | 8.4 | 0.005 |
| Shoulder pain | 5.2 | 2.8–8.6 | 6.0 | 4.6 | 0.624 | 6.1 | 4.8 | 0.601 |
| Neuralgia | 4.3 | 2.1–7.5 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 0.791 | 5.1 | 4.0 | 0.767 |
| Sports injury | 3.4 | 1.5–6.3 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 0.357 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 0.319 |
| Numbness in hands | 3.4 | 1.5–6.3 | 3.3 | 3.4 | >0.99 | 3.0 | 3.5 | >0.99 |
| Numbness in foots | 3.4 | 1.5–6.3 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 0.760 | 6.1 | 2.2 | 0.096 |
| Other joint pain | 2.5 | 0.9–5.1 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 0.729 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.703 |
| Other | 14.1 | 10.0–18.9 | 9.9 | 17.7 | 0.055 | 12.1 | 15.0 | 0.604 |
Total number of the subjects = 326; aSummation of the percentage will not be 100 because of multiplied answers; bDifference between males and females (based on Fisher's exact test probabilities); cDifference between utilization periods (Fisher's exact test probabilities).
Percentage of respondents who have showed their intention to continue acupuncture and its reason (survey of 2003)
| Reason | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Continue 50.4%(189/375) | |
| Amelioration of the Symptom | 76.2 |
| Comfortable | 37.6 |
| Low number of side-effects | 21.7 |
| Convenient | 15.9 |
| Easy to visit | 9.5 |
| Favor with the practitioner | 5.8 |
| Inexpensive | 4.2 |
| Favor with the facilities | 2.1 |
| Other | 2.1 |
| Not to continue 37.1 (139/375) | |
| No amelioration of the symptom | 42.4 |
| Expensive | 20.9 |
| Lack of time | 13.7 |
| Uncomfortable | 10.8 |
| Not easy to visit | 8.6 |
| Had adverse effects | 3.6 |
| Not in favor with the practitioner | 1.4 |
| Not in favor with the facilities | 0.7 |
| Other | 19.4 |