| Literature DB >> 18955217 |
Chinami Matsumoto1, Tetsuko Kojima, Kazuo Ogawa, Satoshi Kamegai, Takuya Oyama, Yukari Shibagaki, Tetsuo Kawasaki, Hiroshi Fujinaga, Kozo Takahashi, Hiroaki Hikiami, Hirozo Goto, Chizuru Kiga, Keiichi Koizumi, Hiroaki Sakurai, Hiroshi Muramoto, Yutaka Shimada, Masahiro Yamamoto, Katsutoshi Terasawa, Shuichi Takeda, Ikuo Saiki.
Abstract
'Oketsu' is a pathophysiologic concept in Japanese traditional (Kampo) medicine, primarily denoting blood stasis/stagnant syndrome. Here we have explored plasma protein biomarkers and/or diagnostic algorithms for 'Oketsu'. Sixteen rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were treated with keishibukuryogan (KBG), a representative Kampo medicine for improving 'Oketsu'. Plasma samples were diagnosed as either having an 'Oketsu' (n = 19) or 'non-Oketsu' (n = 29) state according to Terasawa's 'Oketsu' scoring system. Protein profiles were obtained by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) and hierarchical clustering and decision tree analyses were performed. KBG treatment for 4 or 12 weeks decreased the 'Oketsu' scores significantly. SELDI protein profiles gave 266 protein peaks, whose expression was significantly different between the 'Oketsu' and 'non-Oketsu' states. Hierarchical clustering gave three major clusters (I, II, III). The majority (68.4%) of 'Oketsu' samples were clustered into one cluster as the principal component of cluster I. The remaining 'Oketsu' profiles constituted a minor component of cluster II and were all derived from patients cured of the 'Oketsu' state at 12 weeks. Construction of the decision tree addressed the possibility of developing a diagnostic algorithm for 'Oketsu'. A reduction in measurement/pre-processing conditions (from 55 to 16) gave a similar outcome in the clustering and decision tree analyses. The present study suggests that the pathophysiologic concept of Kampo medicine 'Oketsu' has a physical basis in terms of the profile of blood proteins. It may be possible to establish a set of objective criteria for diagnosing 'Oketsu' using a combination of proteomic and bioinformatics-based classification methods.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18955217 PMCID: PMC2586309 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nem049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1.Three-dimensional (3D) HPLC profile of KBG and UV spectra of its constituent crude drugs.
Diagnostic criteria for ‘Oketsu’ syndrome
| Symptom | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |
| Dark-rimmed eyes | 10 | 10 |
| Areas of dark pigmentation of facial skin | 2 | 2 |
| Rough skin | 2 | 5 |
| Livid lips | 2 | 2 |
| Livid gingiva | 10 | 5 |
| Livid tongue | 10 | 10 |
| Telangiectasis/vascular spiders | 5 | 5 |
| Subcutaneous hemorrhage | 2 | 10 |
| Palmar erythema | 2 | 5 |
| Resistance and tenderness on pressure of the left para-umbilical region | 5 | 5 |
| Resistance and tenderness on pressure of the right para-umbilical region | 10 | 10 |
| Resistance and tenderness on pressure of the umbilical region | 5 | 5 |
| Resistance and/or tenderness on pressure of the ileo-cecal region | 5 | 2 |
| Resistance and/or tenderness on pressure of the sigmoidal region | 5 | 5 |
| Resistance and/or tenderness on pressure of the subcostal region | 5 | 5 |
| Hemorrhoids | 10 | 5 |
| Dysmenorrhea | – | 10 |
A total score larger than 20 is diagnosed as an ‘Oketsu’ state and that not exceeding 20 is diagnosed as a ‘non-Oketsu’ state. Mild symptoms are designated by half points.
Figure 2.Flow charts of plasma processing for SELDI ProteinChip. (A) Unfractionated plasma (Urea) (B) Unfractionated plasma (PBS) (C) Anion exchange fractionation of plasma. Each plasma was divided into three aliquots and each aliquot was further processed according to the procedures denoted by (A), (B), (C). To cover as wide a range of peaks as possible, combinations of multiple ProteinChip previously optimized for each sample preparation were used.
Oketsu score and age/sex distribution of subjects
| Subject number | Age | Sex | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 week | 4 weeks | 12 weeks | 0W → 12W | ||||
| 1 | 56 | Female | 49 | 32 | 34 | ↓ | |
| 2 | 67 | Female | 35 | 10 | 15 | ↓ | |
| 3 | 65 | Female | 20 | 20 | 20 | → | non- |
| 4 | 62 | Male | 10 | 10 | 10 | → | non- |
| 5 | 68 | Female | 17 | 17 | 14.5 | ↓ | non- |
| 6 | 64 | Female | 15 | 15 | 20 | ↑ | non- |
| 7 | 63 | Female | 17 | 17 | 17 | → | non- |
| 8 | 54 | Female | 27 | 17 | 10 | ↓ | |
| 9 | 54 | Female | 25 | 12.5 | 5 | ↓ | |
| 10 | 52 | Female | 25 | 25 | 15 | ↓ | |
| 11 | 70 | Male | 32.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 | ↓ | |
| 12 | 47 | Female | 15 | 15 | 5 | ↓ | non- |
| 13 | 69 | Female | 37 | 27 | 15 | ↓ | |
| 14 | 46 | Female | 38 | 27 | 19.5 | ↓ | |
| 15 | 79 | Male | 30 | 30 | 25 | ↓ | |
| 16 | 51 | Female | 39.5 | 39.5 | 44 | ↑ | |
↓: decrease, →: no change, ↑: increase.
Figure 3.Change in oketsu score after administration of KBG. The averaged values of oketsu score was evaluated at week 0 (pre-treatment) and 4 and 12 weeks after the commencement of KBG treatment. *P < 0.05 vs week 0, determined by paired t-test with Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparison.
Figure 4.Hierarchical clustering of 55 SELDI profiles. Clustering was based on the 266 differential peaks obtained from 55 SELDI profiles and ‘Oketsu’/ ‘non-Oketsu’ classification. The red (peak maximum = 1) or green (peak minimum = 0) color indicates the relative intensity, i.e. higher than or lower than the median value (black color), respectively.
A comparison of outcome of C5.0 with different features in the test set (55 SELDI profiles)
| classifier | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C5.0 | 69.8 | 78.8 | 65.3 |
| PCA+C5.0 | 70.8 | 59.0 | 81.5 |
| C5.0 (high-factor-loading) | 65.7 | 74.2 | 62.0 |
PCA + C5.0: C5.0 tree constructed with five principal components obtained by PCA for splitters, C5.0 (high-factor-loading): C5.0 tree constructed with ten highest-factor-loading peaks for each of the principal components for splitters.
Figure 5.Classification of ‘Oketsu’ and ‘non-Oketsu’ using the decision tree (C5.0) in the training set (55 SELDI profiles). If the answer to the question in a node of the tree is yes, proceed down to the left node; otherwise proceed down to the right node. M represents the m/z.
Figure 6.Hierarchical clustering of 16 SELDI profiles. Clustering was based on the 185 differential peaks obtained from 16 SELDI profiles and ‘Oketsu’/’non-Oketsu’ classification. The red (peak maximum = 1) or green (peak minimum = 0) color indicates the relative intensity, i.e. higher than or lower than the median value (black color), respectively.
A comparison of outcome of C5.0 with different features in the test set (16 SELDI profiles)
| Classifier | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C5.0 | 75.0 | 79.6 | 74.0 |
| PCA+C5.0 | 72.9 | 73.3 | 74.6 |
| C5.0 (high-factor-loading) | 66.7 | 62.7 | 71.2 |
PCA + C5.0: C5.0 tree constructed with five principal components obtained by PCA for splitters, C5.0 (high-factor-loading): C5.0 tree constructed with ten highest-factor-loading peaks for each of the principal components for splitters.
Figure 7.Classification of ‘Oketsu’/’non-Oketsu’ using the decision tree (C5.0) in the training set (16 SELDI profiles). If the answer to the question in a node of the tree is yes, proceed down to the left node; otherwise, proceed down to the right node. M represents the m/z.