Literature DB >> 18955170

High resolution computed tomography of the vertebrae yields accurate information on trabecular distances if processed by 3D fuzzy segmentation approaches.

Andreas Krebs1, Christian Graeff, Isolde Frieling, Bodo Kurz, Wolfram Timm, Klaus Engelke, Claus-C Glüer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The structure of trabecular bone represents an aspect of bone properties that affects vertebral bone strength independently of bone mineral density [M. Kleerekoper, A. Villanueva, J. Stanciu, D. Rao, and A. Parfitt. The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures. Calcif. Tissue Int., 37:594-597, Dec 1985; E. Seeman and P. Delmas. Bone quality-the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N. Engl. J. Med., 354:2250-2261, May 2006.]. Using the mathematical concept of fuzzy distance transformation (FDT), we evaluated the accuracy of measurements of trabecular distance (Tb.Di(f)) which can be determined for vertebrae in vivo using high resolution computed tomography (HRCT).
METHODS: In a first step extrema voxels with a very high likelihood of representing bone or marrow are identified. A probability level of being a bone voxel is assigned to all other voxel. This probability is based on the FDT of the voxel's gray-level, preprint submitted to Elsevier June 10, 2008; revised July 15, 2008 i.e. the shortest gray-value weighted distance to the marrow background. Next, the resulting bone structure is skeletonized. The space between the ridges of the skeleton is filled with the largest possible spheres. The average over the radii of the spheres defines Tb.Di(f), a measure of trabecular distance. 14 whole vertebrae embedded in polymethyl methylacrylate were scanned by HRCT (voxel size 156 x 156 x 400 mum(3)) inside an anthropomorphic abdomen phantom. Scans obtained on Scanco Xtreme CT (XCT, voxel size 82(3) microm(3)) without the phantom were used as reference.
RESULTS: Tb.Di(f) calculated on XCT data were almost identical to trabecular distance values (1/Tb.N*) determined with the manufacturer's standard software (r(2)=0.98). Tb.Di(f) values obtained with HRCT correlated strongly with Tb.Di(f) values obtained by XCT (r(2)=0.89). Over the range from 400 to 1400 microm trabecular distance could be estimated with a residual error of 78 microm.
CONCLUSIONS: The FDT based variable Tb.Di(f) provides 3D estimates of trabecular distances with residual errors of less than 100 microm using a HRCT protocol which also can be employed in vivo for assessing vertebral microarchitecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18955170     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.08.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  11 in total

Review 1.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Characterization of knee osteoarthritis-related changes in trabecular bone using texture parameters at various levels of spatial resolution-a simulation study.

Authors:  Torsten Lowitz; Oleg Museyko; Valerie Bousson; Willi A Kalender; Jean Denis Laredo; Klaus Engelke
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-12-03

Review 3.  Quality assurance of imaging techniques used in the clinical management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; J Damilakis; G Solomou; A Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine.

Authors:  M T Löffler; N Sollmann; K Mei; A Valentinitsch; P B Noël; J S Kirschke; T Baum
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Statistical Parametric Mapping of HR-pQCT Images: A Tool for Population-Based Local Comparisons of Micro-Scale Bone Features.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Serena Bonaretti; Galateia J Kazakia; Sundeep Khosla; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas F Lang; Andrew J Burghardt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Judith E Adams; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  C-arm CT for histomorphometric evaluation of lumbar spine trabecular microarchitecture: a study on anorexia nervosa patients.

Authors:  C M Phan; O Khalilzadeh; J Dinkel; I S Wang; M A Bredella; M Misra; K K Miller; A Klibanski; R Gupta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  High-resolution computed tomography for clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Global and Spatial Compartmental Interrelationships of Bone Density, Microstructure, Geometry and Biomechanics in the Distal Radius in a Colles' Fracture Study Using HR-pQCT.

Authors:  Kazuteru Shiraishi; Andrew J Burghardt; Makoto Osaki; Sundeep Khosla; Julio Carballido-Gamio
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.055

10.  Comparative effects of teriparatide and risedronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men: 18-month results of the EuroGIOPs trial.

Authors:  Claus-C Glüer; Fernando Marin; Johann D Ringe; Federico Hawkins; Rüdiger Möricke; Nikolaos Papaioannu; Parvis Farahmand; Salvatore Minisola; Guillermo Martínez; Joan M Nolla; Christopher Niedhart; Nuria Guañabens; Ranuccio Nuti; Emilio Martín-Mola; Friederike Thomasius; Georgios Kapetanos; Jaime Peña; Christian Graeff; Helmut Petto; Beatriz Sanz; Andreas Reisinger; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.