Literature DB >> 18955066

Sequence length bounds for resolving a deep phylogenetic divergence.

Mareike Fischer1, Mike Steel.   

Abstract

In evolutionary biology, genetic sequences carry with them a trace of the underlying tree that describes their evolution from a common ancestral sequence. The question of how many sequence sites are required to recover this evolutionary relationship accurately depends on the model of sequence evolution, the substitution rate, divergence times and the method used to infer phylogenetic history. A particularly challenging problem for phylogenetic methods arises when a rapid divergence event occurred in the distant past. We analyse an idealised form of this problem in which the terminal edges of a symmetric four-taxon tree are some factor (lambda) times the length of the interior edge. We determine an order lambda(2) lower bound on the growth rate for the sequence length required to resolve the tree (independent of any particular branch length). We also show that this rate of sequence length growth can be achieved by existing methods (including the simple 'maximum parsimony' method), and compare these order lambda(2) bounds with an order lambda growth rate for a model that describes low-homoplasy evolution. In the final section, we provide a generic bound on the sequence length requirement for a more general class of Markov processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18955066     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  8 in total

1.  Can quartet analyses combining maximum likelihood estimation and Hennigian logic overcome long branch attraction in phylogenomic sequence data?

Authors:  Patrick Kück; Mark Wilkinson; Christian Groß; Peter G Foster; Johann W Wägele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Estimating Bayesian Phylogenetic Information Content.

Authors:  Paul O Lewis; Ming-Hui Chen; Lynn Kuo; Louise A Lewis; Karolina Fučíková; Suman Neupane; Yu-Bo Wang; Daoyuan Shi
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  More on the Best Evolutionary Rate for Phylogenetic Analysis.

Authors:  Seraina Klopfstein; Tim Massingham; Nick Goldman
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  On the distribution of interspecies correlation for Markov models of character evolution on Yule trees.

Authors:  Willem H Mulder; Forrest W Crawford
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Long branch effects distort maximum likelihood phylogenies in simulations despite selection of the correct model.

Authors:  Patrick Kück; Christoph Mayer; Johann-Wolfgang Wägele; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Utility of characters evolving at diverse rates of evolution to resolve quartet trees with unequal branch lengths: analytical predictions of long-branch effects.

Authors:  Zhuo Su; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Reassessment of the Phylogeny and Systematics of Chinese Parnassia (Celastraceae): A Thorough Investigation Using Whole Plastomes and Nuclear Ribosomal DNA.

Authors:  Ming-Ze Xia; Yan Li; Fa-Qi Zhang; Jing-Ya Yu; Gulzar Khan; Xiao-Feng Chi; Hao Xu; Shi-Long Chen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Dating the diversification of the major lineages of Passeriformes (Aves).

Authors:  Per G P Ericson; Seraina Klopfstein; Martin Irestedt; Jacqueline M T Nguyen; Johan A A Nylander
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.