Literature DB >> 18954777

Adverse events, quality of life, and recurrence rates after laparoscopic adhesiolysis and recurrent incisional hernia mesh repair in patients with previous failed repairs.

Selman Uranues1, Behrooz Salehi, Roberto Bergamaschi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of laparoscopic adhesiolysis and mesh repair on adverse event rates, quality-of-life (QoL) scores, and recurrence rates in patients with recurrent incisional hernia after failed repairs after multiple laparotomies. STUDY
DESIGN: Data on consecutive patients were included prospectively. Recurrent incisional hernia was defined as a fascia defect > 5 cm. Adhesions were classified according to time needed for lysis. A standardized repair with IP polytetrafluoroethylene mesh, transabdominal sutures, and tacks was developed by the surgeons during a pretrial routine. QoL was assessed by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) before operation and at 24-month followup. Values are median (range).
RESULTS: There were 85 consecutive patients aged 55 years (range 29 to 93 years); 45% were men; body mass index, 31 (range 23 to 39); American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I: 27%, II: 70%, III: 2%; comorbidity, 75%; previous laparotomies; 5 (range 2 to 18); previous colectomy, 87%; previous failed repairs, 4 (range 2 to 15); previous mesh repair, 98%; and midline hernia site, 98%. Fascia defect was 255 cm(2) (range 48 to 416 cm(2)), mesh size, 600 cm(2) (range 285 to 884 cm(2)), and operating time 145 minutes (80 to 210 minutes). There was one conversion. Length of stay was 2 days (1 to 9 days). A 15.2% adverse event rate included 1% port-site cellulitis, 7% seroma, and 7% persistent pain. Hernia recurrence rate was 3.5% at 41-month (range 24 to 61 months) followup. GIQLI total scores were significantly improved at followup (98 versus 116; p < 0.001). Domain GIQLI scores were improved at followup for symptoms (54 versus 63; p < 0.001), emotional function (12 versus 16; p < 0.001), and physical function (15 versus 21; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis and recurrent hernia mesh repair resulted in a low rate of adverse events, a substantially improved health-related QoL, and a risk of recurrence similar to the rates associated with first-time hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18954777     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with suture fixation with and without tacks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra; Divya Babu; Paras Singhal; Keerthi Rao; Rajesh Sagar; Subodh Kumar; S Rajeshwari; Vimi Rewari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Safe and easy access technique for the first trocar in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Selman Uranues; Orhan Veli Ozkan; Gordana Tomasch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Tom Wiggins; Sheraz R Markar; Adrian Harris
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of the defect size, the mesh overlap and the fixation depth on ventral hernia repairs: a combined experimental and numerical approach.

Authors:  G Guérin; F Turquier
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected].

Authors:  Gianfranco Silecchia; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Luis Sanchez; Graziano Ceccarelli; Armando Antinori; Luca Ansaloni; Stefano Olmi; Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Diego Cuccurullo; Paolo Baccari; Ferdinando Agresta; Nereo Vettoretto; Micaela Piccoli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outcomes after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does the number of previous recurrences matter? A prospective study.

Authors:  Joaquín Picazo-Yeste; Carlos Moreno-Sanz; Cristina Sedano-Vizcaíno; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Francisco Sánchez-De Pedro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Evaluation of port site hernias, chronic pain and recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a monocentric long-term study.

Authors:  Emilie Liot; Romain Bréguet; Valérie Piguet; Frédéric Ris; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Laparoscopic repair of complex ventral hernia facilitated by pre-operative chemical component relaxation using Botulinum Toxin A.

Authors:  K E Elstner; A S W Jacombs; J W Read; O Rodriguez; M Edye; P H Cosman; A N Dardano; A Zea; T Boesel; D J Mikami; C Craft; N Ibrahim
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Patient Satisfaction, chronic pain, and functional status following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Mike K Liang; Marissa Clapp; Linda T Li; Rachel L Berger; Stephanie C Hicks; Samir Awad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the first Italian Consensus Conference.

Authors:  D Cuccurullo; M Piccoli; F Agresta; S Magnone; F Corcione; V Stancanelli; G Melotti
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.