OBJECTIVE: Mouse embryonic stem cells have demonstrated potential to restore infarcted myocardium after acute myocardial infarction. Although the underlying mechanism remains controversial, magnetic resonance imaging has provided reliable in vivo assessment of functional recovery after cellular transplants. Multimodal comparison of the restorative effects of mouse embryonic stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts was performed to validate magnetic resonance imaging data and provide mechanistic insight. METHODS: SCID-beige mice (n = 55) underwent coronary artery ligation followed by injection of 2.5 x 10(5) mouse embryonic stem cells, 2.5 x 10(5) mouse embryonic fibroblasts, or normal saline solution. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial restoration by mouse embryonic stem cells was evaluated by (1) in vivo pressure-volume loops, (2) in vivo bioluminescence imaging, and (3) ex vivo TaqMan (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, Calif) polymerase chain reaction and immunohistologic examination. RESULTS: In vivo magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 week in the mouse embryonic stem cell group. This finding was validated with (1) pressure-volume loop analysis demonstrating significantly improved systolic and diastolic functions, (2) bioluminescence imaging and polymerase chain reaction showing superior posttransplant survival of mouse embryonic stem cells, (3) immunohistologic identification of cardiac phenotype within engrafted mouse embryonic stem cells, and (4) polymerase chain reaction measuring increased expressions of angiogenic and antiapoptotic genes and decreased expressions of antifibrotic genes. CONCLUSION: This study validates in vivo magnetic resonance imaging as an effective means of evaluating the restorative potential of mouse embryonic stem cells.
OBJECTIVE:Mouse embryonic stem cells have demonstrated potential to restore infarcted myocardium after acute myocardial infarction. Although the underlying mechanism remains controversial, magnetic resonance imaging has provided reliable in vivo assessment of functional recovery after cellular transplants. Multimodal comparison of the restorative effects of mouse embryonic stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts was performed to validate magnetic resonance imaging data and provide mechanistic insight. METHODS: SCID-beige mice (n = 55) underwent coronary artery ligation followed by injection of 2.5 x 10(5) mouse embryonic stem cells, 2.5 x 10(5) mouse embryonic fibroblasts, or normal saline solution. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial restoration by mouse embryonic stem cells was evaluated by (1) in vivo pressure-volume loops, (2) in vivo bioluminescence imaging, and (3) ex vivo TaqMan (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, Calif) polymerase chain reaction and immunohistologic examination. RESULTS: In vivo magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 week in the mouse embryonic stem cell group. This finding was validated with (1) pressure-volume loop analysis demonstrating significantly improved systolic and diastolic functions, (2) bioluminescence imaging and polymerase chain reaction showing superior posttransplant survival of mouse embryonic stem cells, (3) immunohistologic identification of cardiac phenotype within engrafted mouse embryonic stem cells, and (4) polymerase chain reaction measuring increased expressions of angiogenic and antiapoptotic genes and decreased expressions of antifibrotic genes. CONCLUSION: This study validates in vivo magnetic resonance imaging as an effective means of evaluating the restorative potential of mouse embryonic stem cells.
Authors: Jaehoon Chung; Kehkooi Kee; Joëlle K Barral; Rajesh Dash; Hisanori Kosuge; Xi Wang; Irving Weissman; Robert C Robbins; Dwight Nishimura; Thomas Quertermous; Renee A Reijo-Pera; Phillip C Yang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Gurpreet Singh Sandhu; Luis Solorio; Ann-Marie Broome; Nicolas Salem; Jeff Kolthammer; Tejas Shah; Chris Flask; Jeffrey L Duerk Journal: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug
Authors: Atsushi Tachibana; Michelle R Santoso; Morteza Mahmoudi; Praveen Shukla; Lei Wang; Mihoko Bennett; Andrew B Goldstone; Mouer Wang; Masahiro Fukushi; Antje D Ebert; Y Joseph Woo; Eric Rulifson; Phillip C Yang Journal: Circ Res Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Paul J Kim; Morteza Mahmoudi; Xiaohu Ge; Yuka Matsuura; Ildiko Toma; Scott Metzler; Nigel G Kooreman; John Ramunas; Colin Holbrook; Michael V McConnell; Helen Blau; Phillip Harnish; Eric Rulifson; Phillip C Yang Journal: Circ Res Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: I-Ning E Wang; Joshua T Robinson; Grace Do; Guosong Hong; Danny R Gould; Hongjie Dai; Phillip C Yang Journal: Small Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 13.281