| Literature DB >> 18954439 |
Abelardo Meneses-García1, Alejandro Mohar Betancourt, Jorge Herrera Abarca, Adriana Becerril Montes, Lourdes Suarez Roa, Luz Ruíz-Godoy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extranodal T/NK cell lymphomas possess distinctive clinico-pathological characteristics: they are angiocentric, exhibit extensive necrosis. Prognosis is poor in the short term. The objective is to explore the expression of different MMPs in the cells and stroma which are around of the blood vessels damaged and their correlation with clinico-pathological parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty cases of this type of lymphomas were studied and collected patient clinical data. The expressions of MMP-1, 2, 3, 9, 11, 13 and TIMP-1, 2 were studied by immunohistochemistry. Ultrastructural studies were performed in two cases. Statistical analysis was done with Fisher's exact test, Chi(2) test.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18954439 PMCID: PMC2582239 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Figure 1Clinical aspect in patient with T/NK cells angiocentric lymphoma, which shows destructive ulcerative lesion in hard palate and extensive zones of necrosis.
Clinicopathological findings from 20 patients with extra nodal nasal-type T/NK lymphoma.
| 1 | 57 | M | Palate | Mixture | + | III-B | Ct+Rt | DWD (10 m) |
| 2 | 30 | F | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | I-B | Ct+Rt | DWD (16 m) |
| 3 | 42 | F | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | IV-B | Ct | DWD (3 m) |
| 4 | 32 | M | Palate | Mixture | + | II-A | Ct+Rt | DWD (8 m) |
| 5 | 93 | F | Nasal cavity | Large cells | + | II-B | Rt | DWD (1 m) |
| 6 | 49 | M | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | II-B | Ct+Rt | AWOD (16 m) |
| 7 | 38 | M | Nasopharynx | Mixture | + | I-A | Ct+Rt | AWOD (10 m) |
| 8 | 23 | F | Palate | Mixture | + | II-B | Ct+Rt | AWOD (12 m) |
| 9 | 23 | M | Nasopharynx | Mixture | + | III-A | Ct+Rt | AWOD (60 m) |
| 10 | 28 | F | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | III-B | Ct+Rt | DWD (4 m) |
| 11 | 67 | F | Nasopharynx | Mixture | + | III-B | Ct+Rt | DWD (36 m) |
| 12 | 43 | M | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | IV-B | Ct | DWD (1 m) |
| 13 | 62 | M | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | II-B | Rt | DWD (1 m) |
| 14 | 66 | M | Nasal cavity | Large cells | + | II-A | Ct+Rt | AWOD (60 m) |
| 15 | 36 | M | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | IV-B | Ct | DWD (1 m) |
| 16 | 54 | M | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | IV-B | Ct+Rt | DWD (3 m) |
| 17 | 57 | F | Nasal cavity | Large cells | + | IV-B | Rt | DWD (1 m) |
| 18 | 63 | M | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | I-A | Ct+Rt | AWD (132 m) |
| 19 | 22 | M | Nasal cavity | Mixture | + | IV-B | None | DWD (1 m) |
| 20 | 43 | M | Palate | Mixture | + | IV-B | Ct | DWD (3 m) |
Ct, chemotherapy; Rt, radiotherapy; DWD, death with disease; AWOD, alive without disease; AWD, alive with disease.
Figure 2Histological aspect showing polymorphous cell population with malignant lymphoid cells. This picture shows prominence of endothelial cells as well as invasion of small and large cleaved neoplastic cells (HE, 400×)
Relationship between expression of the differents MMPs and TIMPs in the cells.
| Factor | EvenT frecuency | Tes Mc Nemar ≠ Degree of ASSOCIATION |
| Epithelium (-) vs (+) | 9/11 | |
| Tumor (-) vs (+) | 0/20 | |
| Stroma (-) vs (+) | 3/17 | |
| Endothelium (-) vs (+) | 18/2 | |
| Epithelium (-) vs (+) | 9/11 | |
| Tumor (-) vs (+) | 7/13 | |
| Stroma (-) vs (+) | 13/7 | |
| Endothelium (-) vs (+) | 18/2 | |
| Epithelium (-) vs (+) | 11/9 | |
| Tumor (-) vs (+) | 10/10 | |
| Stroma (-) vs (+) | 11/9 | |
| Endothelium (-) vs (+) | 19/1 | |
| Epithelium (-) vs (+) | 17/3 | |
| Tumor (-) vs (+) | 14/6 | |
| Stroma (-) vs (+) | 16/4 | |
| Endothelium (-) vs (+) | 20/0 | |
| Epithelium (-) vs (+) | 8/12 | |
| Tumor (-) vs (+) | 1/19 | |
| Stroma (-) vs (+) | 8/12 | |
| Endothelium (-) vs (+) | 16/4 | |
| Epithelium (-) vs (+) | 12/8 | |
| Tumor (-) vs (+) | 14/6 | |
| Stroma (-) vs (+) | 14/6 | |
| Endothelium (-) vs (+) | 20/0 | |
| Epithelium (-) vs (+) | 8/12 | |
| Tumor (-) vs (+) | 19/1 | |
| Stroma (-) vs (+) | 11/9 | |
| Endothelium (-) vs (+) | 16/4 | |
| Epithelium (-) vs (+) | 17/3 | |
| Tumor (-) vs (+) | 18/2 | |
| Stroma (-) vs (+) | 16/4 | |
| Endothelium (-) vs (+) | 20/0 | |
| 13/2 | ||
| 6/1 | ||
The cells of tumor, stroma, endothelium and epithelium are 50% positive MMPs and TIMPs in each case.
| 1 | -1,-2, -11 | -2 | -1,-2,-3,-11,-13 | ||
| 2 | -1,-9,-11 | -11 | -2,-3,-11,-13, | ||
| 3 | -1,-11 | -1,-9,-11,-13 | -1 | -2,-3,-11,-13, | |
| 4 | -1,-11 | -3,-9,-11 | -1,-2,-11 | ||
| 5 | -1,-2,-3,-9,-11 | -1,-2,-3 | -1,-2,-11,-13, | ||
| 6 | -1,-3,-11 | -1,-11 | -1 | -1 | |
| 7 | -1,-2,-3,-11,-13 | -1,-2,-3,-11,-13 | -2,-3,-11 | -1,-2,-3,-11,-13, | |
| 8 | -1,-2,-3,-11,-13 | -1,-13 | -1,-9 | ||
| 9 | -1,-2,-3, -11 | -1,-2,-3,-11,-13 | -1 | -1,-3,-11 | |
| 10 | -1,-2,-3,-9,-11,-13 | -1,-2,-3 | -1,-2 | -1,-2,-3 | |
| 11 | -1,-11 | -1,-3,-11 | -11 | -1,-3,-11 | |
| 12 | -1,-2,-3,-11 | -1,-3 | -2,-11,-13 | ||
| 13 | -1,-2,-3,-9,-11 | -1,-2,-3,-13 | -1 | ||
| 14 | -1,-2 | -1,-3,-9 | |||
| 15 | -1,-2 | -1,-11 | -11 | ||
| 16 | -1 | -1 | |||
| 17 | -1 | -1 | -1,-2,-3,-11,-13 | ||
| 18 | -1,-2 | -1,-9,-11 | -2,-11,-13 | ||
| 19 | -1,-2 | -1,-2,-11,-13 | -2,-9,-11 | ||
| 20 | -1,-2 | -1,-11 | -1 | -3,-9 |
Figure 3Inmunohistochemical study shows cytoplasmic staining to MMP-11 in neoplastic cells around the blood vessel.
Figure 4Microscopic image showing expression to MMP-1 in the extracelullar tissue, near of the blood vessel (avidin-biotin complex method).
Figure 5Ultrastructure of capillary, observing neoplastic cell with granules in the cytoplasm in the upper area (11 000 A).
Figure 6Closer of the previous image, showing fibres of fragmented collagen with intracytoplasm and extracellular granules. (13 000 A).