Literature DB >> 18954191

Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation.

Nicholas O Rule1, Nalini Ambady, Reginald B Adams, C Neil Macrae.   

Abstract

For clear and unambiguous social categories, person perception occurs quite accurately from minimal cues. This article addresses the perception of an ambiguous social category (male sexual orientation) from minimal cues. Across 5 studies, the authors examined individuals' actual and self-assessed accuracy when judging male sexual orientation from faces and facial features. Although participants were able to make accurate judgments from multiple facial features (i.e., hair, the eyes, and the mouth area), their perceived accuracy was calibrated with their actual accuracy only when making judgments based on hairstyle, a controllable feature. These findings provide evidence that suggests different processes for extracting social category information during perception: explicit judgments based on obvious cues (hairstyle) and intuitive judgments based on nonobvious cues (information from the eyes and mouth area). Differences in the accuracy of judgments based on targets' controllability and perceivers' awareness of cues provides insight into the processes underlying intuitive predictions and intuitive judgments. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18954191     DOI: 10.1037/a0013194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  16 in total

1.  Thin-slice perception develops slowly.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Nancy Kanwisher; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-03-13

2.  Judgments of self-identified gay and heterosexual male speakers: Which phonemes are most salient in determining sexual orientation?

Authors:  Erik C Tracy; Sierra A Bainter; Nicholas P Satariano
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-09

3.  Human's cognitive ability to assess facial cues from photographs: a study of sexual selection in the Bolivian Amazon.

Authors:  Eduardo A Undurraga; Dan T A Eisenberg; Oyunbileg Magvanjav; Ruoxue Wang; William R Leonard; Thomas W McDade; Victoria Reyes-García; Colleen Nyberg; Susan Tanner; Tomás Huanca; Ricardo A Godoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  On the perception of religious group membership from faces.

Authors:  Nicholas O Rule; James V Garrett; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Person (mis)perception: functionally biased sex categorization of bodies.

Authors:  Kerri L Johnson; Masumi Iida; Louis G Tassinary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Inferences About Sexual Orientation: The Roles of Stereotypes, Faces, and The Gaydar Myth.

Authors:  William T L Cox; Patricia G Devine; Alyssa A Bischmann; Janet S Hyde
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-07-28

7.  Sexual orientation biases attentional control: a possible gaydar mechanism.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Linda van Hooidonk; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Fieke Harinck; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-05-07

8.  The roles of featural and configural face processing in snap judgments of sexual orientation.

Authors:  Joshua A Tabak; Vivian Zayas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces.

Authors:  Nicholas O Rule; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Linking racism and homonegativity to healthcare system distrust among young men of color who have sex with men: Evidence from the Healthy Young Men's (HYM) study.

Authors:  Loretta Hsueh; Eric K Layland; Michele D Kipke; Bethany C Bray
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.