Literature DB >> 18953814

Current status of small bowel and multivisceral transplantation.

Rodrigo M Vianna1, Richard S Mangus, A Joseph Tector.   

Abstract

Intestinal transplantation has shown exceptional growth over the past 20 years with remarkable progress. As with other solid organ transplants, intestinal transplantation has moved out of the experimental realm to become the stan dard of care for many patients with intestinal failure. Intestinal transplantation may soon be extended routinely to patients who, although not strictly meeting the criteria for intestinal failure, may benefit from intestinal transplantation, such as patients who have nonresectable indolent tumors or diffuse thrombosis of the portomesenteric system. As clinical experience has increased with intestinal transplantation, outcomes have improved. The currently reported 1-year graft and patient survival rate is 80%, which approaches that for other solid abdominal organs. Unfortunately, most of the gains in survival are seen in the first postoperative year, with long-term survival remaining basically unchanged since the early 1990s. With improved outcomes, more centers have entered into the intestinal transplant arena. In the United States alone, 20 centers performed at least one intestinal transplant in 2007. Increase in access to intestinal transplantation and more widespread awareness of this option likely will result in a consistent increase in the number of yearly transplants for the foreseeable future. Immunosuppressive regimens continue to evolve, with induction therapy being the major change in the past 5 years. Although rejection rates in the first year after transplant have been reduced by induction therapy, long-term side effects of heavy immunosuppression continue to weigh negatively on transplant outcomes. The future for immunosuppression lies in two areas: (1) individual monitoring of the immunosuppression level for each individual patient and (2) development of serum and tissue markers for the early identification of rejection. It is likely that a combination of technologies will allow immunosuppression to be tailored to each recipient. Development of these approaches to immunosuppression is necessary to predict graft dysfunction ahead of irreversible graft injury and allows adjustments in immunosuppression before the onset of rejection. Intestinal transplantation continues to be performed only in situations in which all other therapeutic modalities have failed. No randomized trials compare intestinal transplantation to long-term PN to establish guidelines for a timely referral for this treatment option. Late referral remains a crippling problem in the field of intestinal transplantation, with a great number of patients in need of simultaneous liver transplantation at the time of listing for intestinal transplantation. Early referral for isolated intestinal transplant will reduce the need for simultaneous multiorgan transplants and increase the residual organs available for patients in need of (primarily) liver transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18953814     DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2008.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Surg        ISSN: 0065-3411


  19 in total

Review 1.  Chronic intestinal failure in children.

Authors:  Michael B Krawinkel; Dietmar Scholz; Andreas Busch; Martina Kohl; Lukas M Wessel; Klaus-Peter Zimmer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Psychiatric issues in pediatric organ transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret L Stuber
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

3.  Parenteral fish oil improves outcomes in patients with parenteral nutrition-associated liver injury.

Authors:  Mark Puder; Clarissa Valim; Jonathan A Meisel; Hau D Le; Vincent E de Meijer; Elizabeth M Robinson; Jing Zhou; Christopher Duggan; Kathleen M Gura
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Simultaneous Serial Transverse Enteroplasty (STEP) in Size Mismatch Small Bowel Transplantations.

Authors:  Giovanni Frongia; Ali Majlesara; Arash Saffari; Dezfouli Sepher Abbasi; Negin Gharabaghi; Jürgen Günther Okun; Christian Thiel; Patrick Günther; Rodrigo Vianna; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Flow through a mechanical distraction enterogenesis device: a pilot test.

Authors:  Eiichi A Miyasaka; Manabu Okawada; Richard Herman; Brent Utter; Jonathan Luntz; Diann Brei; Daniel H Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 6.  From portal to splanchnic venous thrombosis: What surgeons should bear in mind.

Authors:  Quirino Lai; Gabriele Spoletini; Rafael S Pinheiro; Fabio Melandro; Nicola Guglielmo; Jan Lerut
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-27

7.  Application of distractive forces to the small intestine: defining safe limits.

Authors:  Eiichi A Miyasaka; Manabu Okawada; Brent Utter; Haytham Mustafa-Maria; Jonathan Luntz; Diann Brei; Daniel H Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Multivisceral transplantation: expanding indications and improving outcomes.

Authors:  Richard S Mangus; A Joseph Tector; Chandrashekhar A Kubal; Jonathan A Fridell; Rodrigo M Vianna
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Intestinal transplants: review of normal imaging appearance and complications.

Authors:  Bashir Hakim; Daniel T Myers; Todd R Williams; Shunji Nagai; John Bonnett
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  The Surgical Approach to Short Bowel Syndrome - Autologous Reconstruction versus Transplantation.

Authors:  Aparna Rege
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.