Literature DB >> 18953552

Postoperative application of amphotericin B nasal spray in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, with a review of the antifungal therapy.

I Gerlinger1, A Fittler, F Fónai, A Patzkó, A Mayer, L Botz.   

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects 1-4% of the adult population. The etiology of this multifactorial, chronic disease, which leads to a significant impairment of the quality of life, often accompanied by nasal polyposis, is not fully understood. In the past decade, it was presumed that the disease, which causes characteristic eosinophilic infiltration of the nasal mucosa, is triggered by an enhanced (but not classical allergic IgE-type) immune response against fungal organisms in the nasal mucus. If this supposition is correct, then it appears obvious that the administration of amphotericin B nasal spray in adequate concentration following endoscopic polypectomy should be advantageous for these patients, and might even reduce the number of recurrent cases. To check on this assumption, we conducted a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial involving 33 patients, 30 of whom remained in the study throughout. Patients with nasal polyposis were operated on with an endoscopic technique between 1 November 2005 and 1 October 2006; group A (14 randomly selected patients) were treated with a nasal spray containing 5 mg/ml amphotericin B, while the placebo group B (16 randomly selected patients) received a nasal spray lacking amphotericin B. We evaluated our results with the aid of a modified Lund-Mackay CT score, the SNAQ-11 test (which assesses changes in the symptoms), a quality of life test and endoscopy. The SPSS 14.0 for Windows program was utilized to process the data of examinations performed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The CT scores of the group A patients 1 year after the operation exhibited wide scattering, without signs of recovery. The CT scores of the group B patients indicated a slight improvement, though this did not prove significant relative to group A. Both the SNAQ-11 test and the quality of life test revealed a significant improvement in each group, but the degrees of change in these tests did not differ significantly between the two groups of patients. The endoscopic findings indicated a slight improvement to the advantage of the amphotericin B-treated group 12 months after the operation. These results lead to the conclusion that the administration of amphotericin B nasal spray to patients operated on for nasal polyposis does not give rise to a significant alteration in either CT score, clinical symptoms, or quality of life. The more favorable clinical aspects observed in the amphotericin B-treated group during the endoscopic follow-up did not correspond to an improvement in the symptoms. In connection with the conclusions drawn from this study, the authors discuss the controversial data available on the fungal etiology of CRS. They critically analyze the contradictory observations and conclusions of seven recent clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18953552     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0836-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  41 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and staging of nasal polyposis.

Authors:  L Malm
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Effects of amphotericin B on ion transport proteins in airway epithelial cells.

Authors:  Lan Jornot; Thierry Rochat; Assunta Caruso; Jean-Silvain Lacroix
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.384

3.  Treatment of allergic fungal sinusitis with high-dose itraconazole.

Authors:  B Manrin Rains; Corey W Mineck
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

4.  Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with intranasal amphotericin B: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial.

Authors:  Jens U Ponikau; David A Sherris; Amy Weaver; Hirohito Kita
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  The diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis.

Authors:  J U Ponikau; D A Sherris; E B Kern; H A Homburger; E Frigas; T A Gaffey; G D Roberts
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with high-dose oral terbinafine: a double blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  D W Kennedy; F A Kuhn; D L Hamilos; S J Zinreich; D Butler; G Warsi; P J Pfister; A Tavakkol
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Amphotericin B nasal lavages: not a solution for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Fenna A Ebbens; Glenis K Scadding; Lydia Badia; Peter W Hellings; Mark Jorissen; Joaquim Mullol; Alda Cardesin; Claus Bachert; Thibaut P J van Zele; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Valerie Lund; Wytske J Fokkens
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Correlation between symptoms and radiological findings in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: an evaluation study using the Sinonasal Assessment Questionnaire and Lund-Mackay grading system.

Authors:  S Basu; C Georgalas; B N Kumar; S Desai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Allergic Aspergillus sinusitis: a newly recognized form of sinusitis.

Authors:  A L Katzenstein; S R Sale; P A Greenberger
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  Diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis.

Authors:  J P Bent; F A Kuhn
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Role of medical therapy in the management of nasal polyps.

Authors:  Isam Alobid; Joaquim Mullol
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  The role of fungi in diseases of the nose and sinuses.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.467

Review 3.  Role of fungi in the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an update.

Authors:  Kathleen T Montone
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Looking after local nasal and sinus mucosa in health, disease and after surgery.

Authors:  S K Kacker
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10-12

Review 5.  Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis and the Unified Airway: the Role of Antifungal Therapy in AFRS.

Authors:  Matthew W Ryan; Christopher M Clark
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  [Guideline for "rhinosinusitis"-long version : S2k guideline of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians and the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; A Beule; D Jobst; L Klimek; M Laudien; M Lell; T J Vogl; U Popert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  Update on Intranasal Medications in Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Kornkiat Snidvongs; Sanguansak Thanaviratananich
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 8.  Antifungal therapy in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peta-Lee Sacks; Richard J Harvey; Janet Rimmer; Richard M Gallagher; Raymond Sacks
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.467

9.  Topical Drug Delivery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jonathan Liang; Andrew P Lane
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2012-12-27

10.  The effectiveness topical amphotericin B in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tianqi Wang; Jinfei Su; Yanjun Feng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.