Literature DB >> 18953068

Ethical issues regarding recruitment to research studies within the primary care consultation.

Sue Wilson1, Heather Draper, Jonathan Ives.   

Abstract

Recruitment to primary care-based studies may occur within the consultation or in dedicated research clinics. For practical and logistic reasons, some patients are recruited to research studies by their family doctor during the consultation. However, this may preclude patients from discussing participation with others and some patients may not feel empowered to refuse participation. This may be a particular problem when patients have their own family doctor, whom they generally see, and the patient feels dependent on their practitioner's goodwill for ongoing care. Recruitment within the practice, therefore, raises ethical issues that warrant further exploration. This discussion article argues that there are reasons to suppose there may be problems associated with family doctors recruiting their own patients into research. Nevertheless, assumptions that patients feel undue pressure or obligation to participate in primary care research may not be justified. It is important that potential research participants have time to consider the implications of participation. However, the risks to patients of consenting to participate in research are, in many instances, less than the risks inherent in their routine treatment. We conclude that it is important that those responsible for the implementation of research ethics approvals and governance procedures are careful to avoid imposing inflexible rules that prevent patients from acting according to their own wishes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18953068     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of underlying factors behind parental refusal or consent for lumbar puncture.

Authors:  Hassib Narchi; Ghassan Ghatasheh; Noura Al Hassani; Layla Al Reyami; Qudsiya Khan
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Practice-based Research Network Research Good Practices (PRGPs): Summary of Recommendations.

Authors:  Rowena J Dolor; Kimberly Campbell-Voytal; Jeanette Daly; Zsolt J Nagykaldi; Maeve O'Beirne; Pamela Sterling; Lyle J Fagnan; Barcey Levy; LeAnn Michaels; Hannah A Louks; Paul Smith; Cheryl B Aspy; V Beth Patterson; Miria Kano; Andrew L Sussman; Robert Williams; Anne Victoria Neale
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Attitudes and perceptions of next-of-kin/loved ones toward end-of-life HIV cure-related research: A qualitative focus group study in Southern California.

Authors:  Sogol S Javadi; Kushagra Mathur; Susanna Concha-Garcia; Hursch Patel; Kelly E Perry; Megan Lo; Jeff Taylor; Andy Kaytes; Susan Little; Sara Gianella; Davey Smith; Karine Dubé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cross-sectional household transmission study of Cryptosporidium shows that C. hominis infections are a key risk factor for spread.

Authors:  Caoimhe McKerr; Rachel M Chalmers; Kristin Elwin; Heather Ayres; Roberto Vivancos; Sarah J O'Brien; Robert M Christley
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.